From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@karlsbakk.net>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Tux vs khttpd? (fwd)
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 14:40:06 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0106121439020.29762-100000@mustard.heime.net> (raw)
Hi everyone!
I tried to send this message to the khttpd group, but got no answer. Can
any of you help me?
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2001 17:31:20 +0000
From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@karlsbakk.net>
To: khttpd-users@zgp.org
Subject: Tux vs khttpd?
hi
Does anyone know any details about how Tux performs in comparison with
khttpd?
Is this a separate project, or is it a somehow 'better version' of the
khttpd?
Are these going to be merged?
roy
-----
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
<roy@karlsbakk.net>
next reply other threads:[~2001-06-12 12:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-06-12 12:40 Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk [this message]
2001-06-12 17:25 ` [OT]: Tux vs khttpd? (fwd) J Sloan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.30.0106121439020.29762-100000@mustard.heime.net \
--to=roy@karlsbakk.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).