* 2.4.4 kernel reports wrong amount of physical memory
@ 2001-05-14 19:09 Jeff Golds
2001-05-14 19:29 ` Alan Cox
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Golds @ 2001-05-14 19:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Hi folks,
I installed the 2.4.4 kernel on a dual P3-733 system with 1 GB of ECC RAM and found that /proc/meminfo reports back only 899MB of RAM. The 2.4.2 kernel (with RedHat patches from the 7.1 release) worked fine as did the 2.4.0 kernel (with RedHat patches from the 7.0 release).
Anyone know what is going on with 2.4.4? At POST, the BIOS reports 1024MB.
-Jeff
--
Jeff Golds
jgolds@resilience.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: 2.4.4 kernel reports wrong amount of physical memory 2001-05-14 19:09 2.4.4 kernel reports wrong amount of physical memory Jeff Golds @ 2001-05-14 19:29 ` Alan Cox 2001-05-14 20:01 ` Rik van Riel 2001-05-14 22:50 ` Wayne Whitney 2 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Alan Cox @ 2001-05-14 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jeff Golds; +Cc: linux-kernel > I installed the 2.4.4 kernel on a dual P3-733 system with 1 GB of ECC RAM and found that /proc/meminfo reports back only 899MB of RAM. The 2.4.2 kernel (with RedHat patches from the 7.1 release) worked fine as did the 2.4.0 kernel (with RedHat patches from the 7.0 release).# Built it with 4GB support. 1Gb actually works out at about 900Mb and possibly wants renaming.. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.4.4 kernel reports wrong amount of physical memory 2001-05-14 19:09 2.4.4 kernel reports wrong amount of physical memory Jeff Golds 2001-05-14 19:29 ` Alan Cox @ 2001-05-14 20:01 ` Rik van Riel 2001-05-14 22:50 ` Wayne Whitney 2 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Rik van Riel @ 2001-05-14 20:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jeff Golds; +Cc: linux-kernel On Mon, 14 May 2001, Jeff Golds wrote: > I installed the 2.4.4 kernel on a dual P3-733 system with 1 GB > of ECC RAM and found that /proc/meminfo reports back only 899MB > of RAM. > Anyone know what is going on with 2.4.4? -EUSER (User Error) You need to compile highmem support into the kernel if you want to use more than 890 MB of RAM, set it to maximum 4GB for best performance... regards, Rik -- Linux MM bugzilla: http://linux-mm.org/bugzilla.shtml Virtual memory is like a game you can't win; However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose... http://www.surriel.com/ http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.4.4 kernel reports wrong amount of physical memory 2001-05-14 19:09 2.4.4 kernel reports wrong amount of physical memory Jeff Golds 2001-05-14 19:29 ` Alan Cox 2001-05-14 20:01 ` Rik van Riel @ 2001-05-14 22:50 ` Wayne Whitney 2001-05-14 23:25 ` Rik van Riel 2 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Wayne Whitney @ 2001-05-14 22:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: riel, Jeff Golds; +Cc: linux-kernel In mailing-lists.linux-kernel, you wrote: > You need to compile highmem support into the kernel if you want to > use more than 890 MB of RAM, set it to maximum 4GB for best > performance... On a similar note, what is the maximum physical memory supported by the 4GB option? Cheers, Wayne ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.4.4 kernel reports wrong amount of physical memory 2001-05-14 22:50 ` Wayne Whitney @ 2001-05-14 23:25 ` Rik van Riel 2001-05-14 23:39 ` Jeff Golds 2001-05-15 0:25 ` H. Peter Anvin 0 siblings, 2 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Rik van Riel @ 2001-05-14 23:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Wayne Whitney; +Cc: Jeff Golds, linux-kernel On Mon, 14 May 2001, Wayne Whitney wrote: > In mailing-lists.linux-kernel, you wrote: > > > You need to compile highmem support into the kernel if you want to > > use more than 890 MB of RAM, set it to maximum 4GB for best > > performance... > > On a similar note, what is the maximum physical memory supported > by the 4GB option? Ummm, 4GB maybe? ;) Rik -- Linux MM bugzilla: http://linux-mm.org/bugzilla.shtml Virtual memory is like a game you can't win; However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose... http://www.surriel.com/ http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.4.4 kernel reports wrong amount of physical memory 2001-05-14 23:25 ` Rik van Riel @ 2001-05-14 23:39 ` Jeff Golds 2001-05-14 23:41 ` Jeff Golds 2001-05-15 0:44 ` Rik van Riel 2001-05-15 0:25 ` H. Peter Anvin 1 sibling, 2 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Jeff Golds @ 2001-05-14 23:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rik van Riel; +Cc: Wayne Whitney, linux-kernel Rik van Riel wrote: > > On Mon, 14 May 2001, Wayne Whitney wrote: > > In mailing-lists.linux-kernel, you wrote: > > > > > You need to compile highmem support into the kernel if you want to > > > use more than 890 MB of RAM, set it to maximum 4GB for best > > > performance... > > > > On a similar note, what is the maximum physical memory supported > > by the 4GB option? > > Ummm, 4GB maybe? ;) > > Rik Ahh, it's totally obvious. 1 GB option = 890 MB, 4 GB option = 4GB. Can I assume a linear relation and get 66.2 MB when I select the 64 MB option? ;) -Jeff -- Jeff Golds jgolds@resilience.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.4.4 kernel reports wrong amount of physical memory 2001-05-14 23:39 ` Jeff Golds @ 2001-05-14 23:41 ` Jeff Golds 2001-05-15 0:44 ` Rik van Riel 1 sibling, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Jeff Golds @ 2001-05-14 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rik van Riel, Wayne Whitney, linux-kernel Jeff Golds wrote: > > Rik van Riel wrote: > > > > On Mon, 14 May 2001, Wayne Whitney wrote: > > > In mailing-lists.linux-kernel, you wrote: > > > > > > > You need to compile highmem support into the kernel if you want to > > > > use more than 890 MB of RAM, set it to maximum 4GB for best > > > > performance... > > > > > > On a similar note, what is the maximum physical memory supported > > > by the 4GB option? > > > > Ummm, 4GB maybe? ;) > > > > Rik > > Ahh, it's totally obvious. 1 GB option = 890 MB, 4 GB option = 4GB. Can I assume a linear relation and get 66.2 MB when I select the 64 MB option? > > ;) > > -Jeff > That's GB not MB =P -Jeff -- Jeff Golds jgolds@resilience.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.4.4 kernel reports wrong amount of physical memory 2001-05-14 23:39 ` Jeff Golds 2001-05-14 23:41 ` Jeff Golds @ 2001-05-15 0:44 ` Rik van Riel 2001-05-15 1:00 ` Mohammad A. Haque 2001-05-15 1:07 ` Jeff Golds 1 sibling, 2 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Rik van Riel @ 2001-05-15 0:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jeff Golds; +Cc: Wayne Whitney, linux-kernel On Mon, 14 May 2001, Jeff Golds wrote: > Ahh, it's totally obvious. 1 GB option = 890 MB, 4 GB option = > 4GB. Can I assume a linear relation and get 66.2 MB when I > select the 64 MB option? Where did you get the mythical "1GB" option? Last I looked we had "off", "4GB" and "64GB" ;) cheers, Rik -- Linux MM bugzilla: http://linux-mm.org/bugzilla.shtml Virtual memory is like a game you can't win; However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose... http://www.surriel.com/ http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.4.4 kernel reports wrong amount of physical memory 2001-05-15 0:44 ` Rik van Riel @ 2001-05-15 1:00 ` Mohammad A. Haque 2001-05-15 1:07 ` Jeff Golds 1 sibling, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Mohammad A. Haque @ 2001-05-15 1:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rik van Riel; +Cc: Jeff Golds, Wayne Whitney, linux-kernel Rik van Riel wrote: > Where did you get the mythical "1GB" option? > > Last I looked we had "off", "4GB" and "64GB" ;) We do .. under 2.4.x In 2.2.x we have 1 Gb and 2 GB ... 2.2.19 at least -- ===================================================================== Mohammad A. Haque http://www.haque.net/ mhaque@haque.net "Alcohol and calculus don't mix. Project Lead Don't drink and derive." --Unknown http://wm.themes.org/ batmanppc@themes.org ===================================================================== ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.4.4 kernel reports wrong amount of physical memory 2001-05-15 0:44 ` Rik van Riel 2001-05-15 1:00 ` Mohammad A. Haque @ 2001-05-15 1:07 ` Jeff Golds 2001-05-15 2:32 ` Rik van Riel 1 sibling, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Jeff Golds @ 2001-05-15 1:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rik van Riel; +Cc: Wayne Whitney, linux-kernel Rik van Riel wrote: > > On Mon, 14 May 2001, Jeff Golds wrote: > > > Ahh, it's totally obvious. 1 GB option = 890 MB, 4 GB option = > > 4GB. Can I assume a linear relation and get 66.2 MB when I > > select the 64 MB option? > > Where did you get the mythical "1GB" option? > > Last I looked we had "off", "4GB" and "64GB" ;) > Good try, except: If you are compiling a kernel which will never run on a machine with more than 1 Gigabyte total physical RAM, answer "off" here (default choice and suitable for most users). This will result in a "3GB/1GB" split: 3GB are mapped so that each process sees a 3GB virtual memory space and the remaining part of the 4GB virtual memory space is used by the kernel to permanently map as much physical memory as possible. If the machine has between 1 and 4 Gigabytes physical RAM, then answer "4GB" here. 1 GB is not more than 1 GB so "off" is the correct choice, according to the docs. Oh I get it NOW. "Off" means the docs are just plain "off". -Jeff -- Jeff Golds jgolds@resilience.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.4.4 kernel reports wrong amount of physical memory 2001-05-15 1:07 ` Jeff Golds @ 2001-05-15 2:32 ` Rik van Riel 2001-05-15 4:19 ` [PATCH] " Wayne Whitney 0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Rik van Riel @ 2001-05-15 2:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jeff Golds; +Cc: Wayne Whitney, linux-kernel On Mon, 14 May 2001, Jeff Golds wrote: > Oh I get it NOW. "Off" means the docs are just plain "off". It is ... "off" means we do 1GB-128MB = 896MB of memory. It would be cool if one of you two could update the docs ;) regards, Rik -- Virtual memory is like a game you can't win; However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose... http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ Send all your spam to aardvark@nl.linux.org (spam digging piggy) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] 2.4.4 kernel reports wrong amount of physical memory 2001-05-15 2:32 ` Rik van Riel @ 2001-05-15 4:19 ` Wayne Whitney 0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Wayne Whitney @ 2001-05-15 4:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rik van Riel; +Cc: Jeff Golds, LKML On Mon, 14 May 2001, Rik van Riel wrote: > It would be cool if one of you two could update the docs ;) OK, here is my attempt, as a patch to Configure.help in 2.4.5-pre1. I hope it is clear, accurate, and not too long-winded, and that my mailer does not munge patches. Cheers, Wayne --- linux-2.4.5-pre1-lcd-via-3.23/Documentation/Configure.help.orig Sat Apr 28 00:27:57 2001 +++ linux-2.4.5-pre1-lcd-via-3.23/Documentation/Configure.help Mon May 14 21:10:30 2001 @@ -198,38 +198,39 @@ High Memory support CONFIG_NOHIGHMEM - Linux can use up to 64 Gigabytes of physical memory on x86 systems. - However, the address space of 32-bit x86 processors is only 4 - Gigabytes large. That means that, if you have a large amount of - physical memory, not all of it can be "permanently mapped" by the - kernel. The physical memory that's not permanently mapped is called - "high memory". + Linux can use up to 64GB (64 Gigabytes) of physical memory on x86 + systems. However, the address space of 32-bit x86 processors is only + 4GB large. As Linux allocates 3GB of this address space to user + space, and the kernel reserves 128MB of address space for its needs, + only 896MB of address space is available for mapping physical + memory. This Configure option controls how the kernel uses this + 896MB window to access physical memory. - If you are compiling a kernel which will never run on a machine with - more than 1 Gigabyte total physical RAM, answer "off" here (default - choice and suitable for most users). This will result in a "3GB/1GB" - split: 3GB are mapped so that each process sees a 3GB virtual memory - space and the remaining part of the 4GB virtual memory space is used - by the kernel to permanently map as much physical memory as - possible. + The default choice, "off", causes the kernel to permanently map + physical memory into this 896MB window. The kernel will be able + to use at most 896MB of physical memory, but this is fine for most + users. - If the machine has between 1 and 4 Gigabytes physical RAM, then - answer "4GB" here. + The "4GB" option allows the kernel to access up to 4GB of physical + memory. This is done by dynamically mapping the physical memory + into the 896MB window as necessary; such dynamically mapped memory + is known as "high memory". - If more than 4 Gigabytes is used then answer "64GB" here. This - selection turns Intel PAE (Physical Address Extension) mode on. - PAE implements 3-level paging on IA32 processors. PAE is fully - supported by Linux, PAE mode is implemented on all recent Intel - processors (Pentium Pro and better). NOTE: If you say "64GB" here, - then the kernel will not boot on CPUs that don't support PAE! + The "64GB" option is necessary to support more than 4GB of physical + memory. This selection turns Intel PAE (Physical Address Extension) + mode on. PAE implements 3-level paging on IA32 processors. PAE is + fully supported by Linux and PAE mode is implemented on all recent + Intel processors (Pentium Pro and better). NOTE: If you say "64GB" + here, then the kernel will not boot on CPUs that don't support PAE! - The actual amount of total physical memory will either be - auto detected or can be forced by using a kernel command line option + The actual amount of total physical memory will either be auto + detected or can be forced by using a kernel command line option such as "mem=256M". (Try "man bootparam" or see the documentation of your boot loader (lilo or loadlin) about how to pass options to the kernel at boot time.) - If unsure, say "off". + If unsure, say "off" if you have 896MB or less of physical memory; + say "4GB" otherwise. Normal PC floppy disk support CONFIG_BLK_DEV_FD ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.4.4 kernel reports wrong amount of physical memory 2001-05-14 23:25 ` Rik van Riel 2001-05-14 23:39 ` Jeff Golds @ 2001-05-15 0:25 ` H. Peter Anvin 2001-05-15 1:57 ` Brian Gerst 1 sibling, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: H. Peter Anvin @ 2001-05-15 0:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel Followup to: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0105142025000.18102-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva> By author: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > On Mon, 14 May 2001, Wayne Whitney wrote: > > In mailing-lists.linux-kernel, you wrote: > > > > > You need to compile highmem support into the kernel if you want to > > > use more than 890 MB of RAM, set it to maximum 4GB for best > > > performance... > > > > On a similar note, what is the maximum physical memory supported > > by the 4GB option? > > Ummm, 4GB maybe? ;) > It seems obvious once you know why the limits are there. The 1 GB limit (actually 1024-128 MB = 896 MB) is a software limit; the 4 GB and 64 GB limits are hardware limits and are exact. IMO we should rename the 1 GB option! -hpa -- <hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.4.4 kernel reports wrong amount of physical memory 2001-05-15 0:25 ` H. Peter Anvin @ 2001-05-15 1:57 ` Brian Gerst 2001-05-15 1:46 ` H. Peter Anvin 0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Brian Gerst @ 2001-05-15 1:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: H. Peter Anvin; +Cc: linux-kernel "H. Peter Anvin" wrote: > > Followup to: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0105142025000.18102-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva> > By author: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br> > In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > > > On Mon, 14 May 2001, Wayne Whitney wrote: > > > In mailing-lists.linux-kernel, you wrote: > > > > > > > You need to compile highmem support into the kernel if you want to > > > > use more than 890 MB of RAM, set it to maximum 4GB for best > > > > performance... > > > > > > On a similar note, what is the maximum physical memory supported > > > by the 4GB option? > > > > Ummm, 4GB maybe? ;) > > > > It seems obvious once you know why the limits are there. The 1 GB > limit (actually 1024-128 MB = 896 MB) is a software limit; the 4 GB > and 64 GB limits are hardware limits and are exact. Even with the 4GB and 64GB options, some physical address space has to be reserved for memory mapped I/O. -- Brian Gerst ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.4.4 kernel reports wrong amount of physical memory 2001-05-15 1:57 ` Brian Gerst @ 2001-05-15 1:46 ` H. Peter Anvin 0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: H. Peter Anvin @ 2001-05-15 1:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Brian Gerst; +Cc: H. Peter Anvin, linux-kernel Brian Gerst wrote: > > > > It seems obvious once you know why the limits are there. The 1 GB > > limit (actually 1024-128 MB = 896 MB) is a software limit; the 4 GB > > and 64 GB limits are hardware limits and are exact. > > Even with the 4GB and 64GB options, some physical address space has to > be reserved for memory mapped I/O. > Oh, right. It's not just virtual address space. Geez, I'm being really dense today :) -hpa -- <hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-05-15 4:20 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 15+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2001-05-14 19:09 2.4.4 kernel reports wrong amount of physical memory Jeff Golds 2001-05-14 19:29 ` Alan Cox 2001-05-14 20:01 ` Rik van Riel 2001-05-14 22:50 ` Wayne Whitney 2001-05-14 23:25 ` Rik van Riel 2001-05-14 23:39 ` Jeff Golds 2001-05-14 23:41 ` Jeff Golds 2001-05-15 0:44 ` Rik van Riel 2001-05-15 1:00 ` Mohammad A. Haque 2001-05-15 1:07 ` Jeff Golds 2001-05-15 2:32 ` Rik van Riel 2001-05-15 4:19 ` [PATCH] " Wayne Whitney 2001-05-15 0:25 ` H. Peter Anvin 2001-05-15 1:57 ` Brian Gerst 2001-05-15 1:46 ` H. Peter Anvin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).