* Adaptec RAID SCSI 2100S
@ 2001-05-14 0:41 Juan Pablo Abuyeres
2001-05-14 1:03 ` Alan Cox
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Juan Pablo Abuyeres @ 2001-05-14 0:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
hi,
I'm trying to make this card work under 2.4.4, but I couldn't find a patch
anywhere to get it working under 2.4.x nor on 2.2.x. I tried with the I2O
kernel support, but it didn't work, it only reported errors after a pretty
long waiting :)
The CDROM the card comes with brings a precompiled module (dpt_i2o) which
works fine (only?) with 2.2.14.
Adaptec web site says next to nothing about current linux drivers for this
card. I don't understand why they don't just provide a patch against
current 2.2.x and 2.4.x ...
The best I've found is http://people.redhat.com/tcallawa/dpt/, where
they provide a rpm packaged 2.2.19 kernel already with support for adaptec
2100S, and works :-) ... (where did they get the driver??? mistery...)
So, is it possible to make it work under 2.4.4? :-)
ps: has anyone the patch againt 2.2.x? (it would be nice to have the
patch, although I already have 2.2.19 with support)
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: Adaptec RAID SCSI 2100S
2001-05-14 0:41 Adaptec RAID SCSI 2100S Juan Pablo Abuyeres
@ 2001-05-14 1:03 ` Alan Cox
2001-05-14 17:02 ` Juan Pablo Abuyeres
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Alan Cox @ 2001-05-14 1:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Juan Pablo Abuyeres; +Cc: linux-kernel
> I'm trying to make this card work under 2.4.4, but I couldn't find a patch
> anywhere to get it working under 2.4.x nor on 2.2.x. I tried with the I2O
> kernel support, but it didn't work, it only reported errors after a pretty
> long waiting :)
You need to 2.4.4ac8 or higher for dpt i2o_scsi and 2.4.4ac5 or so or higher
for dpt i2o_block
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: Adaptec RAID SCSI 2100S
2001-05-14 1:03 ` Alan Cox
@ 2001-05-14 17:02 ` Juan Pablo Abuyeres
2001-05-14 17:03 ` Alan Cox
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Juan Pablo Abuyeres @ 2001-05-14 17:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Cox; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Mon, 14 May 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> > I'm trying to make this card work under 2.4.4, but I couldn't find a patch
> > anywhere to get it working under 2.4.x nor on 2.2.x. I tried with the I2O
> > kernel support, but it didn't work, it only reported errors after a pretty
> > long waiting :)
>
> You need to 2.4.4ac8 or higher for dpt i2o_scsi and 2.4.4ac5 or so or higher
> for dpt i2o_block
well, I applied 2.4.4ac8 (I couldn't find ac9) and I still have only
errors when recognizing the hardware. The long waiting is gone. I will try
to send the messages somehow. They were not saved on log files because it
couldn't mount the devices (and I don't have a spare disk to do the trick
:/)
Ideas?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: Adaptec RAID SCSI 2100S
2001-05-14 17:02 ` Juan Pablo Abuyeres
@ 2001-05-14 17:03 ` Alan Cox
2001-05-14 21:31 ` Juan Pablo Abuyeres
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Alan Cox @ 2001-05-14 17:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Juan Pablo Abuyeres; +Cc: Alan Cox, linux-kernel
> well, I applied 2.4.4ac8 (I couldn't find ac9) and I still have only
> errors when recognizing the hardware. The long waiting is gone. I will try
> to send the messages somehow. They were not saved on log files because it
> couldn't mount the devices (and I don't have a spare disk to do the trick
> :/)
>
> Ideas?
"Mine works" 8)
Send me the messages. I'd really like to see whats up
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: Adaptec RAID SCSI 2100S
2001-05-14 17:03 ` Alan Cox
@ 2001-05-14 21:31 ` Juan Pablo Abuyeres
2001-05-14 21:33 ` Alan Cox
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Juan Pablo Abuyeres @ 2001-05-14 21:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Cox; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Mon, 14 May 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> > well, I applied 2.4.4ac8 (I couldn't find ac9) and I still have only
> > errors when recognizing the hardware. The long waiting is gone. I will try
> > to send the messages somehow. They were not saved on log files because it
> > couldn't mount the devices (and I don't have a spare disk to do the trick
> > :/)
> >
> > Ideas?
>
> "Mine works" 8)
>
> Send me the messages. I'd really like to see whats up
you asked for it :-)
This is a RedHat 7.1 with kernel-2.4.4-ac9
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: SCSI subsystem driver Revision: 1.00
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: request_module[scsi_hostadapter]: Root fs not
mounted
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: i2o_scsi.c: Version 0.0.1
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: chain_pool: 2048 bytes @ c14b7800
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: (512 byte buffers X 4 can_queue X 1 i2o
controllers)
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: PARAMS_GET - Error:
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: ErrorInfoSize = 0x01, BlockStatus = 0x08,
BlockSize = 0x0002
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: PARAMS_GET - Error:
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: ErrorInfoSize = 0x01, BlockStatus = 0x08,
BlockSize = 0x0002
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: scsi0 : i2o/iop0
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: Vendor: QUANTUM Model: ATLAS10K2-TY184L
Rev: DDD6
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: Type: Direct-Access
ANSI SCSI revision: 03
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: Vendor: QUANTUM Model: ATLAS10K2-TY184L
Rev: DDD6
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: Type: Direct-Access
ANSI SCSI revision: 03
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: Attached scsi disk sda at scsi0, channel 0,
id 1, lun 0
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: Attached scsi disk sdb at scsi0, channel 0,
id 2, lun 0
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: scsi0 channel 0 : resetting for second half
of retries.
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: SCSI bus is being reset for host 0 channel 0.
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: i2o_scsi: Attempting to reset the bus.
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: i2o_scsi: bus reset reply.
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: scsi0 channel 0 : resetting for second half
of retries.
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: SCSI bus is being reset for host 0 channel 0.
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: i2o_scsi: Attempting to reset the bus.
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: i2o_scsi: bus reset reply.
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: scsi0 channel 0 : resetting for second half
of retries.
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: SCSI bus is being reset for host 0 channel 0.
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: i2o_scsi: Attempting to reset the bus.
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: i2o_scsi: bus reset reply.
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: sda : READ CAPACITY failed.
May 14 16:29:12 lala keytable:
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: sda : status = 0, message = 00, host = 7,
driver = 27
May 14 16:29:12 lala keytable: Loading system font:
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: sda : sense not available.
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: sda : block size assumed to be 512 bytes,
disk size 1GB.
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: sda: sda1 sda2 < sda5 sda6 >
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: scsi0 channel 0 : resetting for second half
of retries.
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: SCSI bus is being reset for host 0 channel 0.
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: i2o_scsi: Attempting to reset the bus.
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: i2o_scsi: bus reset reply.
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: scsi0 channel 0 : resetting for second half
of retries.
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: SCSI bus is being reset for host 0 channel 0.
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: i2o_scsi: Attempting to reset the bus.
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: i2o_scsi: bus reset reply.
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: scsi0 channel 0 : resetting for second half
of retries.
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: SCSI bus is being reset for host 0 channel 0.
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: i2o_scsi: Attempting to reset the bus.
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: i2o_scsi: bus reset reply.
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: sdb : READ CAPACITY failed.
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: sdb : status = 0, message = 00, host = 7,
driver = 27
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: sdb : sense not available.
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: sdb : block size assumed to be 512 bytes,
disk size 1GB.
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: sdb: sdb1 sdb2 < sdb5 sdb6 >
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: NET4: Linux TCP/IP 1.0 for NET4.0
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: IP Protocols: ICMP, UDP, TCP, IGMP
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: IP: routing cache hash table of 2048 buckets,
16Kbytes
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: TCP: Hash tables configured (established
16384 bind 16384)
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: NET4: Unix domain sockets 1.0/SMP for Linux
NET4.0.
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem) readonly.
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: Freeing unused kernel memory: 208k freed
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: Adding Swap: 265032k swap-space (priority -1)
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: Claim Claimed Mount Lock Ready.
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: Flushing...Unlocking...Unlocked.
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: Unclaim
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: Claim Claimed Mount Lock Ready.
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: Flushing...Unlocking...Unlocked.
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: Unclaim
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: Claim Claimed Mount Lock Ready.
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: Flushing...Unlocking...Unlocked.
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: Unclaim
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: Claim Claimed Mount Lock Ready.
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: Flushing...Unlocking...Unlocked.
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: Unclaim
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: Claim Claimed Mount Lock Ready.
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: Flushing...Unlocking...Unlocked.
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: Unclaim
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: Claim Claimed Mount Lock Ready.
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: Flushing...Unlocking...Unlocked.
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: Unclaim
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: Claim Claimed Mount Lock Ready.
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: Flushing...Unlocking...Unlocked.
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: Unclaim
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: Claim Claimed Mount Lock Ready.
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: Flushing...Unlocking...Unlocked.
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: Unclaim
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: Claim Claimed Mount Lock Ready.
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: Flushing...Unlocking...Unlocked.
May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: Unclaim
Then When I tried to fdisk /dev/sda (/dev/sda is a RAID1 of two
Quantum disks) syslog shows this:
May 14 16:32:58 lala kernel: Queue depth now 2.
May 14 16:32:58 lala kernel: Queue depth now 3.
May 14 16:32:58 lala kernel: Queue depth now 4.
May 14 16:33:28 lala kernel: scsi : aborting command due to timeout : pid
0, scsi0, channel 0, id 1, lun 0 Read (10) 00 00 00 00 06 00 00 02 00
May 14 16:33:28 lala kernel: i2o_scsi: Aborting command block.
May 14 16:33:28 lala kernel: SCSI host 0 abort (pid 0) timed out -
resetting
May 14 16:33:28 lala kernel: SCSI bus is being reset for host 0 channel 0.
May 14 16:33:28 lala kernel: i2o_scsi: Attempting to reset the bus.
May 14 16:33:28 lala kernel: i2o_scsi: bus reset reply.
May 14 16:33:29 lala kernel: SCSI host 0 channel 0 reset (pid 0) timed out
- trying harder
May 14 16:33:29 lala kernel: SCSI bus is being reset for host 0 channel 0.
May 14 16:33:29 lala kernel: i2o_scsi: Attempting to reset the bus.
May 14 16:33:29 lala kernel: i2o_scsi: bus reset reply.
May 14 16:33:29 lala kernel: SCSI host 0 reset (pid 0) timed out again -
May 14 16:33:29 lala kernel: probably an unrecoverable SCSI bus or device
hang.
After that, I got into fdisk... and that was a little ugly:
[root@lala log]# fdisk /dev/sda
Command (m for help): p
Disk /dev/sda: 64 heads, 32 sectors, 1023 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 2048 * 512 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 * 1 16 16033+ 83 Linux
Partition 1 has different physical/logical beginnings (non-Linux?):
phys=(0, 1, 1) logical=(0, 1, 32)
Partition 1 has different physical/logical endings:
phys=(1, 254, 63) logical=(15, 44, 2)
Partition 1 does not end on cylinder boundary:
phys=(1, 254, 63) should be (1, 63, 32)
/dev/sda2 16 17509 17912475 5 Extended
Partition 2 has different physical/logical beginnings (non-Linux?):
phys=(2, 0, 1) logical=(15, 44, 3)
Partition 2 has different physical/logical endings:
phys=(1023, 254, 63) logical=(17508, 21, 24)
Partition 2 does not end on cylinder boundary:
phys=(1023, 254, 63) should be (1023, 63, 32)
/dev/sda5 16 518 514048+ 82 Linux swap
/dev/sda6 518 17509 17398363+ 83 Linux
Command (m for help):
[root@lala log]# uname -a
Linux lala 2.4.4-ac9 #3 Mon May 14 16:24:06 CLT 2001 i686 unknown
[root@lala log]# lspci
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 82815 815 Chipset Host Bridge and
Memory Controller Hub (rev 02)
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 82815 CGC [Chipset
Graphics Controller] (rev 02)
00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82820 820 (Camino 2) Chipset PCI
(rev 02)
00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation 82820 820 (Camino 2) Chipset ISA
Bridge (ICH2) (rev 02)
00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82820 820 (Camino 2) Chipset IDE
U100 (rev 02)
00:1f.2 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82820 820 (Camino 2) Chipset USB
(Hub A) (rev 02)
00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corporation 82820 820 (Camino 2) Chipset SMBus (rev
02)
00:1f.4 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82820 820 (Camino 2) Chipset USB
(Hub B) (rev 02)
01:08.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82820 820 (Camino 2)
Chipset Ethernet (rev 01)
01:09.0 PCI bridge: Distributed Processing Technology PCI Bridge (rev 02)
01:09.1 I2O: Distributed Processing Technology SmartRAID V Controller (rev
02)
01:0a.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82557 [Ethernet Pro 100]
(rev 08)
01:0b.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82557 [Ethernet Pro 100]
(rev 08)
01:0c.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82557 [Ethernet Pro 100]
(rev 08)
01:0d.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82557 [Ethernet Pro 100]
(rev 08)
Now, I removed the IDE Hard disk I used to get the previous logs and
booted up with the SCSI array itself, with kernel 2.2.19 patched with some
patch from adaptec to get dpt_i2o support:
[root@lala /root]# uname -a
Linux lala 2.2.19-6.2.1.DPT #1 Tue May 8 19:11:16 EDT 2001 i686 unknown
May 14 17:13:11 lala kernel: Adaptec: Reading the hardware resource table.
This could take up to 5 minutes
May 14 17:13:11 lala kernel: Adaptec: Hardware resource table read.
May 14 17:13:11 lala kernel: scsi0 : Vendor: DPT Model: 2100S
Rev: 320P
May 14 17:13:11 lala kernel: scsi : 1 host.
May 14 17:13:11 lala kernel: Vendor: ADAPTEC Model: RAID-1
Rev: 320P
May 14 17:13:11 lala kernel: Type: Direct-Access
ANSI SCSI revision: 02
May 14 17:13:11 lala kernel: Detected scsi disk sda at scsi0, channel 0,
id 1, lun 0
May 14 17:13:11 lala kernel: scsi : detected 1 SCSI disk total.
May 14 17:13:11 lala kernel: SCSI device sda: hdwr sector= 512 bytes.
Sectors= 35860480 [17510 MB] [17.5 GB]
May 14 17:13:11 lala kernel: Partition check:
May 14 17:13:11 lala kernel: sda: sda1 sda2 < sda5 sda6 >
..
.
May 14 17:13:13 lala dpt: Starting Adaptec daemons
And issuing a fdisk:
[root@lala log]# fdisk /dev/sda
The number of cylinders for this disk is set to 2232.
There is nothing wrong with that, but this is larger than 1024,
and could in certain setups cause problems with:
1) software that runs at boot time (e.g., LILO)
2) booting and partitioning software from other OSs
(e.g., DOS FDISK, OS/2 FDISK)
Command (m for help): p
Disk /dev/sda: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 2232 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 * 1 2 16033+ 83 Linux
/dev/sda2 3 2232 17912475 5 Extended
/dev/sda5 3 66 514048+ 82 Linux swap
/dev/sda6 67 2232 17398363+ 83 Linux
Command (m for help):
So, I don't know if I'm doing something wrong or what, but I haven't been
able to get it working on 2.4.4 yet... please help.
Thanks.
Juan Pablo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: Adaptec RAID SCSI 2100S
2001-05-14 21:31 ` Juan Pablo Abuyeres
@ 2001-05-14 21:33 ` Alan Cox
2001-05-14 21:51 ` Juan Pablo Abuyeres
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Alan Cox @ 2001-05-14 21:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Juan Pablo Abuyeres; +Cc: Alan Cox, linux-kernel
> May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: PARAMS_GET - Error:
> May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: ErrorInfoSize = 0x01, BlockStatus = 0x08,
> BlockSize = 0x0002
> May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: PARAMS_GET - Error:
> May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: ErrorInfoSize = 0x01, BlockStatus = 0x08,
> BlockSize = 0x0002
This is OK. I am asking the card for tables and it is telling me it doesnt
have them
> May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: scsi0 : i2o/iop0
Ok it found a scsi mode IOP
> May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: sda : sense not available.
That might be my bug
> May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: i2o_scsi: bus reset reply.
> May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: sdb : READ CAPACITY failed.
And it struggles for some reason to get going.
> May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: Claim Claimed Mount Lock Ready.
> May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: Flushing...Unlocking...Unlocked.
> May 14 16:29:12 lala kernel: Unclaim
Debugging..
> Then When I tried to fdisk /dev/sda (/dev/sda is a RAID1 of two
> Quantum disks) syslog shows this:
is /dev/sda the raid or the disks raw ?
> And issuing a fdisk:
Ok the geometry is different
> So, I don't know if I'm doing something wrong or what, but I haven't been
> able to get it working on 2.4.4 yet... please help.
Ok I need to put mroe disks and newer firmware on my card when I have some
time
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: Adaptec RAID SCSI 2100S
2001-05-14 21:33 ` Alan Cox
@ 2001-05-14 21:51 ` Juan Pablo Abuyeres
2001-05-14 22:46 ` Josh Logan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Juan Pablo Abuyeres @ 2001-05-14 21:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Cox; +Cc: linux-kernel
> > Then When I tried to fdisk /dev/sda (/dev/sda is a RAID1 of two
> > Quantum disks) syslog shows this:
>
> is /dev/sda the raid or the disks raw ?
/dev/sda is the RAID1
> > So, I don't know if I'm doing something wrong or what, but I haven't been
> > able to get it working on 2.4.4 yet... please help.
>
> Ok I need to put mroe disks and newer firmware on my card when I have some
> time
my /dev/dsa is a RAID1 made of two quantum atlas 10K II 18.xGb.
Unfortunately I have to get this RAID running this week (maybe on
wednesday) and after that I won't be able to do tests... so.. maybe
I would have to use 2.2.19 instead of 2.4.4 :-(...
Juan Pablo Abuyeres
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: Adaptec RAID SCSI 2100S
2001-05-14 21:51 ` Juan Pablo Abuyeres
@ 2001-05-14 22:46 ` Josh Logan
2001-05-14 23:17 ` Juan Pablo Abuyeres
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Josh Logan @ 2001-05-14 22:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Juan Pablo Abuyeres; +Cc: Alan Cox, linux-kernel
What makes you think /dev/sda is the raid? For me cat /proc/scsi/scsi
lists all 4 drives which, to me, implies that it is raw.
fdisk could not partition the raid by default. I needed to use sfdisk the
first time. After that fdisk worked fine.
If I have both modules loaded I can mount /dev/i2o/hd/dics0/part1 but not
/dev/sda1 (no filesystem).
I was hoping i2o_scsi would make it appear as a "normal" scsi device, but
I don't think that is happening with the current driver.
If you are having a different scsi setup I would be interested in trying
to set my system up the same way. Thanks!
Later, JOSH
On Mon, 14 May 2001, Juan Pablo Abuyeres wrote:
> > > Then When I tried to fdisk /dev/sda (/dev/sda is a RAID1 of two
> > > Quantum disks) syslog shows this:
> >
> > is /dev/sda the raid or the disks raw ?
>
> /dev/sda is the RAID1
>
> > > So, I don't know if I'm doing something wrong or what, but I haven't been
> > > able to get it working on 2.4.4 yet... please help.
> >
> > Ok I need to put mroe disks and newer firmware on my card when I have some
> > time
>
> my /dev/dsa is a RAID1 made of two quantum atlas 10K II 18.xGb.
> Unfortunately I have to get this RAID running this week (maybe on
> wednesday) and after that I won't be able to do tests... so.. maybe
> I would have to use 2.2.19 instead of 2.4.4 :-(...
>
> Juan Pablo Abuyeres
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: Adaptec RAID SCSI 2100S
2001-05-14 22:46 ` Josh Logan
@ 2001-05-14 23:17 ` Juan Pablo Abuyeres
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Juan Pablo Abuyeres @ 2001-05-14 23:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Josh Logan; +Cc: Alan Cox, linux-kernel
Before merging both hard disks I saw each of them as a separate SCSI
device, at boot time and when the system booted up. After building the
RAID1, when the system boots I only see one RAID device recognized, and so
do I when linux recognizes it.
[root@lala log]# cat /proc/scsi/dpt_i2o/0
Vendor: DPT Model: 2100S Rev: 320P, scsi 0:
DPT I2O Driver Version: 1.14/1.14:
cmd_per_lun = 210, max_id = 15, max_lun = 7, max_channel = 0
sg_tablesize = 39, irq = 11, OutstandingMsgs = 0
maxfromiopmsgs = 64, maxtoiopmsgs = 210
Devices:
Channel = 0, Target = 1, Lun = 0
[root@lala log]#
[root@lala log]# cat /proc/scsi/scsi
Attached devices:
Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 01 Lun: 00
Vendor: ADAPTEC Model: RAID-1 Rev: 320P
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02
[root@lala log]#
If I want to see each device separately I have to go to the controller's
software by pressing ctrl-a at boot time.
Juan Pablo Abuyeres
On Mon, 14 May 2001, Josh Logan wrote:
>
> What makes you think /dev/sda is the raid? For me cat /proc/scsi/scsi
> lists all 4 drives which, to me, implies that it is raw.
>
> fdisk could not partition the raid by default. I needed to use sfdisk the
> first time. After that fdisk worked fine.
>
> If I have both modules loaded I can mount /dev/i2o/hd/dics0/part1 but not
> /dev/sda1 (no filesystem).
>
> I was hoping i2o_scsi would make it appear as a "normal" scsi device, but
> I don't think that is happening with the current driver.
>
> If you are having a different scsi setup I would be interested in trying
> to set my system up the same way. Thanks!
>
> Later, JOSH
>
>
> On Mon, 14 May 2001, Juan Pablo Abuyeres wrote:
>
> > > > Then When I tried to fdisk /dev/sda (/dev/sda is a RAID1 of two
> > > > Quantum disks) syslog shows this:
> > >
> > > is /dev/sda the raid or the disks raw ?
> >
> > /dev/sda is the RAID1
> >
> > > > So, I don't know if I'm doing something wrong or what, but I haven't been
> > > > able to get it working on 2.4.4 yet... please help.
> > >
> > > Ok I need to put mroe disks and newer firmware on my card when I have some
> > > time
> >
> > my /dev/dsa is a RAID1 made of two quantum atlas 10K II 18.xGb.
> > Unfortunately I have to get this RAID running this week (maybe on
> > wednesday) and after that I won't be able to do tests... so.. maybe
> > I would have to use 2.2.19 instead of 2.4.4 :-(...
> >
> > Juan Pablo Abuyeres
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> >
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Adaptec RAID SCSI 2100S
@ 2001-05-14 18:43 Giulio Orsero
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Giulio Orsero @ 2001-05-14 18:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jpabuyer; +Cc: linux-kernel
linux.adaptec.com is where they put linux stuff.
Ask Deanna_Bonds@adaptec.com for the latest 2.4.x kernel patch/driver for dpt
i2o controllers.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-05-14 23:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-05-14 0:41 Adaptec RAID SCSI 2100S Juan Pablo Abuyeres
2001-05-14 1:03 ` Alan Cox
2001-05-14 17:02 ` Juan Pablo Abuyeres
2001-05-14 17:03 ` Alan Cox
2001-05-14 21:31 ` Juan Pablo Abuyeres
2001-05-14 21:33 ` Alan Cox
2001-05-14 21:51 ` Juan Pablo Abuyeres
2001-05-14 22:46 ` Josh Logan
2001-05-14 23:17 ` Juan Pablo Abuyeres
2001-05-14 18:43 Giulio Orsero
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).