From: Alan Stern <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: Greg KH <email@example.com> Cc: David Brownell <firstname.lastname@example.org>, <email@example.com>, <firstname.lastname@example.org> Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] [RFC] consolidate /sbin/hotplug call for pci and usb Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 15:34:07 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview] Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33L2.email@example.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20020926184345.GC6250@kroah.com> On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 09:14:48AM -0700, David Brownell wrote: > > I think it _could_ be fine to do such rmmods, if all the module > > remove races were removed ... and (for this issue) if the primitve > > were actually "remove if the driver is not (a) in active use, or > > (b) bound to any device". Today we have races and (a) ... but it's > > the lack of (b) that prevents hotplug from even trying to rmmod, > > on the optimistic assumption there are no races. > > But how do we accomplish (b) for devices that we can't remove from the > system? Like 99.9% of the pci systems? > > I agree it would be "nice", but probably never realistic :) This raises a generally interesting question: When should a driver module be loaded? Should it be there all the time? -- usually not. Or only when the device is in active use? Also at detection (hotplug) and removal time? As long as the device is installed? What if the device is built into the system and can never be removed? What if the device is not subject to hotplugging itself but is required in order to operate another device that can be hotplugged (e.g., a USB host controller driver)? I think it's clear that the answer must depend on the particular driver, and that no single scheme involving usage counts (or the equivalent) can suffice for every situation. Is there a way to let the kernel provide a variety of mechanisms and let the device driver (or even the user) select which one gets used? Alan Stern
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-26 19:28 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2002-09-25 21:29 Greg KH 2002-09-25 22:04 ` Kai Germaschewski 2002-09-25 22:48 ` Greg KH 2002-09-26 0:11 ` [linux-usb-devel] " David Brownell 2002-09-26 0:25 ` Greg KH 2002-09-26 2:44 ` David Brownell 2002-09-26 4:27 ` Greg KH 2002-09-26 16:14 ` David Brownell 2002-09-26 18:43 ` Greg KH 2002-09-26 19:32 ` David Brownell 2002-09-26 19:34 ` Alan Stern [this message] 2002-09-26 23:35 ` [linux-usb-devel] [RFC] consolidate /sbin/hotplug call for pciand usb Oliver Neukum 2002-09-26 17:48 ` [RFC] consolidate /sbin/hotplug call for pci and usb - take 2 Greg KH [not found] <20020925212955.GA32487@kroah.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel> [not found] ` <3D9250CD.firstname.lastname@example.org> 2002-09-26 0:33 ` [linux-usb-devel] [RFC] consolidate /sbin/hotplug call for pci and usb Andi Kleen 2002-09-26 0:46 ` Matthew Dharm 2002-09-26 1:01 ` Andi Kleen 2002-09-26 2:30 ` David Brownell
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.33L2.email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --subject='Re: [linux-usb-devel] [RFC] consolidate /sbin/hotplug call for pci and usb' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).