* Fair scheduling in 2.4 ?
@ 2004-01-02 15:41 Robert Mena
2004-01-02 17:50 ` Rik van Riel
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Robert Mena @ 2004-01-02 15:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Hi,
Back in the days of kernel 2.2 there was a patch (from
Rik van Riel if I recall) to the kernel so no single
user could use all available cpu.
I was wondering if this feature (or something like it)
has been ported or integrated in 2.4.x series ?
regards,
rt
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Find out what made the Top Yahoo! Searches of 2003
http://search.yahoo.com/top2003
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Fair scheduling in 2.4 ?
2004-01-02 15:41 Fair scheduling in 2.4 ? Robert Mena
@ 2004-01-02 17:50 ` Rik van Riel
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Rik van Riel @ 2004-01-02 17:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert Mena; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Fri, 2 Jan 2004, Robert Mena wrote:
> Back in the days of kernel 2.2 there was a patch (from
> Rik van Riel if I recall) to the kernel so no single
> user could use all available cpu.
>
> I was wondering if this feature (or something like it)
> has been ported or integrated in 2.4.x series ?
There's a few versions for 2.4 on my patches page ;)
http://surriel.com/patches/
--
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-01-02 17:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-01-02 15:41 Fair scheduling in 2.4 ? Robert Mena
2004-01-02 17:50 ` Rik van Riel
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).