* [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.0.0b quickfix @ 2005-12-21 22:34 Junio C Hamano 2005-12-21 23:12 ` H. Peter Anvin 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Junio C Hamano @ 2005-12-21 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: git, linux-kernel I've pushed out a v1.0.0b maint release to fix a bug in HTTP fetch that was discovered today X-<. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.0.0b quickfix 2005-12-21 22:34 [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.0.0b quickfix Junio C Hamano @ 2005-12-21 23:12 ` H. Peter Anvin 2005-12-22 9:39 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: H. Peter Anvin @ 2005-12-21 23:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Junio C Hamano; +Cc: git, linux-kernel Junio C Hamano wrote: > I've pushed out a v1.0.0b maint release to fix a bug in HTTP > fetch that was discovered today X-<. > Wouldn't it make more sense for the maintenance release to be 1.0.1? -hpa ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.0.0b quickfix 2005-12-21 23:12 ` H. Peter Anvin @ 2005-12-22 9:39 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2005-12-22 17:46 ` Linus Torvalds 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt @ 2005-12-22 9:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: H. Peter Anvin; +Cc: Junio C Hamano, git, linux-kernel On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 15:12 -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Junio C Hamano wrote: > > I've pushed out a v1.0.0b maint release to fix a bug in HTTP > > fetch that was discovered today X-<. > > > > Wouldn't it make more sense for the maintenance release to be 1.0.1? Seconded. letters in versions are bad. With my MacOS background, for me, "b" means "beta" :) Ben. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.0.0b quickfix 2005-12-22 9:39 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt @ 2005-12-22 17:46 ` Linus Torvalds 2005-12-23 16:12 ` Ingo Oeser 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Linus Torvalds @ 2005-12-22 17:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt; +Cc: H. Peter Anvin, Junio C Hamano, git, linux-kernel On Thu, 22 Dec 2005, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > > Wouldn't it make more sense for the maintenance release to be 1.0.1? > > Seconded. letters in versions are bad. With my MacOS background, for me, > "b" means "beta" :) FWIW, thirded. The kernel used to use letters too, and it's cute, but just using multiple levels of release numbers is much more common. Linus ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.0.0b quickfix 2005-12-22 17:46 ` Linus Torvalds @ 2005-12-23 16:12 ` Ingo Oeser 2005-12-24 9:44 ` Junio C Hamano 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Ingo Oeser @ 2005-12-23 16:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel Cc: Linus Torvalds, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, H. Peter Anvin, Junio C Hamano, git On Thursday 22 December 2005 18:46, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, 22 Dec 2005, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > Wouldn't it make more sense for the maintenance release to be 1.0.1? > > Seconded. letters in versions are bad. With my MacOS background, for me, > > "b" means "beta" :) > FWIW, thirded. The kernel used to use letters too, and it's cute, but just > using multiple levels of release numbers is much more common. Also sucks because letters after numbers a read as "units". Just compare 5h, 3kg, 20cm, 9in, 1.3h Also putting letters after version numbers usally gives me a feeling that the author is not sure about what he does. But this is just me, I guess I hope util-linux is going to learn all that one day :-) Regards Ingo Oeser ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.0.0b quickfix 2005-12-23 16:12 ` Ingo Oeser @ 2005-12-24 9:44 ` Junio C Hamano 2005-12-24 10:16 ` Andreas Ericsson 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Junio C Hamano @ 2005-12-24 9:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ingo Oeser Cc: linux-kernel, Linus Torvalds, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, H. Peter Anvin, git Ingo Oeser <ioe-lkml@rameria.de> writes: > Also sucks because letters after numbers a read as "units". > > Just compare 5h, 3kg, 20cm, 9in, 1.3h If your first reaction after seeing 0.99.7a 0.99.7b 0.99.7c was that they were numbers in unrelated units a b c and cannot be compared with each other, you need to get your head examined ;-). I concede that it is a cute point you tried to make [*1*], but I do not think your presentation was convincing enough. [Footnote] *1* Which one is the heaviest, 5h, 3kg, or 20cm? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.0.0b quickfix 2005-12-24 9:44 ` Junio C Hamano @ 2005-12-24 10:16 ` Andreas Ericsson 2005-12-24 12:21 ` Krzysztof Halasa 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Andreas Ericsson @ 2005-12-24 10:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Junio C Hamano Cc: Ingo Oeser, linux-kernel, Linus Torvalds, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, H. Peter Anvin, git Junio C Hamano wrote: > > *1* Which one is the heaviest, 5h, 3kg, or 20cm? > 5h, without a doubt. Because time can be broken down into infinitely small pieces and encompasses all the matter in the universe it will always be heavier and larger than any measurement relating to 3 dimensions or less. Beware of rhetorical questions around people with hangovers in a philosohopical mood. ;) -- Andreas Ericsson andreas.ericsson@op5.se OP5 AB www.op5.se Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.0.0b quickfix 2005-12-24 10:16 ` Andreas Ericsson @ 2005-12-24 12:21 ` Krzysztof Halasa 2005-12-29 23:14 ` H. Peter Anvin 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Krzysztof Halasa @ 2005-12-24 12:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andreas Ericsson Cc: Junio C Hamano, Ingo Oeser, linux-kernel, Linus Torvalds, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, H. Peter Anvin, git Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5.se> writes: >> *1* Which one is the heaviest, 5h, 3kg, or 20cm? >> > > 5h, without a doubt. Because time can be broken down into infinitely > small pieces This is uncertain. If the time is quantified 5 hrs might as well contain much less quanta than 3 kg, let alone 20 cm :-) -- Krzysztof Halasa ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.0.0b quickfix 2005-12-24 12:21 ` Krzysztof Halasa @ 2005-12-29 23:14 ` H. Peter Anvin 0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: H. Peter Anvin @ 2005-12-29 23:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Krzysztof Halasa Cc: Andreas Ericsson, Junio C Hamano, Ingo Oeser, linux-kernel, Linus Torvalds, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, git Krzysztof Halasa wrote: > > This is uncertain. If the time is quantified 5 hrs might as well contain > much less quanta than 3 kg, let alone 20 cm :-) You're forgetting that if time is quantized, it's as part of a general quantization of space-time. Thus, there would be as many quanta in 5 hrs as in 539,626,442,400,000 cm. -hpa ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-12-29 23:15 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2005-12-21 22:34 [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.0.0b quickfix Junio C Hamano 2005-12-21 23:12 ` H. Peter Anvin 2005-12-22 9:39 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt 2005-12-22 17:46 ` Linus Torvalds 2005-12-23 16:12 ` Ingo Oeser 2005-12-24 9:44 ` Junio C Hamano 2005-12-24 10:16 ` Andreas Ericsson 2005-12-24 12:21 ` Krzysztof Halasa 2005-12-29 23:14 ` H. Peter Anvin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).