linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] x86_64: cleanup setup_node_zones called by paging_init
@ 2008-01-09  3:34 Yinghai Lu
  2008-01-09 17:49 ` Christoph Lameter
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Yinghai Lu @ 2008-01-09  3:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Morton, Ingo Molnar, Thomas Gleixner, Christoph Lameter; +Cc: LKML

[PATCH] x86_64: cleanup setup_node_zones called by paging_init

setup_node_zones calcuates some variable but only use them when FLAT_NODE_MEM_MAP is set

so change the MACRO postion to avoid calculating.

also change it to static

Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai.lu@sun.com>

Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
@@ -227,15 +227,16 @@ void __init setup_node_bootmem(int nodei
 	srat_reserve_add_area(nodeid);
 #endif
 	node_set_online(nodeid);
-} 
+}
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_FLAT_NODE_MEM_MAP
 /* Initialize final allocator for a zone */
-void __init setup_node_zones(int nodeid)
-{ 
+static void __init setup_node_zones(int nodeid)
+{
 	unsigned long start_pfn, end_pfn, memmapsize, limit;
 
- 	start_pfn = node_start_pfn(nodeid);
- 	end_pfn = node_end_pfn(nodeid);
+	start_pfn = node_start_pfn(nodeid);
+	end_pfn = node_end_pfn(nodeid);
 
 	Dprintk(KERN_INFO "Setting up memmap for node %d %lx-%lx\n",
 		nodeid, start_pfn, end_pfn);
@@ -244,14 +245,13 @@ void __init setup_node_zones(int nodeid)
 	   memory. */
 	memmapsize = sizeof(struct page) * (end_pfn-start_pfn);
 	limit = end_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
-#ifdef CONFIG_FLAT_NODE_MEM_MAP
-	NODE_DATA(nodeid)->node_mem_map = 
-		__alloc_bootmem_core(NODE_DATA(nodeid)->bdata, 
-				memmapsize, SMP_CACHE_BYTES, 
-				round_down(limit - memmapsize, PAGE_SIZE), 
+	NODE_DATA(nodeid)->node_mem_map =
+		__alloc_bootmem_core(NODE_DATA(nodeid)->bdata,
+				memmapsize, SMP_CACHE_BYTES,
+				round_down(limit - memmapsize, PAGE_SIZE),
 				limit);
+}
 #endif
-} 
 
 void __init numa_init_array(void)
 {
@@ -570,9 +570,11 @@ void __init paging_init(void)
 	sparse_memory_present_with_active_regions(MAX_NUMNODES);
 	sparse_init();
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_FLAT_NODE_MEM_MAP
 	for_each_online_node(i) {
-		setup_node_zones(i); 
+		setup_node_zones(i);
 	}
+#endif
 
 	free_area_init_nodes(max_zone_pfns);
 } 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] x86_64: cleanup setup_node_zones called by paging_init
  2008-01-09  3:34 [PATCH] x86_64: cleanup setup_node_zones called by paging_init Yinghai Lu
@ 2008-01-09 17:49 ` Christoph Lameter
  2008-01-09 18:30   ` [PATCH] x86_64: cleanup setup_node_zones called by paging_init v2 Yinghai Lu
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Lameter @ 2008-01-09 17:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yinghai Lu; +Cc: Andrew Morton, Ingo Molnar, Thomas Gleixner, LKML

On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Yinghai Lu wrote:

> [PATCH] x86_64: cleanup setup_node_zones called by paging_init

The whitespace cleanups make it difficult to review the patch. Could you 
send those separately?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] x86_64: cleanup setup_node_zones called by paging_init v2
  2008-01-09 17:49 ` Christoph Lameter
@ 2008-01-09 18:30   ` Yinghai Lu
  2008-01-09 19:11     ` Dave Hansen
  2008-01-09 19:19     ` Christoph Lameter
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Yinghai Lu @ 2008-01-09 18:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christoph Lameter, Andrew Morton, Ingo Molnar, Thomas Gleixner; +Cc: LKML

[PATCH] x86_64: cleanup setup_node_zones called by paging_init v2

setup_node_zones calcuates some variable but only use them when FLAT_NODE_MEM_MAP is set

so change the MACRO postion to avoid calculating.

also change it to static

Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai.lu@sun.com>

Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
@@ -229,8 +229,9 @@ void __init setup_node_bootmem(int nodei
 	node_set_online(nodeid);
 } 
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_FLAT_NODE_MEM_MAP
 /* Initialize final allocator for a zone */
-void __init setup_node_zones(int nodeid)
+static void __init setup_node_zones(int nodeid)
 { 
 	unsigned long start_pfn, end_pfn, memmapsize, limit;
 
@@ -244,14 +245,14 @@ void __init setup_node_zones(int nodeid)
 	   memory. */
 	memmapsize = sizeof(struct page) * (end_pfn-start_pfn);
 	limit = end_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
-#ifdef CONFIG_FLAT_NODE_MEM_MAP
+
 	NODE_DATA(nodeid)->node_mem_map = 
 		__alloc_bootmem_core(NODE_DATA(nodeid)->bdata, 
 				memmapsize, SMP_CACHE_BYTES, 
 				round_down(limit - memmapsize, PAGE_SIZE), 
 				limit);
-#endif
 } 
+#endif
 
 void __init numa_init_array(void)
 {
@@ -570,9 +571,11 @@ void __init paging_init(void)
 	sparse_memory_present_with_active_regions(MAX_NUMNODES);
 	sparse_init();
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_FLAT_NODE_MEM_MAP
 	for_each_online_node(i) {
 		setup_node_zones(i); 
 	}
+#endif
 
 	free_area_init_nodes(max_zone_pfns);
 } 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] x86_64: cleanup setup_node_zones called by paging_init v2
  2008-01-09 18:30   ` [PATCH] x86_64: cleanup setup_node_zones called by paging_init v2 Yinghai Lu
@ 2008-01-09 19:11     ` Dave Hansen
  2008-01-09 19:19     ` Christoph Lameter
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Dave Hansen @ 2008-01-09 19:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yinghai Lu
  Cc: Christoph Lameter, Andrew Morton, Ingo Molnar, Thomas Gleixner, LKML

On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 10:30 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> 
> [PATCH] x86_64: cleanup setup_node_zones called by paging_init v2
> 
> setup_node_zones calcuates some variable but only use them when
> FLAT_NODE_MEM_MAP is set
> 
> so change the MACRO postion to avoid calculating.
> 
> also change it to static 

I just see the patch adding a net of one #ifdef (and 3 lines of .c
file), and I don't consider that a cleanup. :(

If you make the function static, and make sure to cover that Dprintk up
with the #ifdef, I think the compiler should take care of the rest and
just throw away the function.  Then, you won't need to add the second
#ifdef.  You can even kill the brackets in that for loop.

Also, if you're going to be mucking around in there, can you give
setup_node_zones() a better name?  It doesn't exactly setup any zones
any more.  alloc_node_mem_map(), perhaps?  The comment above it is
bogus, too.

-- Dave


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] x86_64: cleanup setup_node_zones called by paging_init v2
  2008-01-09 18:30   ` [PATCH] x86_64: cleanup setup_node_zones called by paging_init v2 Yinghai Lu
  2008-01-09 19:11     ` Dave Hansen
@ 2008-01-09 19:19     ` Christoph Lameter
  2008-01-09 20:34       ` [PATCH] x86_64: cleanup setup_node_zones called by paging_init v3 Yinghai Lu
  2008-01-12 11:26       ` [PATCH] x86_64: cleanup setup_node_zones called by paging_init v2 Yinghai Lu
  1 sibling, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Lameter @ 2008-01-09 19:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yinghai Lu; +Cc: Andrew Morton, Ingo Molnar, Thomas Gleixner, LKML

On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Yinghai Lu wrote:

> +#ifdef CONFIG_FLAT_NODE_MEM_MAP
>  /* Initialize final allocator for a zone */
> -void __init setup_node_zones(int nodeid)
> +static void __init setup_node_zones(int nodeid)
>  { 
>  	unsigned long start_pfn, end_pfn, memmapsize, limit;
>  
> @@ -244,14 +245,14 @@ void __init setup_node_zones(int nodeid)
>  	   memory. */
>  	memmapsize = sizeof(struct page) * (end_pfn-start_pfn);
>  	limit = end_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
> -#ifdef CONFIG_FLAT_NODE_MEM_MAP
> +
>  	NODE_DATA(nodeid)->node_mem_map = 
>  		__alloc_bootmem_core(NODE_DATA(nodeid)->bdata, 
>  				memmapsize, SMP_CACHE_BYTES, 
>  				round_down(limit - memmapsize, PAGE_SIZE), 
>  				limit);
> -#endif
>  } 

Here you could do an 

#else

<empty def of setup_node_zones>

which would avoid the additional #ifdef later.

Also move the for_each statement into that function. 

The current version will have an unused variable i if 
CONFIG_FLAG_NODE_MEM_MAP is not set.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] x86_64: cleanup setup_node_zones called by paging_init v3
  2008-01-09 19:19     ` Christoph Lameter
@ 2008-01-09 20:34       ` Yinghai Lu
  2008-01-10 19:27         ` [PATCH] x86_64: cleanup setup_node_zones called by paging_init v4 Yinghai Lu
  2008-01-12 11:26       ` [PATCH] x86_64: cleanup setup_node_zones called by paging_init v2 Yinghai Lu
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Yinghai Lu @ 2008-01-09 20:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christoph Lameter, Andrew Morton, Ingo Molnar, Thomas Gleixner; +Cc: LKML

[PATCH] x86_64: cleanup setup_node_zones called by paging_init v3

setup_node_zones calcuates some variables but only use them when FLAT_NODE_MEM_MAP is set

so change the MACRO postion to avoid calculating.

also change it to static, rename it to flat_setup_node_zones

Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai.lu@sun.com>

Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
@@ -229,8 +229,9 @@ void __init setup_node_bootmem(int nodei
 	node_set_online(nodeid);
 } 
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_FLAT_NODE_MEM_MAP
 /* Initialize final allocator for a zone */
-void __init setup_node_zones(int nodeid)
+static void __init flat_setup_node_zones(int nodeid)
 { 
 	unsigned long start_pfn, end_pfn, memmapsize, limit;
 
@@ -244,14 +245,16 @@ void __init setup_node_zones(int nodeid)
 	   memory. */
 	memmapsize = sizeof(struct page) * (end_pfn-start_pfn);
 	limit = end_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
-#ifdef CONFIG_FLAT_NODE_MEM_MAP
+
 	NODE_DATA(nodeid)->node_mem_map = 
 		__alloc_bootmem_core(NODE_DATA(nodeid)->bdata, 
 				memmapsize, SMP_CACHE_BYTES, 
 				round_down(limit - memmapsize, PAGE_SIZE), 
 				limit);
+}
+#else
+#define flat_setup_node_zones(i) do {} while (0)
 #endif
-} 
 
 void __init numa_init_array(void)
 {
@@ -571,7 +574,7 @@ void __init paging_init(void)
 	sparse_init();
 
 	for_each_online_node(i) {
-		setup_node_zones(i); 
+		flat_setup_node_zones(i);
 	}
 
 	free_area_init_nodes(max_zone_pfns);

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] x86_64: cleanup setup_node_zones called by paging_init v4
  2008-01-09 20:34       ` [PATCH] x86_64: cleanup setup_node_zones called by paging_init v3 Yinghai Lu
@ 2008-01-10 19:27         ` Yinghai Lu
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Yinghai Lu @ 2008-01-10 19:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christoph Lameter, Andrew Morton, Ingo Molnar, Thomas Gleixner; +Cc: LKML

please check the one against to x86.git mm

[PATCH] x86_64: cleanup setup_node_zones called by paging_init v4

setup_node_zones calcuates some variables but only use them when FLAT_NODE_MEM_MAP is set

so change the MACRO postion to avoid calculating.

also change it to static, and rename it to flat_setup_node_zones

Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai.lu@sun.com>

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
index 8482314..551e359 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
@@ -233,8 +233,9 @@ void __init setup_node_bootmem(int nodeid, unsigned long start,
 	node_set_online(nodeid);
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_FLAT_NODE_MEM_MAP
 /* Initialize final allocator for a zone */
-void __init setup_node_zones(int nodeid)
+static void __init flat_setup_node_zones(int nodeid)
 {
 	unsigned long start_pfn, end_pfn, memmapsize, limit;
 
@@ -250,14 +251,16 @@ void __init setup_node_zones(int nodeid)
 	 */
 	memmapsize = sizeof(struct page) * (end_pfn-start_pfn);
 	limit = end_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
-#ifdef CONFIG_FLAT_NODE_MEM_MAP
+
 	NODE_DATA(nodeid)->node_mem_map =
 		__alloc_bootmem_core(NODE_DATA(nodeid)->bdata,
 				     memmapsize, SMP_CACHE_BYTES,
 				     round_down(limit - memmapsize, PAGE_SIZE),
 				     limit);
-#endif
 }
+#else
+#define flat_setup_node_zones(i) do {} while (0)
+#endif
 
 /*
  * There are unfortunately some poorly designed mainboards around that
@@ -581,7 +584,7 @@ void __init paging_init(void)
 	sparse_init();
 
 	for_each_online_node(i)
-		setup_node_zones(i);
+		flat_setup_node_zones(i);
 
 	free_area_init_nodes(max_zone_pfns);
 }

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] x86_64: cleanup setup_node_zones called by paging_init v2
  2008-01-09 19:19     ` Christoph Lameter
  2008-01-09 20:34       ` [PATCH] x86_64: cleanup setup_node_zones called by paging_init v3 Yinghai Lu
@ 2008-01-12 11:26       ` Yinghai Lu
  2008-01-14 19:48         ` Christoph Lameter
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Yinghai Lu @ 2008-01-12 11:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christoph Lameter, Ingo Molnar; +Cc: Andrew Morton, Thomas Gleixner, LKML

On Wednesday 09 January 2008 11:19:01 am Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> 

Christoph's

x86: 64-bit, make sparsemem vmemmap the only memory model

is in x86.git mm

so we could remove setup_node_zones because it is not needed by SPARSEMEM

please check the following patch.

YH

[PATCH] x86_84: only support sparsemem fix
sparsemem is only one supported, so could remove FLAT_NODE_MEM related code, that is
only needed !SPARSEMEM

Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai.lu@sun.com>

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
index 8482314..4c286b7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
@@ -233,32 +233,6 @@ void __init setup_node_bootmem(int nodeid, unsigned long start,
 	node_set_online(nodeid);
 }
 
-/* Initialize final allocator for a zone */
-void __init setup_node_zones(int nodeid)
-{
-	unsigned long start_pfn, end_pfn, memmapsize, limit;
-
-	start_pfn = node_start_pfn(nodeid);
-	end_pfn = node_end_pfn(nodeid);
-
-	Dprintk(KERN_INFO "Setting up memmap for node %d %lx-%lx\n",
-		nodeid, start_pfn, end_pfn);
-
-	/*
-	 * Try to allocate mem_map at end to not fill up precious <4GB
-	 * memory.
-	 */
-	memmapsize = sizeof(struct page) * (end_pfn-start_pfn);
-	limit = end_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
-#ifdef CONFIG_FLAT_NODE_MEM_MAP
-	NODE_DATA(nodeid)->node_mem_map =
-		__alloc_bootmem_core(NODE_DATA(nodeid)->bdata,
-				     memmapsize, SMP_CACHE_BYTES,
-				     round_down(limit - memmapsize, PAGE_SIZE),
-				     limit);
-#endif
-}
-
 /*
  * There are unfortunately some poorly designed mainboards around that
  * only connect memory to a single CPU. This breaks the 1:1 cpu->node
@@ -580,9 +554,6 @@ void __init paging_init(void)
 	sparse_memory_present_with_active_regions(MAX_NUMNODES);
 	sparse_init();
 
-	for_each_online_node(i)
-		setup_node_zones(i);
-
 	free_area_init_nodes(max_zone_pfns);
 }
 

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] x86_64: cleanup setup_node_zones called by paging_init v2
  2008-01-12 11:26       ` [PATCH] x86_64: cleanup setup_node_zones called by paging_init v2 Yinghai Lu
@ 2008-01-14 19:48         ` Christoph Lameter
  2008-01-18 22:48           ` [PATCH] x86_64: only support sparsemem fix Yinghai Lu
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Lameter @ 2008-01-14 19:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yinghai Lu; +Cc: Ingo Molnar, Andrew Morton, Thomas Gleixner, LKML

On Sat, 12 Jan 2008, Yinghai Lu wrote:

> please check the following patch.

Exactly!

Reviewed-by: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] x86_64: only support sparsemem fix
  2008-01-14 19:48         ` Christoph Lameter
@ 2008-01-18 22:48           ` Yinghai Lu
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Yinghai Lu @ 2008-01-18 22:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ingo Molnar; +Cc: Christoph Lameter, Andrew Morton, Thomas Gleixner, LKML

[PATCH] x86_64: only support sparsemem fix

sparsemem is only one supported, so could remove FLAT_NODE_MEM related, that is
only needed !SPARSEMEM

Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai.lu@sun.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>

--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
@@ -240,35 +240,6 @@ void __init setup_node_bootmem(int nodeid, unsigned long start,
 	node_set_online(nodeid);
 }
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_FLAT_NODE_MEM_MAP
-/* Initialize final allocator for a zone */
-static void __init flat_setup_node_zones(int nodeid)
-{
-	unsigned long start_pfn, end_pfn, memmapsize, limit;
-
-	start_pfn = node_start_pfn(nodeid);
-	end_pfn = node_end_pfn(nodeid);
-
-	Dprintk(KERN_INFO "Setting up memmap for node %d %lx-%lx\n",
-		nodeid, start_pfn, end_pfn);
-
-	/*
-	 * Try to allocate mem_map at end to not fill up precious <4GB
-	 * memory.
-	 */
-	memmapsize = sizeof(struct page) * (end_pfn-start_pfn);
-	limit = end_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
-
-	NODE_DATA(nodeid)->node_mem_map =
-		__alloc_bootmem_core(NODE_DATA(nodeid)->bdata,
-				     memmapsize, SMP_CACHE_BYTES,
-				     round_down(limit - memmapsize, PAGE_SIZE),
-				     limit);
-}
-#else
-#define flat_setup_node_zones(i) do {} while (0)
-#endif
-
 /*
  * There are unfortunately some poorly designed mainboards around that
  * only connect memory to a single CPU. This breaks the 1:1 cpu->node
@@ -600,9 +571,6 @@ void __init paging_init(void)
 	sparse_memory_present_with_active_regions(MAX_NUMNODES);
 	sparse_init();
 
-	for_each_online_node(i)
-		flat_setup_node_zones(i);
-
 	free_area_init_nodes(max_zone_pfns);
 }
 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-01-18 22:43 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-01-09  3:34 [PATCH] x86_64: cleanup setup_node_zones called by paging_init Yinghai Lu
2008-01-09 17:49 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-09 18:30   ` [PATCH] x86_64: cleanup setup_node_zones called by paging_init v2 Yinghai Lu
2008-01-09 19:11     ` Dave Hansen
2008-01-09 19:19     ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-09 20:34       ` [PATCH] x86_64: cleanup setup_node_zones called by paging_init v3 Yinghai Lu
2008-01-10 19:27         ` [PATCH] x86_64: cleanup setup_node_zones called by paging_init v4 Yinghai Lu
2008-01-12 11:26       ` [PATCH] x86_64: cleanup setup_node_zones called by paging_init v2 Yinghai Lu
2008-01-14 19:48         ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-18 22:48           ` [PATCH] x86_64: only support sparsemem fix Yinghai Lu

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).