* RE: [PATCH 5.4 00/60] 5.4.238-rc1 review
2023-03-20 14:54 [PATCH 5.4 00/60] 5.4.238-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2023-03-20 17:19 ` Chris Paterson
2023-03-20 18:46 ` Florian Fainelli
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Chris Paterson @ 2023-03-20 17:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow
Hello Greg,
> From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Sent: 20 March 2023 14:54
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.238 release.
> There are 60 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 22 Mar 2023 14:54:16 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
CIP configurations built and booted with Linux 5.4.238-rc1 (1f8869b1deb8):
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/pipelines/812172171/
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/commits/linux-5.4.y
Tested-by: Chris Paterson (CIP) <chris.paterson2@renesas.com>
Kind regards, Chris
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/60] 5.4.238-rc1 review
2023-03-20 14:54 [PATCH 5.4 00/60] 5.4.238-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-03-20 17:19 ` Chris Paterson
@ 2023-03-20 18:46 ` Florian Fainelli
2023-03-20 20:36 ` Naresh Kamboju
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2023-03-20 18:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow
On 3/20/23 07:54, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.238 release.
> There are 60 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 22 Mar 2023 14:54:16 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.238-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/60] 5.4.238-rc1 review
2023-03-20 14:54 [PATCH 5.4 00/60] 5.4.238-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-03-20 17:19 ` Chris Paterson
2023-03-20 18:46 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2023-03-20 20:36 ` Naresh Kamboju
2023-03-20 23:14 ` Shuah Khan
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2023-03-20 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow
On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 at 20:26, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.238 release.
> There are 60 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 22 Mar 2023 14:54:16 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.238-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
## Build
* kernel: 5.4.238-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.4.y
* git commit: 1f8869b1deb887d66df4ca79b9e905f21ddfe1e0
* git describe: v5.4.237-61-g1f8869b1deb8
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.4.y/build/v5.4.237-61-g1f8869b1deb8
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.4.237)
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.4.237)
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.4.237)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.4.237)
## Test result summary
total: 92175, pass: 73460, fail: 2062, skip: 16591, xfail: 62
## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 146 total, 145 passed, 1 failed
* arm64: 46 total, 42 passed, 4 failed
* i386: 28 total, 22 passed, 6 failed
* mips: 30 total, 29 passed, 1 failed
* parisc: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 33 total, 32 passed, 1 failed
* riscv: 15 total, 12 passed, 3 failed
* s390: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 14 total, 12 passed, 2 failed
* sparc: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 39 total, 37 passed, 2 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* perf
* rcutorture
* v4l2-compliance
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/60] 5.4.238-rc1 review
2023-03-20 14:54 [PATCH 5.4 00/60] 5.4.238-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2023-03-20 20:36 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2023-03-20 23:14 ` Shuah Khan
2023-03-20 23:37 ` Shuah Khan
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2023-03-20 23:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, Shuah Khan
On 3/20/23 08:54, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.238 release.
> There are 60 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 22 Mar 2023 14:54:16 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.238-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/60] 5.4.238-rc1 review
2023-03-20 14:54 [PATCH 5.4 00/60] 5.4.238-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2023-03-20 23:14 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2023-03-20 23:37 ` Shuah Khan
2023-03-21 5:07 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
2023-03-21 11:54 ` Jon Hunter
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2023-03-20 23:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, Shuah Khan
On 3/20/23 08:54, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.238 release.
> There are 60 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 22 Mar 2023 14:54:16 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.238-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/60] 5.4.238-rc1 review
2023-03-20 14:54 [PATCH 5.4 00/60] 5.4.238-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2023-03-20 23:37 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2023-03-21 5:07 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
2023-03-21 11:54 ` Jon Hunter
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Harshit Mogalapalli @ 2023-03-21 5:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, Vegard Nossum, Darren Kenny
Hi Greg,
On 20/03/23 8:24 pm, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.238 release.
> There are 60 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
No problems detected on x86_64 and aarch64.
Tested-by: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com>
Thanks,
Harshit
> Responses should be made by Wed, 22 Mar 2023 14:54:16 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.238-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/60] 5.4.238-rc1 review
2023-03-20 14:54 [PATCH 5.4 00/60] 5.4.238-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2023-03-21 5:07 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
@ 2023-03-21 11:54 ` Jon Hunter
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2023-03-21 11:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow,
linux-tegra
On 20/03/2023 14:54, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.238 release.
> There are 60 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 22 Mar 2023 14:54:16 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.238-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra.
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Due to infrastructure issues, no test report available, but all tests
are passing.
Jon
--
nvpublic
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread