From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: devkmsg: was [PATCH next v2 3/3] printk: remove logbuf_lock, add syslog_lock
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 16:52:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <X8pbQ94Buqxhlqsk@alley> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201201205341.3871-4-john.ogness@linutronix.de>
On Tue 2020-12-01 21:59:41, John Ogness wrote:
> Since the ringbuffer is lockless, there is no need for it to be
> protected by @logbuf_lock. Remove @logbuf_lock.
I am going to split the feedback into few mails. It might make sense
to split also this patch into few more pieces that would remove the lock
from a particular interface.
> diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c
> index e9018c4e1b66..7385101210be 100644
> --- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
> +++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
> @@ -785,7 +749,6 @@ static loff_t devkmsg_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence)
> if (offset)
> return -ESPIPE;
>
> - logbuf_lock_irq();
user->seq manipulation is not longer safe from the atomicity point of view.
One solution would be to use atomic variable in struct devkmsg_user().
Another solution would be to synchronize it with user->lock like we do
in devkmsg_read().
user->lock looks like an overhead. But it actually would make sense to
prevent seek in the middle of a read.
> switch (whence) {
> case SEEK_SET:
> /* the first record */
> @@ -820,7 +782,6 @@ static __poll_t devkmsg_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait)
>
> poll_wait(file, &log_wait, wait);
>
> - logbuf_lock_irq();
> if (prb_read_valid(prb, user->seq, NULL)) {
Same here. The atomicity of user->seq read/write is not guaranteed.
> /* return error when data has vanished underneath us */
> if (user->seq < prb_first_valid_seq(prb))
Best Regards,
Petr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-04 15:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-01 20:53 [PATCH next v2 0/3] printk: remove logbuf_lock John Ogness
2020-12-01 20:53 ` [PATCH next v2 1/3] printk: inline log_output(),log_store() in vprintk_store() John Ogness
2020-12-03 15:57 ` Petr Mladek
2020-12-03 16:25 ` John Ogness
2020-12-04 6:13 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-12-04 8:26 ` Petr Mladek
2020-12-01 20:53 ` [PATCH next v2 2/3] printk: change @clear_seq to atomic64_t John Ogness
2020-12-04 9:12 ` Petr Mladek
2020-12-06 20:23 ` John Ogness
2020-12-07 9:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-07 10:03 ` John Ogness
2020-12-07 12:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-07 12:56 ` Petr Mladek
2020-12-07 16:46 ` David Laight
2020-12-08 20:34 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-12-08 22:30 ` John Ogness
2020-12-09 1:04 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-12-09 8:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-09 9:22 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-12-09 10:46 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-12-09 11:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-09 11:28 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-12-09 12:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-09 8:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-01 20:53 ` [PATCH next v2 3/3] printk: remove logbuf_lock, add syslog_lock John Ogness
2020-12-04 6:41 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-12-06 20:44 ` John Ogness
2020-12-04 15:52 ` Petr Mladek [this message]
2020-12-06 20:51 ` devkmsg: was " John Ogness
2020-12-07 9:56 ` Petr Mladek
2020-12-04 15:57 ` syslog: was: " Petr Mladek
2020-12-06 21:06 ` John Ogness
2020-12-07 10:01 ` Petr Mladek
2020-12-04 16:10 ` recursion handling: " Petr Mladek
2020-12-05 4:25 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-12-06 22:08 ` John Ogness
2020-12-05 9:41 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-12-06 22:17 ` John Ogness
2020-12-06 21:44 ` John Ogness
2020-12-07 11:17 ` Petr Mladek
2020-12-04 16:15 ` vprintk_store: was: " Petr Mladek
2020-12-06 22:30 ` John Ogness
2020-12-07 12:46 ` Petr Mladek
2020-12-04 16:19 ` consoles: " Petr Mladek
2020-12-05 4:39 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-12-07 9:50 ` Petr Mladek
2020-12-08 20:51 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=X8pbQ94Buqxhlqsk@alley \
--to=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).