linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] regulator: core: Use ktime_get_boottime() to determine how long a regulator was off
@ 2023-02-22 19:15 Matthias Kaehlcke
  2023-02-22 20:46 ` Stephen Boyd
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Matthias Kaehlcke @ 2023-02-22 19:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Liam Girdwood, Mark Brown
  Cc: Stephen Boyd, Douglas Anderson, linux-kernel, Matthias Kaehlcke

For regulators with 'off-on-delay-us' the regulator framework currently
uses ktime_get() to determine how long the regulator has been off
before re-enabling it (after a delay if needed). A problem with using
ktime_get() is that it doesn't account for the time the system is
suspended. As a result a regulator with a longer 'off-on-delay' (e.g.
500ms) that was switched off during suspend might still incurr in a
delay on resume before it is re-enabled, even though the regulator
might have been off for hours. ktime_get_boottime() accounts for
suspend time, use it instead of ktime_get().

Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
---

 drivers/regulator/core.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index ae69e493913d..4fcd36055b02 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -1584,7 +1584,7 @@ static int set_machine_constraints(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
 	}
 
 	if (rdev->desc->off_on_delay)
-		rdev->last_off = ktime_get();
+		rdev->last_off = ktime_get_boottime();
 
 	/* If the constraints say the regulator should be on at this point
 	 * and we have control then make sure it is enabled.
@@ -2673,7 +2673,7 @@ static int _regulator_do_enable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
 		 * this regulator was disabled.
 		 */
 		ktime_t end = ktime_add_us(rdev->last_off, rdev->desc->off_on_delay);
-		s64 remaining = ktime_us_delta(end, ktime_get());
+		s64 remaining = ktime_us_delta(end, ktime_get_boottime());
 
 		if (remaining > 0)
 			_regulator_delay_helper(remaining);
@@ -2912,7 +2912,7 @@ static int _regulator_do_disable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
 	}
 
 	if (rdev->desc->off_on_delay)
-		rdev->last_off = ktime_get();
+		rdev->last_off = ktime_get_boottime();
 
 	trace_regulator_disable_complete(rdev_get_name(rdev));
 
-- 
2.39.2.722.g9855ee24e9-goog


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] regulator: core: Use ktime_get_boottime() to determine how long a regulator was off
  2023-02-22 19:15 [PATCH] regulator: core: Use ktime_get_boottime() to determine how long a regulator was off Matthias Kaehlcke
@ 2023-02-22 20:46 ` Stephen Boyd
  2023-02-23  0:05   ` Matthias Kaehlcke
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Boyd @ 2023-02-22 20:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Liam Girdwood, Mark Brown, Matthias Kaehlcke
  Cc: Douglas Anderson, linux-kernel

Quoting Matthias Kaehlcke (2023-02-22 11:15:46)
> For regulators with 'off-on-delay-us' the regulator framework currently
> uses ktime_get() to determine how long the regulator has been off
> before re-enabling it (after a delay if needed). A problem with using
> ktime_get() is that it doesn't account for the time the system is
> suspended. As a result a regulator with a longer 'off-on-delay' (e.g.
> 500ms) that was switched off during suspend might still incurr in a
> delay on resume before it is re-enabled, even though the regulator
> might have been off for hours. ktime_get_boottime() accounts for
> suspend time, use it instead of ktime_get().
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
> ---

Is it fixing something in stable kernels? Should it be tagged for
stable?

Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] regulator: core: Use ktime_get_boottime() to determine how long a regulator was off
  2023-02-22 20:46 ` Stephen Boyd
@ 2023-02-23  0:05   ` Matthias Kaehlcke
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Matthias Kaehlcke @ 2023-02-23  0:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Boyd; +Cc: Liam Girdwood, Mark Brown, Douglas Anderson, linux-kernel

On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 03:46:39PM -0500, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Matthias Kaehlcke (2023-02-22 11:15:46)
> > For regulators with 'off-on-delay-us' the regulator framework currently
> > uses ktime_get() to determine how long the regulator has been off
> > before re-enabling it (after a delay if needed). A problem with using
> > ktime_get() is that it doesn't account for the time the system is
> > suspended. As a result a regulator with a longer 'off-on-delay' (e.g.
> > 500ms) that was switched off during suspend might still incurr in a
> > delay on resume before it is re-enabled, even though the regulator
> > might have been off for hours. ktime_get_boottime() accounts for
> > suspend time, use it instead of ktime_get().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
> > ---
> 
> Is it fixing something in stable kernels? Should it be tagged for
> stable?

It's not a super-critical fix, but it could improve resume time for
some devices with stable kernels, so it might be worth adding it to
stable. I'll send out a a v2 with the corresponding tags.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-02-23  0:05 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-02-22 19:15 [PATCH] regulator: core: Use ktime_get_boottime() to determine how long a regulator was off Matthias Kaehlcke
2023-02-22 20:46 ` Stephen Boyd
2023-02-23  0:05   ` Matthias Kaehlcke

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).