From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"Michael Kelley (LINUX)" <mikelley@microsoft.com>,
"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
KY Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
"wei.liu@kernel.org" <wei.liu@kernel.org>,
Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>,
"luto@kernel.org" <luto@kernel.org>,
"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"edumazet@google.com" <edumazet@google.com>,
"kuba@kernel.org" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"pabeni@redhat.com" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"lpieralisi@kernel.org" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"robh@kernel.org" <robh@kernel.org>,
"kw@linux.com" <kw@linux.com>,
"bhelgaas@google.com" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"arnd@arndb.de" <arnd@arndb.de>, "hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>,
"m.szyprowski@samsung.com" <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
"robin.murphy@arm.com" <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
"thomas.lendacky@amd.com" <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
"brijesh.singh@amd.com" <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"dave.hansen@linux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@microsoft.com>,
"kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com"
<kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
"sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com"
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
"ak@linux.intel.com" <ak@linux.intel.com>,
"isaku.yamahata@intel.com" <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>,
"dan.j.williams@intel.com" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
"jane.chu@oracle.com" <jane.chu@oracle.com>,
"tony.luck@intel.com" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
"iommu@lists.linux.dev" <iommu@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/14] x86/ioremap: Support hypervisor specified range to map as encrypted
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2023 20:57:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y+av0SVUHBLCVdWE@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y+auMQ88In7NEc30@google.com>
On Fri, Feb 10, 2023, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2023, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > On 2/10/23 11:36, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > >> One approach is to go with the individual device attributes for now.>> If the list does grow significantly, there will probably be patterns
> > >> or groupings that we can't discern now. We could restructure into
> > >> larger buckets at that point based on those patterns/groupings.
> > > There's a reason the word "platform" is in cc_platform_has(). Initially
> > > we wanted to distinguish attributes of the different platforms. So even
> > > if y'all don't like CC_ATTR_PARAVISOR, that is what distinguishes this
> > > platform and it *is* one platform.
> > >
> > > So call it CC_ATTR_SEV_VTOM as it uses that technology or whatever. But
> > > call it like the platform, not to mean "I need this functionality".
> >
> > I can live with that. There's already a CC_ATTR_GUEST_SEV_SNP, so it
> > would at least not be too much of a break from what we already have.
>
> I'm fine with CC_ATTR_SEV_VTOM, assuming the proposal is to have something like:
>
> static inline bool is_address_range_private(resource_size_t addr)
> {
> if (cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_SEV_VTOM))
> return is_address_below_vtom(addr);
>
> return false;
> }
>
> i.e. not have SEV_VTOM mean "I/O APIC and vTPM are private". Though I don't see
> the point in making it SEV vTOM specific or using a flag. Despite what any of us
> think about TDX paravisors, it's completely doable within the confines of TDX to
> have an emulated device reside in the private address space. E.g. why not
> something like this?
>
> static inline bool is_address_range_private(resource_size_t addr)
> {
> return addr < cc_platform_private_end;
> }
>
> where SEV fills in "cc_platform_private_end" when vTOM is enabled, and TDX does
> the same. Or wrap cc_platform_private_end in a helper, etc.
Gah, forgot that the intent with TDX is to enumerate devices in their legacy
address spaces. So a TDX guest couldn't do this by default, but if/when Hyper-V
or some other hypervisor moves I/O APIC, vTPM, etc... into the TCB, the common
code would just work and only the hypervisor-specific paravirt code would need
to change.
Probably need a more specific name than is_address_range_private() though, e.g.
is_mmio_address_range_private()?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-10 20:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-12 21:42 [PATCH v5 00/14] Add PCI pass-thru support to Hyper-V Confidential VMs Michael Kelley
2023-01-12 21:42 ` [PATCH v5 01/14] x86/ioapic: Gate decrypted mapping on cc_platform_has() attribute Michael Kelley
2023-01-12 21:42 ` [PATCH v5 02/14] x86/hyperv: Reorder code to facilitate future work Michael Kelley
2023-01-12 21:42 ` [PATCH v5 03/14] Drivers: hv: Explicitly request decrypted in vmap_pfn() calls Michael Kelley
2023-01-12 21:42 ` [PATCH v5 04/14] x86/mm: Handle decryption/re-encryption of bss_decrypted consistently Michael Kelley
2023-01-12 21:42 ` [PATCH v5 05/14] init: Call mem_encrypt_init() after Hyper-V hypercall init is done Michael Kelley
2023-01-12 21:42 ` [PATCH v5 06/14] x86/ioremap: Support hypervisor specified range to map as encrypted Michael Kelley
2023-01-20 20:15 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-01-21 4:10 ` Michael Kelley (LINUX)
2023-01-25 14:55 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-02-02 5:49 ` Michael Kelley (LINUX)
2023-02-07 12:41 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-02-07 19:01 ` Michael Kelley (LINUX)
2023-02-07 19:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-02-07 19:48 ` Michael Kelley (LINUX)
2023-02-07 19:54 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-02-07 19:57 ` Michael Kelley (LINUX)
2023-02-08 0:18 ` Michael Kelley (LINUX)
2023-02-08 15:09 ` Dave Hansen
2023-02-09 17:29 ` Michael Kelley (LINUX)
2023-02-08 17:23 ` Dave Hansen
2023-02-09 17:47 ` Michael Kelley (LINUX)
2023-02-10 18:41 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-02-10 18:58 ` Dave Hansen
2023-02-10 19:03 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-02-10 19:15 ` Michael Kelley (LINUX)
2023-02-10 19:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-02-10 19:58 ` Dave Hansen
2023-02-10 20:50 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-02-10 20:57 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2023-02-10 21:27 ` Michael Kelley (LINUX)
2023-02-10 23:47 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-02-14 7:45 ` Michael Kelley (LINUX)
2023-02-16 13:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-02-16 16:16 ` Michael Kelley (LINUX)
2023-02-16 17:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-02-17 6:16 ` Michael Kelley (LINUX)
2023-02-17 14:55 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-02-22 22:13 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-02-22 22:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-02-22 22:54 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-02-22 23:34 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-02-23 1:21 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-02-23 10:45 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-02-23 20:01 ` Michael Kelley (LINUX)
2023-02-23 20:27 ` Dave Hansen
2023-03-06 21:51 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-03-09 11:12 ` David Woodhouse
2023-03-09 11:59 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-03-09 13:00 ` David Woodhouse
2023-03-09 14:19 ` Tom Lendacky
2023-03-09 14:36 ` Jörg Rödel
2023-03-09 14:45 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-03-09 15:45 ` David Woodhouse
2023-03-09 16:34 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-03-10 10:05 ` David Woodhouse
2023-02-23 20:26 ` Dave Hansen
2023-02-23 20:41 ` Dave Hansen
2023-02-23 20:51 ` Michael Kelley (LINUX)
2023-02-23 21:07 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-02-23 21:15 ` Michael Kelley (LINUX)
2023-02-23 21:24 ` Dave Hansen
2023-01-12 21:42 ` [PATCH v5 07/14] x86/hyperv: Change vTOM handling to use standard coco mechanisms Michael Kelley
2023-01-12 21:42 ` [PATCH v5 08/14] swiotlb: Remove bounce buffer remapping for Hyper-V Michael Kelley
2023-01-12 21:42 ` [PATCH v5 09/14] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Remove second mapping of VMBus monitor pages Michael Kelley
2023-01-12 21:42 ` [PATCH v5 10/14] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Remove second way of mapping ring buffers Michael Kelley
2023-01-12 21:42 ` [PATCH v5 11/14] hv_netvsc: Remove second mapping of send and recv buffers Michael Kelley
2023-01-12 21:42 ` [PATCH v5 12/14] Drivers: hv: Don't remap addresses that are above shared_gpa_boundary Michael Kelley
2023-01-12 21:42 ` [PATCH v5 13/14] PCI: hv: Add hypercalls to read/write MMIO space Michael Kelley
2023-01-12 21:42 ` [PATCH v5 14/14] PCI: hv: Enable PCI pass-thru devices in Confidential VMs Michael Kelley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y+av0SVUHBLCVdWE@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=Tianyu.Lan@microsoft.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=decui@microsoft.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
--cc=jane.chu@oracle.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=mikelley@microsoft.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).