linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	Sander Vanheule <sander@svanheule.net>,
	Alexey Klimov <klimov.linux@gmail.com>,
	Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>,
	linux-riscv <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] lib/cpumask: add FORCE_NR_CPUS config option
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 07:35:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y065nbfVQwZhwt51@yury-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdVeHPR_JH0dJ+WSddjd8_hax70JRzd4pqHLNvgbh+-znw@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 03:50:31PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
> 
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 3:41 PM Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de> wrote:
> > On Okt 18 2022, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > Moreover, this cannot be used on all systems.  E.g. on Icicle Kit with
> > > Microchip PolarFire SoC, CONFIG_NR_CPUS needs to be larger than 4,
> > > as the system has actually 5 CPU cores (1xE51 and 4xU54), but Linux
> > > runs only on 4 of them.  So you cannot use FORCE_NR_CPUS=y.
> >
> > But does Linux acually see the E51 core?  On the Hifive boards it is
> > disabled in the device tree, and the cpu probing just skips it,
> > effectively resulting in only four cpus.
> 
> The E51 is indeed disabled in DT.
> The CPU parts of arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/fu540-c000.dtsi and
> arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/mpfs.dtsi arre very similar.
> Do you get 4 CPUs on Hifive with CONFIG_NR_CPUS=4?
> 
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Hi Geert, Andreas,

Thanks for pointing that. Indeed, it should be disabled in
allmodconfig.

Linus also asked to make this option depending on CONFIG_EXPERT.
So, I'm working on a patch.

From general considerations, NR_CPUS defines length of cpumasks,
per-cpu arrays etc. If it's impossible to boot Linux on a specific
core, we don't need to reserve memory for all that. In other words,
number of possible CPUs in your example should be equal to 4.

When FORCE_NR_CPUS=y, the boot code still parses DT/ACPI tables for
actual numbers of CPUs, and if it doesn't equal to NR_CPUS, prints
a message in syslog. 

For those who choose FORCE_NR_CPUS, it's required to set NR_CPUS
to a value that matches to what's parsed from DT.

Can you please look at the draft below that disables FORCE_NR_CPUS
in allmodconfig? If it's OK with you, I'll send a patch. If you think
that there are architectures where it's not possible to set correct
NR_CPUS at compile time for some reason, I'll add ARCH_UNFORCE_NR_CPUS
option.

Thanks,
Yury
---
 lib/Kconfig | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/lib/Kconfig b/lib/Kconfig
index 9bbf8a4b2108..578cee3593d7 100644
--- a/lib/Kconfig
+++ b/lib/Kconfig
@@ -528,15 +528,33 @@ config CPUMASK_OFFSTACK
 	  them on the stack.  This is a bit more expensive, but avoids
 	  stack overflow.
 
+choice
+	prompt "Number of CPUs detection"
+	default UNFORCE_NR_CPUS
+        depends on SMP && EXPERT
+	help
+	  Select between boot-time and compile-time detection of number
+	  of CPUs. If it's possible to provide exact number of CPUs at
+	  compile-time, kernel code may be optimized better.
+
+	  For general-purpose kernel, choose "boot time" option.
+
+config UNFORCE_NR_CPUS
+	bool "Detect number of CPUs at boot time"
+	help
+	  Choose it if you build general-purpose kernel and want to rely
+	  on kernel to detect actual number of CPUs.
+
 config FORCE_NR_CPUS
        bool "NR_CPUS is set to an actual number of CPUs"
-       depends on SMP
        help
          Say Yes if you have NR_CPUS set to an actual number of possible
          CPUs in your system, not to a default value. This forces the core
          code to rely on compile-time value and optimize kernel routines
          better.
 
+endchoice
+
 config CPU_RMAP
 	bool
 	depends on SMP
-- 
2.34.1


  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-18 14:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-05 23:08 [PATCH v2 0/5] cpumask: cleanup nr_cpu_ids vs nr_cpumask_bits mess Yury Norov
2022-09-05 23:08 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] smp: don't declare nr_cpu_ids if NR_CPUS == 1 Yury Norov
2022-09-06  8:53   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-06 14:06     ` Yury Norov
2022-09-06 14:36       ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-06 15:01         ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-09-06 17:53           ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-06 15:07         ` Yury Norov
2022-09-07  8:02         ` David Laight
2022-09-05 23:08 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] smp: add set_nr_cpu_ids() Yury Norov
2022-09-05 23:08 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] lib/cpumask: delete misleading comment Yury Norov
2022-09-05 23:08 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] lib/cpumask: deprecate nr_cpumask_bits Yury Norov
2022-09-05 23:08 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] lib/cpumask: add FORCE_NR_CPUS config option Yury Norov
2022-10-18  8:21   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-10-18 13:15     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-10-18 13:41       ` Andreas Schwab
2022-10-18 13:50         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-10-18 14:35           ` Yury Norov [this message]
2022-10-18 14:44             ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-10-18 14:59               ` Yury Norov
2022-10-18 15:15                 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-10-18 16:16                   ` Yury Norov
2022-10-19  6:58                     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-09-06  8:55 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] cpumask: cleanup nr_cpu_ids vs nr_cpumask_bits mess Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-06 12:06   ` Valentin Schneider
2022-09-06 14:38     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-06 15:45       ` Valentin Schneider
2022-09-06 16:26         ` Yury Norov
2022-09-06 14:48     ` Yury Norov
2022-09-06 14:35   ` Yury Norov
2022-09-15 14:45 ` Yury Norov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y065nbfVQwZhwt51@yury-laptop \
    --to=yury.norov@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=ebiggers@google.com \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=klimov.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sander@svanheule.net \
    --cc=schwab@suse.de \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).