linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
Cc: acme@kernel.org, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
	jolsa@redhat.com, namhyung@kernel.org, songliubraving@fb.com,
	eranian@google.com, ak@linux.intel.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	frederic@kernel.org, maddy@linux.ibm.com, irogers@google.com,
	will@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	sandipan.das@amd.com, ananth.narayan@amd.com,
	kim.phillips@amd.com, santosh.shukla@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: Rewrite core context handling
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2022 12:23:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y0PykAbq/SLjUqhO@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9d7a9f37-f037-00b8-afd3-72bb840a90df@amd.com>

On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 11:20:53AM +0530, Ravi Bangoria wrote:

> This one was simple enough so I prepared a patch for this. Let
> me know if you see any issues with below diff.

I've extraed this as a separate patch since it's not strictly required
for correctness and the patch is a quite large enough.

> ---
> diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
> index 820c56c66b26..e0232e0bb74e 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> @@ -9807,6 +9807,44 @@ static struct pmu perf_swevent = {
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_EVENT_TRACING
>  
> +static void tp_perf_event_destroy(struct perf_event *event)
> +{
> +	perf_trace_destroy(event);
> +}
> +
> +static int perf_tp_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
> +{
> +	int err;
> +
> +	if (event->attr.type != PERF_TYPE_TRACEPOINT)
> +		return -ENOENT;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * no branch sampling for tracepoint events
> +	 */
> +	if (has_branch_stack(event))
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +	err = perf_trace_init(event);
> +	if (err)
> +		return err;
> +
> +	event->destroy = tp_perf_event_destroy;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct pmu perf_tracepoint = {
> +	.task_ctx_nr	= perf_sw_context,
> +
> +	.event_init	= perf_tp_event_init,
> +	.add		= perf_trace_add,
> +	.del		= perf_trace_del,
> +	.start		= perf_swevent_start,
> +	.stop		= perf_swevent_stop,
> +	.read		= perf_swevent_read,
> +};
> +
>  static int perf_tp_filter_match(struct perf_event *event,
>  				struct perf_sample_data *data)
>  {
> @@ -9856,6 +9894,49 @@ void perf_trace_run_bpf_submit(void *raw_data, int size, int rctx,
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_trace_run_bpf_submit);
>  
> +
> +static void __perf_tp_event_target_task(u64 count, void *record,
> +					struct pt_regs *regs,
> +					struct perf_sample_data *data,
> +					struct perf_event *event)
> +{
> +	struct trace_entry *entry = record;
> +
> +	if (event->attr.config != entry->type)
> +		return;
> +	/* Cannot deliver synchronous signal to other task. */
> +	if (event->attr.sigtrap)
> +		return;
> +	if (perf_tp_event_match(event, data, regs))
> +		perf_swevent_event(event, count, data, regs);
> +}
> +
> +static void perf_tp_event_target_task(u64 count, void *record,
> +				      struct pt_regs *regs,
> +				      struct perf_sample_data *data,
> +				      struct perf_event_context *ctx)
> +{
> +	struct perf_event *event, *sibling;
> +
> +	event = perf_event_groups_first(&ctx->pinned_groups, smp_processor_id(),
> +					&perf_tracepoint, NULL);
> +	for (; event; event = perf_event_groups_next(event, &perf_tracepoint)) {
> +		__perf_tp_event_target_task(count, record, regs, data, event);
> +		for_each_sibling_event(sibling, event) {
> +			__perf_tp_event_target_task(count, record, regs, data, sibling);
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	event = perf_event_groups_first(&ctx->flexible_groups, smp_processor_id(),
> +					&perf_tracepoint, NULL);
> +	for (; event; event = perf_event_groups_next(event, &perf_tracepoint)) {
> +		__perf_tp_event_target_task(count, record, regs, data, event);
> +		for_each_sibling_event(sibling, event) {
> +			__perf_tp_event_target_task(count, record, regs, data, sibling);
> +		}
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  void perf_tp_event(u16 event_type, u64 count, void *record, int entry_size,
>  		   struct pt_regs *regs, struct hlist_head *head, int rctx,
>  		   struct task_struct *task)
> @@ -9886,29 +9967,15 @@ void perf_tp_event(u16 event_type, u64 count, void *record, int entry_size,
>  	 */
>  	if (task && task != current) {
>  		struct perf_event_context *ctx;
> -		struct trace_entry *entry = record;
>  
>  		rcu_read_lock();
>  		ctx = rcu_dereference(task->perf_event_ctxp);
>  		if (!ctx)
>  			goto unlock;
>  
> -		// XXX iterate groups instead, we should be able to
> -		// find the subtree for the perf_tracepoint pmu and CPU.
> -
> -		list_for_each_entry_rcu(event, &ctx->event_list, event_entry) {
> -			if (event->cpu != smp_processor_id())
> -				continue;
> -			if (event->attr.type != PERF_TYPE_TRACEPOINT)
> -				continue;
> -			if (event->attr.config != entry->type)
> -				continue;
> -			/* Cannot deliver synchronous signal to other task. */
> -			if (event->attr.sigtrap)
> -				continue;
> -			if (perf_tp_event_match(event, &data, regs))
> -				perf_swevent_event(event, count, &data, regs);
> -		}
> +		raw_spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
> +		perf_tp_event_target_task(count, record, regs, &data, ctx);
> +		raw_spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
>  unlock:
>  		rcu_read_unlock();
>  	}
> @@ -9917,44 +9984,6 @@ void perf_tp_event(u16 event_type, u64 count, void *record, int entry_size,
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_tp_event);
>  
> -static void tp_perf_event_destroy(struct perf_event *event)
> -{
> -	perf_trace_destroy(event);
> -}
> -
> -static int perf_tp_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
> -{
> -	int err;
> -
> -	if (event->attr.type != PERF_TYPE_TRACEPOINT)
> -		return -ENOENT;
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * no branch sampling for tracepoint events
> -	 */
> -	if (has_branch_stack(event))
> -		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> -
> -	err = perf_trace_init(event);
> -	if (err)
> -		return err;
> -
> -	event->destroy = tp_perf_event_destroy;
> -
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -
> -static struct pmu perf_tracepoint = {
> -	.task_ctx_nr	= perf_sw_context,
> -
> -	.event_init	= perf_tp_event_init,
> -	.add		= perf_trace_add,
> -	.del		= perf_trace_del,
> -	.start		= perf_swevent_start,
> -	.stop		= perf_swevent_stop,
> -	.read		= perf_swevent_read,
> -};
> -
>  #if defined(CONFIG_KPROBE_EVENTS) || defined(CONFIG_UPROBE_EVENTS)
>  /*
>   * Flags in config, used by dynamic PMU kprobe and uprobe
> 
> ---

  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-10 10:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-29 11:33 [PATCH] perf: Rewrite core context handling Ravi Bangoria
2022-08-29 12:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-29 14:40   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-01 10:35     ` Ravi Bangoria
2022-09-01 11:29       ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-05  4:40         ` Ravi Bangoria
2022-09-06  5:50 ` Ravi Bangoria
2022-10-10 10:23   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2022-10-10 11:01     ` Ravi Bangoria
2022-09-07 11:28 ` Ravi Bangoria
2022-10-10 10:14   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-10 10:59     ` Ravi Bangoria

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y0PykAbq/SLjUqhO@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ananth.narayan@amd.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=kim.phillips@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sandipan.das@amd.com \
    --cc=santosh.shukla@amd.com \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).