linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: Balamanikandan Gunasundar  <balamanikandan.gunasundar@microchip.com>
Cc: ludovic.desroches@microchip.com, ulf.hansson@linaro.org,
	nicolas.ferre@microchip.com, alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com,
	3chas3@gmail.com, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-atm-general@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: atmel-mci: Convert to gpio descriptors
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 14:41:51 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y21+L01BcPQ35FYi@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221109043845.16617-1-balamanikandan.gunasundar@microchip.com>

Hi Balamanikandan,

On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 10:08:45AM +0530, Balamanikandan Gunasundar wrote:
> Replace the legacy GPIO APIs with gpio descriptor consumer interface.
> 
> To maintain backward compatibility, we rely on the "cd-inverted"
> property to manage the invertion flag instead of GPIO property.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Balamanikandan Gunasundar <balamanikandan.gunasundar@microchip.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  include/linux/atmel-mci.h    |  4 +-
>  2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c
> index 67b2cd166e56..1df90966e104 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c
> @@ -19,7 +19,8 @@
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/of.h>
>  #include <linux/of_device.h>
> -#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
> +#include <linux/irq.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>  #include <linux/scatterlist.h>
>  #include <linux/seq_file.h>
> @@ -389,8 +390,8 @@ struct atmel_mci_slot {
>  #define ATMCI_CARD_NEED_INIT	1
>  #define ATMCI_SHUTDOWN		2
>  
> -	int			detect_pin;
> -	int			wp_pin;
> +	struct gpio_desc        *detect_pin;
> +	struct gpio_desc	*wp_pin;
>  	bool			detect_is_active_high;
>  
>  	struct timer_list	detect_timer;
> @@ -638,7 +639,11 @@ atmci_of_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  			pdata->slot[slot_id].bus_width = 1;
>  
>  		pdata->slot[slot_id].detect_pin =
> -			of_get_named_gpio(cnp, "cd-gpios", 0);
> +			devm_gpiod_get_from_of_node(&pdev->dev, cnp,
> +						    "cd-gpios",
> +						    0, GPIOD_IN, "cd-gpios");

As I mentioned in another email, please use devm_fwnode_gpiod_get()
instead of devm_gpiod_get_from_of_node() which is going away.

> +		if (IS_ERR(pdata->slot[slot_id].detect_pin))
> +			pdata->slot[slot_id].detect_pin = NULL;

I think it would be much better if we had proper error handling and did
something like:

		err = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(pdata->slot[slot_id].detect_pin);
		if (err) {
			if (err != -ENOENT)
				return ERR_PTR(err);
			pdata->slot[slot_id].detect_pin = NULL;
		}

This will help with proper deferral handling.

>  
>  		pdata->slot[slot_id].detect_is_active_high =
>  			of_property_read_bool(cnp, "cd-inverted");

Instead of doing gpiod_set_value_raw() below I would recommend handling
it here via gpiod_is_active_low() and gpiod_toggle_active_low() and
removing the flag from atmel_mci_slot structure.


> @@ -647,7 +652,11 @@ atmci_of_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  			of_property_read_bool(cnp, "non-removable");
>  
>  		pdata->slot[slot_id].wp_pin =
> -			of_get_named_gpio(cnp, "wp-gpios", 0);
> +			devm_gpiod_get_from_of_node(&pdev->dev, cnp,
> +						    "wp-gpios",
> +						    0, GPIOD_IN, "wp-gpios");
> +		if (IS_ERR(pdata->slot[slot_id].wp_pin))
> +			pdata->slot[slot_id].wp_pin = NULL;
>  	}
>  
>  	return pdata;
> @@ -1511,8 +1520,8 @@ static int atmci_get_ro(struct mmc_host *mmc)
>  	int			read_only = -ENOSYS;
>  	struct atmel_mci_slot	*slot = mmc_priv(mmc);
>  
> -	if (gpio_is_valid(slot->wp_pin)) {
> -		read_only = gpio_get_value(slot->wp_pin);
> +	if (slot->wp_pin) {
> +		read_only = gpiod_get_value(slot->wp_pin);

Consider using "cansleep" variants.

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry

      parent reply	other threads:[~2022-11-10 22:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-09  4:38 [PATCH] mmc: atmel-mci: Convert to gpio descriptors Balamanikandan Gunasundar
2022-11-09 12:38 ` Ulf Hansson
2022-11-09 14:48   ` Linus Walleij
2022-11-10 22:33     ` Dmitry Torokhov
2022-11-09 17:16 ` Andrew Lunn
2022-11-10  8:05   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-11-10  9:02     ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-11-10 22:41 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y21+L01BcPQ35FYi@google.com \
    --to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=3chas3@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=balamanikandan.gunasundar@microchip.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-atm-general@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ludovic.desroches@microchip.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).