From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, sassmann@redhat.com,
Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>,
Patryk Piotrowski <patryk.piotrowski@intel.com>,
SlawomirX Laba <slawomirx.laba@intel.com>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"moderated list:INTEL ETHERNET DRIVERS"
<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] iavf: Do not restart Tx queues after reset task failure
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2022 20:20:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y2vvbwkvAIOdtZaA@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221108102502.2147389-1-ivecera@redhat.com>
On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 11:25:02AM +0100, Ivan Vecera wrote:
> After commit aa626da947e9 ("iavf: Detach device during reset task")
> the device is detached during reset task and re-attached at its end.
> The problem occurs when reset task fails because Tx queues are
> restarted during device re-attach and this leads later to a crash.
<...>
> + if (netif_running(netdev)) {
> + /* Close device to ensure that Tx queues will not be started
> + * during netif_device_attach() at the end of the reset task.
> + */
> + rtnl_lock();
> + dev_close(netdev);
> + rtnl_unlock();
> + }
Sorry for my naive question, I see this pattern a lot (including RDMA),
so curious. Everyone checks netif_running() outside of rtnl_lock, while
dev_close() changes state bit __LINK_STATE_START. Shouldn't rtnl_lock()
placed before netif_running()?
Thanks
> +
> dev_err(&adapter->pdev->dev, "failed to allocate resources during reinit\n");
> reset_finish:
> rtnl_lock();
> --
> 2.37.4
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-09 18:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-08 10:25 [PATCH net] iavf: Do not restart Tx queues after reset task failure Ivan Vecera
2022-11-08 16:40 ` Jacob Keller
2022-11-09 18:20 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2022-11-09 20:11 ` Keller, Jacob E
2022-11-10 9:17 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-11-10 14:51 ` Ivan Vecera
2022-11-10 17:07 ` Leon Romanovsky
[not found] ` <20221110122418.32414666@kernel.org>
2022-11-10 21:07 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-11-10 21:13 ` Keller, Jacob E
2022-11-18 14:30 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jankowski, Konrad0
2022-11-18 14:31 ` Jankowski, Konrad0
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y2vvbwkvAIOdtZaA@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=ivecera@redhat.com \
--cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=patryk.piotrowski@intel.com \
--cc=sassmann@redhat.com \
--cc=slawomirx.laba@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).