* Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/37] 4.19.271-rc1 review
2023-01-22 15:03 [PATCH 4.19 00/37] 4.19.271-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2023-01-23 10:02 ` Naresh Kamboju
2023-01-23 11:21 ` Sudip Mukherjee
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2023-01-23 10:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow
On Sun, 22 Jan 2023 at 20:37, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.271 release.
> There are 37 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Tue, 24 Jan 2023 15:02:08 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.19.271-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.19.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
## Build
* kernel: 4.19.271-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-4.19.y
* git commit: f9f90bbcdb210bd6d0535a24f15019a5ddccf11a
* git describe: v4.19.269-516-gf9f90bbcdb21
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-4.19.y/build/v4.19.269-516-gf9f90bbcdb21
## Test Regressions (compared to v4.19.269-478-g2738270a8760)
## Metric Regressions (compared to v4.19.269-478-g2738270a8760)
## Test Fixes (compared to v4.19.269-478-g2738270a8760)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v4.19.269-478-g2738270a8760)
## Test result summary
total: 112364, pass: 85254, fail: 3276, skip: 23704, xfail: 130
## Build Summary
* arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 323 total, 316 passed, 7 failed
* arm64: 59 total, 58 passed, 1 failed
* i386: 29 total, 28 passed, 1 failed
* mips: 46 total, 46 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 63 total, 63 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 15 total, 15 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 53 total, 52 passed, 1 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* fwts
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* rcutorture
* v4l2-compliance
* vdso
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/37] 4.19.271-rc1 review
2023-01-22 15:03 [PATCH 4.19 00/37] 4.19.271-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-01-23 10:02 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2023-01-23 11:21 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2023-01-23 11:33 ` Pavel Machek
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Sudip Mukherjee @ 2023-01-23 11:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, srw, rwarsow
Hi Greg,
On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 04:03:57PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.271 release.
> There are 37 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Tue, 24 Jan 2023 15:02:08 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20230113):
mips: 63 configs -> no failure
arm: 115 configs -> no failure
arm64: 2 configs -> no failure
x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure
alpha allmodconfig -> no failure
powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure
riscv allmodconfig -> no failure
s390 allmodconfig -> no failure
xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure
Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2694
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>
--
Regards
Sudip
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/37] 4.19.271-rc1 review
2023-01-22 15:03 [PATCH 4.19 00/37] 4.19.271-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-01-23 10:02 ` Naresh Kamboju
2023-01-23 11:21 ` Sudip Mukherjee
@ 2023-01-23 11:33 ` Pavel Machek
2023-01-24 1:16 ` Shuah Khan
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2023-01-23 11:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 661 bytes --]
Hi!
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.271 release.
> There are 37 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-4.19.y
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/37] 4.19.271-rc1 review
2023-01-22 15:03 [PATCH 4.19 00/37] 4.19.271-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2023-01-23 11:33 ` Pavel Machek
@ 2023-01-24 1:16 ` Shuah Khan
2023-01-24 2:47 ` Guenter Roeck
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2023-01-24 1:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, Shuah Khan
On 1/22/23 08:03, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.271 release.
> There are 37 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Tue, 24 Jan 2023 15:02:08 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.19.271-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.19.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/37] 4.19.271-rc1 review
2023-01-22 15:03 [PATCH 4.19 00/37] 4.19.271-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2023-01-24 1:16 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2023-01-24 2:47 ` Guenter Roeck
2023-01-26 8:59 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-01-24 13:08 ` Pavel Machek
2023-01-25 10:30 ` Jon Hunter
6 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2023-01-24 2:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow
On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 04:03:57PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.271 release.
> There are 37 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Tue, 24 Jan 2023 15:02:08 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Build results:
total: 155 pass: 154 fail: 1
Failed builds:
i386:tools/perf
Qemu test results:
total: 426 pass: 426 fail: 0
perf build failure:
util/env.c: In function ‘perf_env__arch’:
cc1: error: function may return address of local variable [-Werror=return-local-addr]
util/env.c:166:17: note: declared here
166 | struct utsname uts;
| ^~~
No one to blame but me, for switching the gcc version used to build perf
to gcc 10.3.0 (from 9.4.0). The problem is fixed in the upstream kernel
with commit ebcb9464a2ae3 ("perf env: Do not return pointers to local
variables"). This patch applies to v5.4.y and earlier kernels.
I'll leave it up to you if you want to apply the fix or not; I'll be
happy to work around the problem in my tests otherwise. Either case,
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
since this is not a new problem.
Thanks,
Guenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/37] 4.19.271-rc1 review
2023-01-24 2:47 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2023-01-26 8:59 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-01-27 16:54 ` Guenter Roeck
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2023-01-26 8:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Guenter Roeck
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 06:47:34PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 04:03:57PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.271 release.
> > There are 37 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Tue, 24 Jan 2023 15:02:08 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
>
> Build results:
> total: 155 pass: 154 fail: 1
> Failed builds:
> i386:tools/perf
> Qemu test results:
> total: 426 pass: 426 fail: 0
>
> perf build failure:
>
> util/env.c: In function ‘perf_env__arch’:
> cc1: error: function may return address of local variable [-Werror=return-local-addr]
> util/env.c:166:17: note: declared here
> 166 | struct utsname uts;
> | ^~~
>
> No one to blame but me, for switching the gcc version used to build perf
> to gcc 10.3.0 (from 9.4.0). The problem is fixed in the upstream kernel
> with commit ebcb9464a2ae3 ("perf env: Do not return pointers to local
> variables"). This patch applies to v5.4.y and earlier kernels.
It's already in the 5.4.y tree (in release 5.4.56), and it applies to
4.19.y so I'll add it there, but it does not apply to 4.14.y so I would
need a working backport for that tree if you want it there.
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/37] 4.19.271-rc1 review
2023-01-26 8:59 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2023-01-27 16:54 ` Guenter Roeck
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2023-01-27 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 09:59:44AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 06:47:34PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 04:03:57PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.271 release.
> > > There are 37 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > >
> > > Responses should be made by Tue, 24 Jan 2023 15:02:08 +0000.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > >
> >
> > Build results:
> > total: 155 pass: 154 fail: 1
> > Failed builds:
> > i386:tools/perf
> > Qemu test results:
> > total: 426 pass: 426 fail: 0
> >
> > perf build failure:
> >
> > util/env.c: In function ‘perf_env__arch’:
> > cc1: error: function may return address of local variable [-Werror=return-local-addr]
> > util/env.c:166:17: note: declared here
> > 166 | struct utsname uts;
> > | ^~~
> >
> > No one to blame but me, for switching the gcc version used to build perf
> > to gcc 10.3.0 (from 9.4.0). The problem is fixed in the upstream kernel
> > with commit ebcb9464a2ae3 ("perf env: Do not return pointers to local
> > variables"). This patch applies to v5.4.y and earlier kernels.
>
> It's already in the 5.4.y tree (in release 5.4.56), and it applies to
> 4.19.y so I'll add it there, but it does not apply to 4.14.y so I would
> need a working backport for that tree if you want it there.
Turns out it won't help. It just uncovers other build failures with gcc-10
on v4.19.y, and it looks like the problem was actually introduced between
v4.14 and v4.19.
I reverted to building perf with gcc-9.
Guenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/37] 4.19.271-rc1 review
2023-01-22 15:03 [PATCH 4.19 00/37] 4.19.271-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2023-01-24 2:47 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2023-01-24 13:08 ` Pavel Machek
2023-01-26 8:56 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-01-25 10:30 ` Jon Hunter
6 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2023-01-24 13:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 812 bytes --]
Hi!
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.271 release.
> There are 37 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
This one makes sense for 5.10, but we don't have followup patches in
4.19, so we don't need this:
> Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
> xhci: Add a flag to disable USB3 lpm on a xhci root port level.
Plus, we have patch in 5.10 which we probably need in 4.19/4.14:
|0c7428f0d 8ccc99 o: 5.10| net/ulp: use consistent error code when blocking ULP
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/37] 4.19.271-rc1 review
2023-01-24 13:08 ` Pavel Machek
@ 2023-01-26 8:56 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2023-01-26 8:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pavel Machek
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee,
srw, rwarsow
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 02:08:09PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.271 release.
> > There are 37 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
>
> This one makes sense for 5.10, but we don't have followup patches in
> 4.19, so we don't need this:
>
> > Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
> > xhci: Add a flag to disable USB3 lpm on a xhci root port level.
Probably, care to send a revert?
> Plus, we have patch in 5.10 which we probably need in 4.19/4.14:
>
> |0c7428f0d 8ccc99 o: 5.10| net/ulp: use consistent error code when blocking ULP
I do not know what this means, please provide a working sha1 and submit
it for inclusion normally.
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/37] 4.19.271-rc1 review
2023-01-22 15:03 [PATCH 4.19 00/37] 4.19.271-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2023-01-24 13:08 ` Pavel Machek
@ 2023-01-25 10:30 ` Jon Hunter
6 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2023-01-25 10:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, linux-tegra
On Sun, 22 Jan 2023 16:03:57 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.271 release.
> There are 37 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Tue, 24 Jan 2023 15:02:08 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.19.271-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.19.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v4.19:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
22 boots: 22 pass, 0 fail
40 tests: 40 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 4.19.271-rc1-gde8db55b044b
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra20-ventana,
tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread