linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2] mm: memcontrol: replace the loop with a list_for_each_entry()
@ 2021-02-04 16:30 Muchun Song
  2021-02-04 17:43 ` Johannes Weiner
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Muchun Song @ 2021-02-04 16:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: hannes, mhocko, vdavydov.dev, akpm
  Cc: cgroups, linux-mm, linux-kernel, Muchun Song

The rule of list walk has gone since:

 commit a9d5adeeb4b2 ("mm/memcontrol: allow to uncharge page without using page->lru field")

So remove the strange comment and replace the loop with a
list_for_each_entry().

There is only one caller of the uncharge_list(). So just fold it into
mem_cgroup_uncharge_list() and remove it.

Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
---
v2:
 - Fold uncharge_list() to mem_cgroup_uncharge_list().

 mm/memcontrol.c | 35 ++++++++---------------------------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index ed5cc78a8dbf..8c035846c7a4 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -6862,31 +6862,6 @@ static void uncharge_page(struct page *page, struct uncharge_gather *ug)
 	css_put(&ug->memcg->css);
 }
 
-static void uncharge_list(struct list_head *page_list)
-{
-	struct uncharge_gather ug;
-	struct list_head *next;
-
-	uncharge_gather_clear(&ug);
-
-	/*
-	 * Note that the list can be a single page->lru; hence the
-	 * do-while loop instead of a simple list_for_each_entry().
-	 */
-	next = page_list->next;
-	do {
-		struct page *page;
-
-		page = list_entry(next, struct page, lru);
-		next = page->lru.next;
-
-		uncharge_page(page, &ug);
-	} while (next != page_list);
-
-	if (ug.memcg)
-		uncharge_batch(&ug);
-}
-
 /**
  * mem_cgroup_uncharge - uncharge a page
  * @page: page to uncharge
@@ -6918,11 +6893,17 @@ void mem_cgroup_uncharge(struct page *page)
  */
 void mem_cgroup_uncharge_list(struct list_head *page_list)
 {
+	struct uncharge_gather ug;
+	struct page *page;
+
 	if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
 		return;
 
-	if (!list_empty(page_list))
-		uncharge_list(page_list);
+	uncharge_gather_clear(&ug);
+	list_for_each_entry(page, page_list, lru)
+		uncharge_page(page, &ug);
+	if (ug.memcg)
+		uncharge_batch(&ug);
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.11.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] mm: memcontrol: replace the loop with a list_for_each_entry()
  2021-02-04 16:30 [PATCH v2] mm: memcontrol: replace the loop with a list_for_each_entry() Muchun Song
@ 2021-02-04 17:43 ` Johannes Weiner
  2021-02-04 18:37 ` Roman Gushchin
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Weiner @ 2021-02-04 17:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Muchun Song; +Cc: mhocko, vdavydov.dev, akpm, cgroups, linux-mm, linux-kernel

On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 12:30:55AM +0800, Muchun Song wrote:
> The rule of list walk has gone since:
> 
>  commit a9d5adeeb4b2 ("mm/memcontrol: allow to uncharge page without using page->lru field")
> 
> So remove the strange comment and replace the loop with a
> list_for_each_entry().
> 
> There is only one caller of the uncharge_list(). So just fold it into
> mem_cgroup_uncharge_list() and remove it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>

Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>

Thank you, Muchun!

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] mm: memcontrol: replace the loop with a list_for_each_entry()
  2021-02-04 16:30 [PATCH v2] mm: memcontrol: replace the loop with a list_for_each_entry() Muchun Song
  2021-02-04 17:43 ` Johannes Weiner
@ 2021-02-04 18:37 ` Roman Gushchin
  2021-02-05  2:53 ` Miaohe Lin
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Roman Gushchin @ 2021-02-04 18:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Muchun Song
  Cc: hannes, mhocko, vdavydov.dev, akpm, cgroups, linux-mm, linux-kernel

On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 12:30:55AM +0800, Muchun Song wrote:
> The rule of list walk has gone since:
> 
>  commit a9d5adeeb4b2 ("mm/memcontrol: allow to uncharge page without using page->lru field")
> 
> So remove the strange comment and replace the loop with a
> list_for_each_entry().
> 
> There is only one caller of the uncharge_list(). So just fold it into
> mem_cgroup_uncharge_list() and remove it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
> ---
> v2:
>  - Fold uncharge_list() to mem_cgroup_uncharge_list().
> 
>  mm/memcontrol.c | 35 ++++++++---------------------------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

Nice cleanup!

Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>

Thanks.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] mm: memcontrol: replace the loop with a list_for_each_entry()
  2021-02-04 16:30 [PATCH v2] mm: memcontrol: replace the loop with a list_for_each_entry() Muchun Song
  2021-02-04 17:43 ` Johannes Weiner
  2021-02-04 18:37 ` Roman Gushchin
@ 2021-02-05  2:53 ` Miaohe Lin
  2021-02-05 15:27 ` Michal Hocko
  2021-02-06  1:00 ` Shakeel Butt
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Miaohe Lin @ 2021-02-05  2:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Muchun Song
  Cc: cgroups, linux-mm, linux-kernel, hannes, mhocko, vdavydov.dev, akpm

Hi:
On 2021/2/5 0:30, Muchun Song wrote:
> The rule of list walk has gone since:
> 
>  commit a9d5adeeb4b2 ("mm/memcontrol: allow to uncharge page without using page->lru field")
> 
> So remove the strange comment and replace the loop with a
> list_for_each_entry().
> 
> There is only one caller of the uncharge_list(). So just fold it into
> mem_cgroup_uncharge_list() and remove it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>

LGTM. Thanks.
Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>

> ---
> v2:
>  - Fold uncharge_list() to mem_cgroup_uncharge_list().
> 
>  mm/memcontrol.c | 35 ++++++++---------------------------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index ed5cc78a8dbf..8c035846c7a4 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -6862,31 +6862,6 @@ static void uncharge_page(struct page *page, struct uncharge_gather *ug)
>  	css_put(&ug->memcg->css);
>  }
>  
> -static void uncharge_list(struct list_head *page_list)
> -{
> -	struct uncharge_gather ug;
> -	struct list_head *next;
> -
> -	uncharge_gather_clear(&ug);
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * Note that the list can be a single page->lru; hence the
> -	 * do-while loop instead of a simple list_for_each_entry().
> -	 */
> -	next = page_list->next;
> -	do {
> -		struct page *page;
> -
> -		page = list_entry(next, struct page, lru);
> -		next = page->lru.next;
> -
> -		uncharge_page(page, &ug);
> -	} while (next != page_list);
> -
> -	if (ug.memcg)
> -		uncharge_batch(&ug);
> -}
> -
>  /**
>   * mem_cgroup_uncharge - uncharge a page
>   * @page: page to uncharge
> @@ -6918,11 +6893,17 @@ void mem_cgroup_uncharge(struct page *page)
>   */
>  void mem_cgroup_uncharge_list(struct list_head *page_list)
>  {
> +	struct uncharge_gather ug;
> +	struct page *page;
> +
>  	if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
>  		return;
>  
> -	if (!list_empty(page_list))
> -		uncharge_list(page_list);
> +	uncharge_gather_clear(&ug);
> +	list_for_each_entry(page, page_list, lru)
> +		uncharge_page(page, &ug);
> +	if (ug.memcg)
> +		uncharge_batch(&ug);
>  }
>  
>  /**
> 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] mm: memcontrol: replace the loop with a list_for_each_entry()
  2021-02-04 16:30 [PATCH v2] mm: memcontrol: replace the loop with a list_for_each_entry() Muchun Song
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-02-05  2:53 ` Miaohe Lin
@ 2021-02-05 15:27 ` Michal Hocko
  2021-02-06  1:00 ` Shakeel Butt
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Michal Hocko @ 2021-02-05 15:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Muchun Song; +Cc: hannes, vdavydov.dev, akpm, cgroups, linux-mm, linux-kernel

On Fri 05-02-21 00:30:55, Muchun Song wrote:
> The rule of list walk has gone since:
> 
>  commit a9d5adeeb4b2 ("mm/memcontrol: allow to uncharge page without using page->lru field")
> 
> So remove the strange comment and replace the loop with a
> list_for_each_entry().
> 
> There is only one caller of the uncharge_list(). So just fold it into
> mem_cgroup_uncharge_list() and remove it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>

Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>

Thanks!

> ---
> v2:
>  - Fold uncharge_list() to mem_cgroup_uncharge_list().
> 
>  mm/memcontrol.c | 35 ++++++++---------------------------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index ed5cc78a8dbf..8c035846c7a4 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -6862,31 +6862,6 @@ static void uncharge_page(struct page *page, struct uncharge_gather *ug)
>  	css_put(&ug->memcg->css);
>  }
>  
> -static void uncharge_list(struct list_head *page_list)
> -{
> -	struct uncharge_gather ug;
> -	struct list_head *next;
> -
> -	uncharge_gather_clear(&ug);
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * Note that the list can be a single page->lru; hence the
> -	 * do-while loop instead of a simple list_for_each_entry().
> -	 */
> -	next = page_list->next;
> -	do {
> -		struct page *page;
> -
> -		page = list_entry(next, struct page, lru);
> -		next = page->lru.next;
> -
> -		uncharge_page(page, &ug);
> -	} while (next != page_list);
> -
> -	if (ug.memcg)
> -		uncharge_batch(&ug);
> -}
> -
>  /**
>   * mem_cgroup_uncharge - uncharge a page
>   * @page: page to uncharge
> @@ -6918,11 +6893,17 @@ void mem_cgroup_uncharge(struct page *page)
>   */
>  void mem_cgroup_uncharge_list(struct list_head *page_list)
>  {
> +	struct uncharge_gather ug;
> +	struct page *page;
> +
>  	if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
>  		return;
>  
> -	if (!list_empty(page_list))
> -		uncharge_list(page_list);
> +	uncharge_gather_clear(&ug);
> +	list_for_each_entry(page, page_list, lru)
> +		uncharge_page(page, &ug);
> +	if (ug.memcg)
> +		uncharge_batch(&ug);
>  }
>  
>  /**
> -- 
> 2.11.0

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] mm: memcontrol: replace the loop with a list_for_each_entry()
  2021-02-04 16:30 [PATCH v2] mm: memcontrol: replace the loop with a list_for_each_entry() Muchun Song
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-02-05 15:27 ` Michal Hocko
@ 2021-02-06  1:00 ` Shakeel Butt
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Shakeel Butt @ 2021-02-06  1:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Muchun Song
  Cc: Johannes Weiner, Michal Hocko, Vladimir Davydov, Andrew Morton,
	Cgroups, Linux MM, LKML

On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 8:39 AM Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> wrote:
>
> The rule of list walk has gone since:
>
>  commit a9d5adeeb4b2 ("mm/memcontrol: allow to uncharge page without using page->lru field")
>
> So remove the strange comment and replace the loop with a
> list_for_each_entry().
>
> There is only one caller of the uncharge_list(). So just fold it into
> mem_cgroup_uncharge_list() and remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>

Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-02-06  4:11 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-02-04 16:30 [PATCH v2] mm: memcontrol: replace the loop with a list_for_each_entry() Muchun Song
2021-02-04 17:43 ` Johannes Weiner
2021-02-04 18:37 ` Roman Gushchin
2021-02-05  2:53 ` Miaohe Lin
2021-02-05 15:27 ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-06  1:00 ` Shakeel Butt

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).