* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/47] 5.10.23-rc2 review
2021-03-10 18:29 [PATCH 5.10 00/47] 5.10.23-rc2 review gregkh
@ 2021-03-10 20:24 ` Pavel Machek
2021-03-11 17:39 ` Greg KH
2021-03-10 21:58 ` Shuah Khan
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2021-03-10 20:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh
Cc: linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage,
pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, stable
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 780 bytes --]
Hi!
> From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.23 release.
> There are 47 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
CIP testing did not find any kernel problems here: (Renesas boards
are still unavailable)
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5.10.y
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/47] 5.10.23-rc2 review
2021-03-10 20:24 ` Pavel Machek
@ 2021-03-11 17:39 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2021-03-11 17:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pavel Machek
Cc: linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage,
jonathanh, f.fainelli, stable
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 09:24:19PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.23 release.
> > There are 47 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
>
> CIP testing did not find any kernel problems here: (Renesas boards
> are still unavailable)
>
> https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5.10.y
>
> Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>
Thanks for testing some of these.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/47] 5.10.23-rc2 review
2021-03-10 18:29 [PATCH 5.10 00/47] 5.10.23-rc2 review gregkh
2021-03-10 20:24 ` Pavel Machek
@ 2021-03-10 21:58 ` Shuah Khan
2021-03-10 23:52 ` Guenter Roeck
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2021-03-10 21:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh, linux-kernel
Cc: torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel,
jonathanh, f.fainelli, stable, Shuah Khan
On 3/10/21 11:29 AM, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.23 release.
> There are 47 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 12 Mar 2021 18:28:23 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.23-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/47] 5.10.23-rc2 review
2021-03-10 18:29 [PATCH 5.10 00/47] 5.10.23-rc2 review gregkh
2021-03-10 20:24 ` Pavel Machek
2021-03-10 21:58 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2021-03-10 23:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-03-11 4:08 ` Ross Schmidt
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2021-03-10 23:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh
Cc: linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel,
jonathanh, f.fainelli, stable
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 07:29:23PM +0100, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.23 release.
> There are 47 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 12 Mar 2021 18:28:23 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Build results:
total: 156 pass: 156 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 432 pass: 432 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Guenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/47] 5.10.23-rc2 review
2021-03-10 18:29 [PATCH 5.10 00/47] 5.10.23-rc2 review gregkh
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2021-03-10 23:52 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2021-03-11 4:08 ` Ross Schmidt
2021-03-11 4:34 ` Florian Fainelli
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Ross Schmidt @ 2021-03-11 4:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh
Cc: linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage,
pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, stable
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 07:29:23PM +0100, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.23 release.
> There are 47 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
Compiled and booted with no regressions on x86_64.
Tested-by: Ross Schmidt <ross.schm.dev@gmail.com>
thanks,
Ross
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/47] 5.10.23-rc2 review
2021-03-10 18:29 [PATCH 5.10 00/47] 5.10.23-rc2 review gregkh
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2021-03-11 4:08 ` Ross Schmidt
@ 2021-03-11 4:34 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-03-11 17:39 ` Greg KH
2021-03-11 6:50 ` Naresh Kamboju
2021-03-11 11:39 ` rudi
6 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2021-03-11 4:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh, linux-kernel
Cc: torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel,
jonathanh, stable
On 3/10/2021 10:29 AM, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.23 release.
> There are 47 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 12 Mar 2021 18:28:23 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.23-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/47] 5.10.23-rc2 review
2021-03-11 4:34 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2021-03-11 17:39 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2021-03-11 17:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Florian Fainelli
Cc: linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage,
pavel, jonathanh, stable
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 08:34:07PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>
>
> On 3/10/2021 10:29 AM, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.23 release.
> > There are 47 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Fri, 12 Mar 2021 18:28:23 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.23-rc2.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:
>
> Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Thanks for testing and letting me know.
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/47] 5.10.23-rc2 review
2021-03-10 18:29 [PATCH 5.10 00/47] 5.10.23-rc2 review gregkh
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2021-03-11 4:34 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2021-03-11 6:50 ` Naresh Kamboju
2021-03-11 11:39 ` rudi
6 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2021-03-11 6:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: open list, Shuah Khan, Florian Fainelli, patches, lkft-triage,
Jon Hunter, linux-stable, Pavel Machek, Andrew Morton,
Linus Torvalds, Guenter Roeck
On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 at 23:59, <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.23 release.
> There are 47 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 12 Mar 2021 18:28:23 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.23-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
Summary
------------------------------------------------------------------------
kernel: 5.10.23-rc2
git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
git branch: linux-5.10.y
git commit: 93276f11b3afe08c3f213a3648483b1a8789673b
git describe: v5.10.22-48-g93276f11b3af
Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.22-48-g93276f11b3af
No regressions (compared to build v5.10.22)
No fixes (compared to build v5.10.22)
Ran 56156 total tests in the following environments and test suites.
Environments
--------------
- arc
- arm
- arm64
- dragonboard-410c
- hi6220-hikey
- i386
- juno-r2
- juno-r2-compat
- juno-r2-kasan
- mips
- nxp-ls2088
- nxp-ls2088-64k_page_size
- parisc
- powerpc
- qemu-arm-clang
- qemu-arm64-clang
- qemu-arm64-kasan
- qemu-i386-clang
- qemu-x86_64-clang
- qemu-x86_64-kasan
- qemu-x86_64-kcsan
- qemu_arm
- qemu_arm64
- qemu_arm64-compat
- qemu_i386
- qemu_x86_64
- qemu_x86_64-compat
- riscv
- s390
- sh
- sparc
- x15
- x86
- x86-kasan
- x86_64
Test Suites
-----------
* build
* linux-log-parser
* install-android-platform-tools-r2600
* kselftest-bpf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-ptrace
* libhugetlbfs
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* v4l2-compliance
* fwts
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-zram
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* ltp-tracing-tests
* network-basic-tests
* perf
* kselftest-
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-lkdtm
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* ltp-controllers-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* kvm-unit-tests
* kunit
* rcutorture
* ssuite
* kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native-
* kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none-
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/47] 5.10.23-rc2 review
2021-03-10 18:29 [PATCH 5.10 00/47] 5.10.23-rc2 review gregkh
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2021-03-11 6:50 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2021-03-11 11:39 ` rudi
2021-03-11 12:38 ` Greg KH
6 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: rudi @ 2021-03-11 11:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh
Cc: linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage,
pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, stable
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 07:29:23PM +0100, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.23 release.
> There are 47 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
The following patch is still missing Pavell's identified missing line
- patch @ https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210310200458.GA12122@amd/
> Jasper St. Pierre <jstpierre@mecheye.net>
> ACPI: video: Add DMI quirk for GIGABYTE GB-BXBT-2807
Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c b/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c
index 811d298637cb..83cd4c95faf0 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c
@@ -147,6 +147,7 @@ static const struct dmi_system_id video_detect_dmi_table[] = {
},
},
{
+ .callback = video_detect_force_vendor,
.ident = "Sony VPCEH3U1E",
.matches = {
DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "Sony Corporation"),
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/47] 5.10.23-rc2 review
2021-03-11 11:39 ` rudi
@ 2021-03-11 12:38 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2021-03-11 12:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rudi
Cc: linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage,
pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, stable
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 11:39:23AM +0000, rudi@heitbaum.com wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 07:29:23PM +0100, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.23 release.
> > There are 47 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
>
> The following patch is still missing Pavell's identified missing line
> - patch @ https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210310200458.GA12122@amd/
It needs to be submitted and accepted upstream properly and then I can
backport it to the stable tree. As it is, this patch is correctly
mirroring what is in 5.11.
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread