From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Justin He <Justin.He@arm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] iomap: new code for 5.13-rc1
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 03:21:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YIt3uKBQnlxHAo/Q@zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AM6PR08MB43769965CAF732F1DEA4A37AF75E9@AM6PR08MB4376.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 03:17:02AM +0000, Justin He wrote:
> Is it a good idea to introduce a new d_path_nolock() for file_dentry_name()?
> In d_path_nolock(), if it detects that there is conflicts with mount_lock
> or rename_lock, then returned NULL as a name of that vfsmount?
Just what does vfsmount have to do with rename_lock? And what's the point
of the entire mess, anyway?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-30 3:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-27 2:58 [GIT PULL] iomap: new code for 5.13-rc1 Darrick J. Wong
2021-04-27 19:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-04-27 19:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-04-27 20:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-04-28 6:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-04-28 6:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-04-28 6:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-04-28 7:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-04-28 7:38 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2021-04-28 8:47 ` Justin He
2021-04-28 16:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-04-29 6:39 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2021-04-29 16:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-04-30 3:17 ` Justin He
2021-04-30 3:21 ` Al Viro [this message]
2021-04-30 6:13 ` Justin He
2021-04-30 18:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-04-30 18:50 ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-04-30 19:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-04-29 6:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-04-27 20:07 ` pr-tracker-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YIt3uKBQnlxHAo/Q@zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=Justin.He@arm.com \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).