linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Xing Zhengjun <zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com>,
	kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	lkp@lists.01.org, lkp@intel.com
Subject: Re: [LKP] [ext4] 05c2c00f37: aim7.jobs-per-min -11.8% regression
Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 12:42:16 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YKfi6Pv+qwduKxuT@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210521092730.GE18952@quack2.suse.cz>

On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 11:27:30AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> 
> OK, thanks for testing. So the orphan code is indeed the likely cause of
> this regression but I probably did not guess correctly what is the
> contention point there. Then I guess I need to reproduce and do more
> digging why the contention happens...

Hmm... what if we only recalculate the superblock checksum when we do
a commit, via the callback function from the jbd2 layer to file
system?

					- Ted

  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-21 16:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-27 12:08 [ext4] 05c2c00f37: aim7.jobs-per-min -11.8% regression kernel test robot
     [not found] ` <a8947cee-11f5-8d59-a3ff-1c516276592e@linux.intel.com>
2021-05-20  9:51   ` [LKP] " Jan Kara
2021-05-21  1:16     ` Xing Zhengjun
2021-05-21  9:27       ` Jan Kara
2021-05-21 16:42         ` Theodore Y. Ts'o [this message]
2021-05-25  9:22           ` Jan Kara
2021-05-25 17:15             ` Theodore Ts'o
2021-05-31 16:57             ` Jan Kara
2021-06-03 16:10               ` Jan Kara
2021-09-03  5:28                 ` Xing Zhengjun
2021-09-03 12:32                   ` Theodore Ts'o

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YKfi6Pv+qwduKxuT@mit.edu \
    --to=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
    --cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
    --cc=zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).