From: "Bradley M. Kuhn" <bkuhn@ebb.org>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
tglx@linutronix.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah@kernel.org,
rafael@kernel.org, rgoldwyn@suse.com, kuno@frob.nl,
fontana@sharpeleven.org, Ciaran.Farrell@suse.com,
Christopher.DeNicolo@suse.com, hch@lst.de, corbet@lwn.net,
linux@leemhuis.info, ast@kernel.org, andriin@fb.com,
daniel@iogearbox.net, atenart@kernel.org, alobakin@pm.me,
weiwan@google.com, ap420073@gmail.com, tj@kernel.org,
jeyu@kernel.org, ngupta@vflare.org,
sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com, minchan@kernel.org,
axboe@kernel.dk, mbenes@suse.com, jpoimboe@redhat.com,
keescook@chromium.org, jikos@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
peterz@infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
copyleft-next@lists.fedorahosted.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] LICENSES: add and use copyleft-next-0.3.1
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2021 10:52:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YOc7dgBq/N5vDjhx@ebb.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YOcakETswyEN58j6@kroah.com>
Greg KH wrote:
> Let's keep it simple please, and not add new licenses for no real good
> reason if at all possible.
I've stated a number of real good reasons to keep copyleft-next as a
dual-licensing option; they seem to have not been refuted here. Indeed, this
point is quite salient:
Joe Perches wrote:
>>> You can ask but it's the submitter's choice to license their code however
>>> they desire.
… to which I'd add, as long as the license is GPLv2-only-compatible, which of
course (GPLv2-only|copyleft-next) is.
Rest is admittedly a bit OT:
Greg also noted:
> I have stated in public many times to companies that try to add
> dual-licensed new kernel code that they should only do so if they provide a
> really good reason
We can agree to disagree on the differences in how company vs. individual
requests and their "good reasons" are handled/prioritized; I think we'd both
agree it's actually moot anyway. While it's an important topic, I apologize
for raising that as it was off-topic to the issue at hand.
On that off-topic point, Tim Bird added:
>> It's not at all purely symbolic to dual license (GPLv2-only|2-Clause-BSD).
>> That dual-licensing has allowed the interchange of a lot of code between
>> the BSD Unixes and Linux, that otherwise would not have happened.
This is a good point, but the same argument is of course valid for
copyleft-next-licensed projects. While there are currently fewer than those
than BSD-ish projects, I don't think Linux should stand on ceremony of “your
project must be this tall to ride this ride” and share code with us … and
then there are the aspirational arguments that I made in my prior email.
--
Bradley M. Kuhn - he/him
Pls. support the charity where I work, Software Freedom Conservancy:
https://sfconservancy.org/supporter/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-08 17:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-07 18:43 [PATCH 0/2] LICENSES: add and use copyleft-next-0.3.1 Luis Chamberlain
2021-07-07 18:43 ` [PATCH 1/2] LICENSES: Add the copyleft-next-0.3.1 license Luis Chamberlain
2021-07-07 18:43 ` [PATCH 2/2] testing: use the copyleft-next-0.3.1 SPDX tag Luis Chamberlain
2021-07-08 4:14 ` [PATCH 0/2] LICENSES: add and use copyleft-next-0.3.1 Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-08 19:00 ` Luis Chamberlain
2021-07-08 6:22 ` Greg KH
2021-07-08 14:59 ` Bradley M. Kuhn
2021-07-08 15:32 ` Greg KH
2021-07-08 16:56 ` Joe Perches
2021-07-08 17:52 ` Bradley M. Kuhn [this message]
2021-07-08 19:01 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-07-08 19:37 ` Luis Chamberlain
2021-07-08 20:08 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-07-08 17:08 ` Tim.Bird
2021-07-08 19:33 ` Luis Chamberlain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YOc7dgBq/N5vDjhx@ebb.org \
--to=bkuhn@ebb.org \
--cc=Christopher.DeNicolo@suse.com \
--cc=Ciaran.Farrell@suse.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alobakin@pm.me \
--cc=andriin@fb.com \
--cc=ap420073@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=atenart@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=copyleft-next@lists.fedorahosted.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=fontana@sharpeleven.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jeyu@kernel.org \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kuno@frob.nl \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@leemhuis.info \
--cc=mbenes@suse.com \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=ngupta@vflare.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rgoldwyn@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=weiwan@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).