From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 4/4] arm64: add host pv-vcpu-state support
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 19:38:40 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YPf5MFV99zPdTu/U@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87h7go2h69.wl-maz@kernel.org>
On (21/07/21 09:40), Marc Zyngier wrote:
> >
> > Can that be cured by just checking vcpu->preempted before calling
> > kvm_update_vcpu_preempted() ?
>
> It isn't obvious to me that this is the right thing to do.
> vcpu->preempted is always updated on sched-out from the preempt
> notifier if the vcpu was on the run-queue, so my guess is that it will
> always be set when switching to another task.
>
> What you probably want is to check whether the vcpu is blocked by
> introspecting the wait-queue with:
>
> scuwait_active(kvm_arch_vcpu_get_wait(vcpu)
>
> which will tell you whether you are blocking or not. We are already
> using a similar construct for arming a background timer in this case.
Can we examine if vcpu->run->exit_reason == WFE/WFI and avoid setting
preempted state if so?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-21 10:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-09 4:37 [PATCHv2 0/4] arm64:kvm: teach guest sched that VCPUs can be preempted Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-07-09 4:37 ` [PATCHv2 1/4] arm64: smccc: Add SMCCC pv-vcpu-state function call IDs Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-07-12 14:22 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-09 4:37 ` [PATCHv2 2/4] arm64: add guest pvstate support Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-07-09 7:39 ` David Edmondson
2021-07-09 7:52 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-07-09 18:58 ` Joel Fernandes
2021-07-09 21:53 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-07-11 16:58 ` Joel Fernandes
2021-07-12 15:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-21 2:05 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-07-21 8:22 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-21 8:47 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-07-21 10:16 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-09 4:37 ` [PATCHv2 3/4] arm64: do not use dummy vcpu_is_preempted() Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-07-12 15:47 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-21 2:06 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-07-09 4:37 ` [PATCHv2 4/4] arm64: add host pv-vcpu-state support Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-07-12 16:24 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20 18:44 ` Joel Fernandes
2021-07-21 8:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-21 10:38 ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2021-07-21 11:08 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-21 1:15 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-07-21 9:10 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YPf5MFV99zPdTu/U@google.com \
--to=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=joelaf@google.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=suleiman@google.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).