linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>,
	Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 2/4] arm64: add guest pvstate support
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2021 08:39:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2v95k2axe.fsf@dme.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210709043713.887098-3-senozhatsky@chromium.org>

On Friday, 2021-07-09 at 13:37:11 +09, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:

> PV-vcpu-state is a per-CPU struct, which, for the time being,
> holds boolean `preempted' vCPU state. During the startup,
> given that host supports PV-state, each guest vCPU sends
> a pointer to its per-CPU variable to the host as a payload
> with the SMCCC HV call, so that host can update vCPU state
> when it puts or loads vCPU.
>
> This has impact on the guest's scheduler:
>
> [..]
>   wake_up_process()
>    try_to_wake_up()
>     select_task_rq_fair()
>      available_idle_cpu()
>       vcpu_is_preempted()
>
> Some sched benchmarks data is available on the github page [0].
>
> [0] https://github.com/sergey-senozhatsky/arm64-vcpu_is_preempted
>
> Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/paravirt.h | 19 +++++++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/paravirt.c      | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c           |  4 ++
>  3 files changed, 117 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/paravirt.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/paravirt.h
> index 9aa193e0e8f2..a3f7665dff38 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/paravirt.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/paravirt.h
> @@ -2,6 +2,11 @@
>  #ifndef _ASM_ARM64_PARAVIRT_H
>  #define _ASM_ARM64_PARAVIRT_H
>  
> +struct vcpu_state {
> +	bool	preempted;
> +	u8	reserved[63];
> +};
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
>  #include <linux/static_call_types.h>
>  
> @@ -20,8 +25,22 @@ static inline u64 paravirt_steal_clock(int cpu)
>  
>  int __init pv_time_init(void);
>  
> +bool dummy_vcpu_is_preempted(unsigned int cpu);
> +
> +extern struct static_key pv_vcpu_is_preempted_enabled;
> +DECLARE_STATIC_CALL(pv_vcpu_is_preempted, dummy_vcpu_is_preempted);
> +
> +static inline bool paravirt_vcpu_is_preempted(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> +	return static_call(pv_vcpu_is_preempted)(cpu);
> +}
> +
> +int __init pv_vcpu_state_init(void);
> +
>  #else
>  
> +#define pv_vcpu_state_init() do {} while (0)
> +
>  #define pv_time_init() do {} while (0)
>  
>  #endif // CONFIG_PARAVIRT
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/paravirt.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/paravirt.c
> index 75fed4460407..d8fc46795d94 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/paravirt.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/paravirt.c
> @@ -40,6 +40,11 @@ struct pv_time_stolen_time_region {
>  
>  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct pv_time_stolen_time_region, stolen_time_region);
>  
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct vcpu_state, vcpus_states);
> +struct static_key pv_vcpu_is_preempted_enabled;
> +
> +DEFINE_STATIC_CALL(pv_vcpu_is_preempted, dummy_vcpu_is_preempted);
> +
>  static bool steal_acc = true;
>  static int __init parse_no_stealacc(char *arg)
>  {
> @@ -165,3 +170,92 @@ int __init pv_time_init(void)
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> +
> +bool dummy_vcpu_is_preempted(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
> +static bool __vcpu_is_preempted(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> +	struct vcpu_state *st;
> +
> +	st = &per_cpu(vcpus_states, cpu);
> +	return READ_ONCE(st->preempted);
> +}
> +
> +static bool has_pv_vcpu_state(void)
> +{
> +	struct arm_smccc_res res;
> +
> +	/* To detect the presence of PV time support we require SMCCC 1.1+ */

"PV VCPU state support" rather than "PV time support".

> +	if (arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit() == SMCCC_CONDUIT_NONE)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
> +			     ARM_SMCCC_HV_PV_VCPU_STATE_FEATURES,
> +			     &res);
> +
> +	if (res.a0 != SMCCC_RET_SUCCESS)
> +		return false;
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
> +static int __pv_vcpu_state_hook(unsigned int cpu, int event)
> +{
> +	struct arm_smccc_res res;
> +	struct vcpu_state *st;
> +
> +	st = &per_cpu(vcpus_states, cpu);
> +	arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(event, virt_to_phys(st), &res);
> +	if (res.a0 != SMCCC_RET_SUCCESS)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int vcpu_state_init(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> +	int ret = __pv_vcpu_state_hook(cpu, ARM_SMCCC_HV_PV_VCPU_STATE_INIT);
> +
> +	if (ret)
> +		pr_warn("Unable to ARM_SMCCC_HV_PV_STATE_INIT\n");
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int vcpu_state_release(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> +	int ret = __pv_vcpu_state_hook(cpu, ARM_SMCCC_HV_PV_VCPU_STATE_RELEASE);
> +
> +	if (ret)
> +		pr_warn("Unable to ARM_SMCCC_HV_PV_STATE_RELEASE\n");
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int pv_vcpu_state_register_hooks(void)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN,
> +				"hypervisor/arm/pvstate:starting",
> +				vcpu_state_init,
> +				vcpu_state_release);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		pr_warn("Failed to register CPU hooks\n");

Include that it's PV VCPU state hooks?

> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int __init pv_vcpu_state_init(void)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (!has_pv_vcpu_state())
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	ret = pv_vcpu_state_register_hooks();
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	static_call_update(pv_vcpu_is_preempted, __vcpu_is_preempted);
> +	static_key_slow_inc(&pv_vcpu_is_preempted_enabled);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> index 6f6ff072acbd..20d42e0f2a99 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@
>  #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
>  #include <asm/ptrace.h>
>  #include <asm/virt.h>
> +#include <asm/paravirt.h>
>  
>  #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
>  #include <trace/events/ipi.h>
> @@ -756,6 +757,9 @@ void __init smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
>  	numa_store_cpu_info(this_cpu);
>  	numa_add_cpu(this_cpu);
>  
> +	/* Init paravirt CPU state */
> +	pv_vcpu_state_init();
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * If UP is mandated by "nosmp" (which implies "maxcpus=0"), don't set
>  	 * secondary CPUs present.
> -- 
> 2.32.0.93.g670b81a890-goog

dme.
-- 
If I could buy my reasoning, I'd pay to lose.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-09  7:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-09  4:37 [PATCHv2 0/4] arm64:kvm: teach guest sched that VCPUs can be preempted Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-07-09  4:37 ` [PATCHv2 1/4] arm64: smccc: Add SMCCC pv-vcpu-state function call IDs Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-07-12 14:22   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-09  4:37 ` [PATCHv2 2/4] arm64: add guest pvstate support Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-07-09  7:39   ` David Edmondson [this message]
2021-07-09  7:52     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-07-09 18:58   ` Joel Fernandes
2021-07-09 21:53     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-07-11 16:58       ` Joel Fernandes
2021-07-12 15:42   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-21  2:05     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-07-21  8:22       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-21  8:47         ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-07-21 10:16           ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-09  4:37 ` [PATCHv2 3/4] arm64: do not use dummy vcpu_is_preempted() Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-07-12 15:47   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-21  2:06     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-07-09  4:37 ` [PATCHv2 4/4] arm64: add host pv-vcpu-state support Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-07-12 16:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20 18:44     ` Joel Fernandes
2021-07-21  8:40       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-21 10:38         ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-07-21 11:08           ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-21  1:15     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-07-21  9:10       ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m2v95k2axe.fsf@dme.org \
    --to=dme@dme.org \
    --cc=joelaf@google.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
    --cc=suleiman@google.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).