linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
Cc: dave.hansen@intel.com, luto@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	x86@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, keescook@chromium.org,
	shakeelb@google.com, vbabka@suse.cz, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, ira.weiny@intel.com,
	dan.j.williams@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 05/19] x86, mm: Use cache of page tables
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2021 11:40:01 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YS3q4Q+ybxweHoLK@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210830235927.6443-6-rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>

On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 04:59:13PM -0700, Rick Edgecombe wrote:
> Change the page table allocation functions defined in pgalloc.h to use
> a cache of physically grouped pages. This will let the page tables be set
> with PKS permissions later.
> 
> For userspace page tables, they are gathered up using mmu gather, and
> freed along with other types of pages in swap.c. Move setting/clearing of
> the PageTable page flag to the allocators so that swap can know to return
> this page to the cache of page tables, and not free it to the page
> allocator. Where it currently is, in the ctor/dtors, causes it to be
> cleared before the page gets to swap.
> 
> Do not set PKS permissions on the page tables, because the page table
> setting functions cannot handle it yet. This will be done in later
> patches.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/pgalloc.h |  6 ++-
>  arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h |  6 +++
>  arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c          | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/asm-generic/pgalloc.h  | 44 ++++++++++++++-----
>  include/linux/mm.h             | 11 +++--
>  mm/swap.c                      |  6 +++
>  mm/swap_state.c                |  5 +++
>  7 files changed, 142 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgalloc.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> index c7ec5bb88334..1ff308ea76cd 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> @@ -7,6 +7,10 @@
>  #include <linux/pagemap.h>
>  
>  #define __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_ALLOC_ONE
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PKS_PG_TABLES
> +#define __HAVE_ARCH_FREE_TABLE
> +#define __HAVE_ARCH_ALLOC_TABLE

I think one define would suffice. If we'd ever have an architecture that
can implement only one of those, we update the ifdefery in
asm-generic/pgalloc.h

> +#endif
>  #define __HAVE_ARCH_PGD_FREE
>  #include <asm-generic/pgalloc.h>
>  
> @@ -162,7 +166,7 @@ static inline void p4d_free(struct mm_struct *mm, p4d_t *p4d)
>  		return;
>  
>  	BUG_ON((unsigned long)p4d & (PAGE_SIZE-1));
> -	free_page((unsigned long)p4d);
> +	free_table(virt_to_page(p4d));
>  }
>  
>  extern void ___p4d_free_tlb(struct mmu_gather *tlb, p4d_t *p4d);

...

> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/pgalloc.h b/include/asm-generic/pgalloc.h
> index 02932efad3ab..e576c19abc8c 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/pgalloc.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/pgalloc.h
> @@ -2,11 +2,26 @@
>  #ifndef __ASM_GENERIC_PGALLOC_H
>  #define __ASM_GENERIC_PGALLOC_H
>  
> +#include <linux/mm.h>
> +

Why is this required?

>  #ifdef CONFIG_MMU
>  
>  #define GFP_PGTABLE_KERNEL	(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO)
>  #define GFP_PGTABLE_USER	(GFP_PGTABLE_KERNEL | __GFP_ACCOUNT)
>  
> +#ifndef __HAVE_ARCH_ALLOC_TABLE
> +static inline struct page *alloc_table(gfp_t gfp)
> +{
> +	return alloc_page(gfp);
> +}
> +#else /* __HAVE_ARCH_ALLOC_TABLE */
> +extern struct page *alloc_table(gfp_t gfp);
> +#endif /* __HAVE_ARCH_ALLOC_TABLE */
> +
> +#ifdef __HAVE_ARCH_FREE_TABLE
> +extern void free_table(struct page *);
> +#endif /* __HAVE_ARCH_FREE_TABLE */
> +
>  /**
>   * __pte_alloc_one_kernel - allocate a page for PTE-level kernel page table
>   * @mm: the mm_struct of the current context

...

> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index c13c7af7cad3..ab63d5a201cb 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -2327,6 +2327,13 @@ static inline bool ptlock_init(struct page *page) { return true; }
>  static inline void ptlock_free(struct page *page) {}
>  #endif /* USE_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS */
>  
> +#ifndef CONFIG_PKS_PG_TABLES
> +static inline void free_table(struct page *table_page)
> +{
> +	__free_pages(table_page, 0);
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_PKS_PG_TABLES */
> +

Can't this live in asm-generic/pgalloc.h?
Then you won't need to include linux/mm.h there.

>  static inline void pgtable_init(void)
>  {
>  	ptlock_cache_init();
> @@ -2337,7 +2344,6 @@ static inline bool pgtable_pte_page_ctor(struct page *page)
>  {
>  	if (!ptlock_init(page))
>  		return false;
> -	__SetPageTable(page);

This change is only valid when __HAVE_ARCH_ALLOC_TABLE is set.

>  	inc_lruvec_page_state(page, NR_PAGETABLE);
>  	return true;
>  }
> @@ -2345,7 +2351,6 @@ static inline bool pgtable_pte_page_ctor(struct page *page)
>  static inline void pgtable_pte_page_dtor(struct page *page)
>  {
>  	ptlock_free(page);
> -	__ClearPageTable(page);
>  	dec_lruvec_page_state(page, NR_PAGETABLE);
>  }
>  

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-31  8:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-30 23:59 [RFC PATCH v2 00/19] PKS write protected page tables Rick Edgecombe
2021-08-30 23:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/19] list: Support getting most recent element in list_lru Rick Edgecombe
2021-08-30 23:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/19] list: Support list head not in object for list_lru Rick Edgecombe
2021-08-30 23:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/19] x86/mm/cpa: Add grouped page allocations Rick Edgecombe
2021-08-30 23:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/19] mm: Explicitly zero page table lock ptr Rick Edgecombe
2021-08-30 23:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/19] x86, mm: Use cache of page tables Rick Edgecombe
2021-08-31  8:40   ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2021-08-31 19:09     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2021-08-30 23:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/19] x86/mm/cpa: Add perm callbacks to grouped pages Rick Edgecombe
2021-08-30 23:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/19] x86/cpufeatures: Add feature for pks tables Rick Edgecombe
2021-08-30 23:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/19] x86/mm/cpa: Add get_grouped_page_atomic() Rick Edgecombe
2021-08-30 23:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/19] x86/mm: Support GFP_ATOMIC in alloc_table_node() Rick Edgecombe
2021-08-31  8:32   ` Mike Rapoport
2021-08-30 23:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/19] x86/mm: Use alloc_table() for fill_pte(), etc Rick Edgecombe
2021-08-31  8:47   ` Mike Rapoport
2021-08-31 18:48     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2021-08-30 23:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/19] mm/sparsemem: Use alloc_table() for table allocations Rick Edgecombe
2021-08-31  8:55   ` Mike Rapoport
2021-08-31 18:25     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2021-09-01  7:22       ` Mike Rapoport
2021-09-02 13:56         ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-08-30 23:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/19] x86/mm: Use free_table in unmap path Rick Edgecombe
2021-08-30 23:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/19] mm/debug_vm_page_table: Use setters instead of WRITE_ONCE Rick Edgecombe
2021-08-30 23:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 14/19] x86/efi: Toggle table protections when copying Rick Edgecombe
2021-08-30 23:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 15/19] x86/mm/cpa: Add set_memory_pks() Rick Edgecombe
2021-08-30 23:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 16/19] x86/mm: Protect page tables with PKS Rick Edgecombe
2021-08-31  8:56   ` Mike Rapoport
2021-08-31 17:55     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2021-08-30 23:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 17/19] x86/mm/cpa: PKS protect direct map page tables Rick Edgecombe
2021-08-31 10:14   ` Mike Rapoport
2021-08-31 17:58     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2021-08-30 23:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 18/19] x86/mm: Add PKS table soft mode Rick Edgecombe
2021-08-31  3:49   ` Randy Dunlap
2021-08-31 17:55     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2021-08-30 23:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 19/19] x86/mm: Add PKS table debug checking Rick Edgecombe
2024-03-14 16:27 ` [RFC PATCH v2 00/19] PKS write protected page tables Kees Cook
2024-03-14 17:10   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-03-14 18:25     ` Ira Weiny
2024-03-16  3:14 ` Boris Lukashev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YS3q4Q+ybxweHoLK@kernel.org \
    --to=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
    --cc=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).