linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
To: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/23] kcsan: Avoid checking scoped accesses from nested contexts
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 16:47:27 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YaSTn3JbkHsiV5Tm@boqun-archlinux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211118081027.3175699-4-elver@google.com>

Hi Marco,

On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 09:10:07AM +0100, Marco Elver wrote:
> Avoid checking scoped accesses from nested contexts (such as nested
> interrupts or in scheduler code) which share the same kcsan_ctx.
> 
> This is to avoid detecting false positive races of accesses in the same

Could you provide an example for a false positive?

I think we do want to detect the following race:

	static int v = SOME_VALUE; // a percpu variable.
	static int other_v = ... ;

	void foo(..)
	{
		int tmp;
		int other_tmp;

		preempt_disable();
		{
			ASSERT_EXCLUSIVE_ACCESSS_SCOPED(v);
			tmp = v;
			
			other_tmp = other_v; // int_handler() may run here
			
			v = tmp + 2;
		}
		preempt_enabled();
	}

	void int_handler() // an interrupt handler
	{
		v++;
	}

, if I understand correctly, we can detect this currently, but with this
patch, we cannot detect this if the interrupt happens while we're doing
the check for "other_tmp = other_v;", right? Of course, running tests
multiple times may eventually catch this, but I just want to understand
what's this patch for, thanks!

Regards,
Boqun

> thread with currently scoped accesses: consider setting up a watchpoint
> for a non-scoped (normal) access that also "conflicts" with a current
> scoped access. In a nested interrupt (or in the scheduler), which shares
> the same kcsan_ctx, we cannot check scoped accesses set up in the parent
> context -- simply ignore them in this case.
> 
> With the introduction of kcsan_ctx::disable_scoped, we can also clean up
> kcsan_check_scoped_accesses()'s recursion guard, and do not need to
> modify the list's prev pointer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/kcsan.h |  1 +
>  kernel/kcsan/core.c   | 18 +++++++++++++++---
>  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/kcsan.h b/include/linux/kcsan.h
> index fc266ecb2a4d..13cef3458fed 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kcsan.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kcsan.h
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
>   */
>  struct kcsan_ctx {
>  	int disable_count; /* disable counter */
> +	int disable_scoped; /* disable scoped access counter */
>  	int atomic_next; /* number of following atomic ops */
>  
>  	/*
> diff --git a/kernel/kcsan/core.c b/kernel/kcsan/core.c
> index e34a1710b7bc..bd359f8ee63a 100644
> --- a/kernel/kcsan/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/kcsan/core.c
> @@ -204,15 +204,17 @@ check_access(const volatile void *ptr, size_t size, int type, unsigned long ip);
>  static noinline void kcsan_check_scoped_accesses(void)
>  {
>  	struct kcsan_ctx *ctx = get_ctx();
> -	struct list_head *prev_save = ctx->scoped_accesses.prev;
>  	struct kcsan_scoped_access *scoped_access;
>  
> -	ctx->scoped_accesses.prev = NULL;  /* Avoid recursion. */
> +	if (ctx->disable_scoped)
> +		return;
> +
> +	ctx->disable_scoped++;
>  	list_for_each_entry(scoped_access, &ctx->scoped_accesses, list) {
>  		check_access(scoped_access->ptr, scoped_access->size,
>  			     scoped_access->type, scoped_access->ip);
>  	}
> -	ctx->scoped_accesses.prev = prev_save;
> +	ctx->disable_scoped--;
>  }
>  
>  /* Rules for generic atomic accesses. Called from fast-path. */
> @@ -465,6 +467,15 @@ kcsan_setup_watchpoint(const volatile void *ptr, size_t size, int type, unsigned
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Avoid races of scoped accesses from nested interrupts (or scheduler).
> +	 * Assume setting up a watchpoint for a non-scoped (normal) access that
> +	 * also conflicts with a current scoped access. In a nested interrupt,
> +	 * which shares the context, it would check a conflicting scoped access.
> +	 * To avoid, disable scoped access checking.
> +	 */
> +	ctx->disable_scoped++;
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * Save and restore the IRQ state trace touched by KCSAN, since KCSAN's
>  	 * runtime is entered for every memory access, and potentially useful
> @@ -578,6 +589,7 @@ kcsan_setup_watchpoint(const volatile void *ptr, size_t size, int type, unsigned
>  	if (!kcsan_interrupt_watcher)
>  		local_irq_restore(irq_flags);
>  	kcsan_restore_irqtrace(current);
> +	ctx->disable_scoped--;
>  out:
>  	user_access_restore(ua_flags);
>  }
> -- 
> 2.34.0.rc2.393.gf8c9666880-goog
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-29  9:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-18  8:10 [PATCH v2 00/23] kcsan: Support detecting a subset of missing memory barriers Marco Elver
2021-11-18  8:10 ` [PATCH v2 01/23] kcsan: Refactor reading of instrumented memory Marco Elver
2021-11-18 11:08   ` Mark Rutland
2021-11-18  8:10 ` [PATCH v2 02/23] kcsan: Remove redundant zero-initialization of globals Marco Elver
2021-11-18 11:09   ` Mark Rutland
2021-11-18  8:10 ` [PATCH v2 03/23] kcsan: Avoid checking scoped accesses from nested contexts Marco Elver
2021-11-29  8:47   ` Boqun Feng [this message]
2021-11-29 10:57     ` Marco Elver
2021-11-29 14:26       ` Boqun Feng
2021-11-29 14:42         ` Marco Elver
2021-11-18  8:10 ` [PATCH v2 04/23] kcsan: Add core support for a subset of weak memory modeling Marco Elver
2021-11-18  8:10 ` [PATCH v2 05/23] kcsan: Add core memory barrier instrumentation functions Marco Elver
2021-11-18  8:10 ` [PATCH v2 06/23] kcsan, kbuild: Add option for barrier instrumentation only Marco Elver
2021-11-18  8:10 ` [PATCH v2 07/23] kcsan: Call scoped accesses reordered in reports Marco Elver
2021-11-18  8:10 ` [PATCH v2 08/23] kcsan: Show location access was reordered to Marco Elver
2021-11-18  8:10 ` [PATCH v2 09/23] kcsan: Document modeling of weak memory Marco Elver
2021-11-18  8:10 ` [PATCH v2 10/23] kcsan: test: Match reordered or normal accesses Marco Elver
2021-11-18  8:10 ` [PATCH v2 11/23] kcsan: test: Add test cases for memory barrier instrumentation Marco Elver
2021-11-18  8:10 ` [PATCH v2 12/23] kcsan: Ignore GCC 11+ warnings about TSan runtime support Marco Elver
2021-11-18  8:10 ` [PATCH v2 13/23] kcsan: selftest: Add test case to check memory barrier instrumentation Marco Elver
2021-11-18  8:10 ` [PATCH v2 14/23] locking/barriers, kcsan: Add instrumentation for barriers Marco Elver
2021-11-18  8:10 ` [PATCH v2 15/23] locking/barriers, kcsan: Support generic instrumentation Marco Elver
2021-11-18  8:10 ` [PATCH v2 16/23] locking/atomics, kcsan: Add instrumentation for barriers Marco Elver
2021-11-18  8:10 ` [PATCH v2 17/23] asm-generic/bitops, " Marco Elver
2021-11-18  8:10 ` [PATCH v2 18/23] x86/barriers, kcsan: Use generic instrumentation for non-smp barriers Marco Elver
2021-11-18  8:10 ` [PATCH v2 19/23] x86/qspinlock, kcsan: Instrument barrier of pv_queued_spin_unlock() Marco Elver
2021-11-18  8:10 ` [PATCH v2 20/23] mm, kcsan: Enable barrier instrumentation Marco Elver
2021-11-18  8:10 ` [PATCH v2 21/23] sched, kcsan: Enable memory " Marco Elver
2021-11-18  8:10 ` [PATCH v2 22/23] objtool, kcsan: Add memory barrier instrumentation to whitelist Marco Elver
2021-11-18  8:10 ` [PATCH v2 23/23] objtool, kcsan: Remove memory barrier instrumentation from noinstr Marco Elver
2021-11-19 20:31   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-11-19 21:31     ` Marco Elver
2021-11-23 11:29     ` Marco Elver
2021-11-24 17:53       ` Josh Poimboeuf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YaSTn3JbkHsiV5Tm@boqun-archlinux \
    --to=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).