linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
	Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>,
	Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@bootlin.com>,
	linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, kernel-team@android.com,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] driver core: Extend deferred probe timeout on driver registration
Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 08:17:14 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Youleo3Ganxbc1sq@dev-arch.thelio-3990X> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGETcx-JyWwoGA3o8eep7E29Cm4DcVT6D1JFJh72jLcqm_mjCQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 05:15:55PM -0700, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 5:04 PM Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 04:49:48PM -0700, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 4:30 PM Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Saravana,
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 03:09:32PM -0700, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> > > > > The deferred probe timer that's used for this currently starts at
> > > > > late_initcall and runs for driver_deferred_probe_timeout seconds. The
> > > > > assumption being that all available drivers would be loaded and
> > > > > registered before the timer expires. This means, the
> > > > > driver_deferred_probe_timeout has to be pretty large for it to cover the
> > > > > worst case. But if we set the default value for it to cover the worst
> > > > > case, it would significantly slow down the average case. For this
> > > > > reason, the default value is set to 0.
> > > > >
> > > > > Also, with CONFIG_MODULES=y and the current default values of
> > > > > driver_deferred_probe_timeout=0 and fw_devlink=on, devices with missing
> > > > > drivers will cause their consumer devices to always defer their probes.
> > > > > This is because device links created by fw_devlink defer the probe even
> > > > > before the consumer driver's probe() is called.
> > > > >
> > > > > Instead of a fixed timeout, if we extend an unexpired deferred probe
> > > > > timer on every successful driver registration, with the expectation more
> > > > > modules would be loaded in the near future, then the default value of
> > > > > driver_deferred_probe_timeout only needs to be as long as the worst case
> > > > > time difference between two consecutive module loads.
> > > > >
> > > > > So let's implement that and set the default value to 10 seconds when
> > > > > CONFIG_MODULES=y.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> > > > > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
> > > > > Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> > > > > Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> > > > > Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> > > > > Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
> > > > > Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>
> > > > > Cc: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> > > > > Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> > > > > Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
> > > > > Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
> > > > > Cc: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>
> > > > > Cc: Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@bootlin.com>
> > > > > Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
> > > > > Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
> > > > > Cc: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
> > > >
> > > > I bisected a boot hang with ARCH=s390 defconfig in QEMU down to this
> > > > change as commit 2b28a1a84a0e ("driver core: Extend deferred probe
> > > > timeout on driver registration") in next-20220520 (bisect log below).
> > > >
> > > > $ make -skj"$(nproc)" ARCH=s390 CROSS_COMPILE=s390x-linux-gnu- defconfig bzImage
> > > >
> > > > $ timeout --foreground 15m stdbuf -oL -eL \
> > > > qemu-system-s390x \
> > > > -initrd ... \
> > > > -M s390-ccw-virtio \
> > > > -display none \
> > > > -kernel arch/s390/boot/bzImage \
> > > > -m 512m \
> > > > -nodefaults \
> > > > -serial mon:stdio
> > > > ...
> > > > [    2.077303] In-situ OAM (IOAM) with IPv6
> > > > [    2.077639] NET: Registered PF_PACKET protocol family
> > > > [    2.078063] bridge: filtering via arp/ip/ip6tables is no longer available by default. Update your scripts to load br_netfilter if you need this.
> > > > [    2.078795] Key type dns_resolver registered
> > > > [    2.079317] cio: Channel measurement facility initialized using format extended (mode autodetected)
> > > > [    2.081494] Discipline DIAG cannot be used without z/VM
> > > > [  260.626363] random: crng init done
> > > > qemu-system-s390x: terminating on signal 15 from pid 3815762 (timeout)
> > > >
> > > > We have a simple rootfs available if necessary:
> > > >
> > > > https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/boot-utils/raw/bc0d17785eb67f1edd0ee0a134970a807895f741/images/s390/rootfs.cpio.zst
> > > >
> > > > If there is any other information I can provide, please let me know!
> > >
> > > Hmm... strange. Can you please try the following command line options
> > > and tell me which of these has the issue and which don't?
> >
> > Sure thing!
> >
> > > 1) deferred_probe_timeout=0
> >
> > No issue.
> >
> > > 2) deferred_probe_timeout=1
> > > 3) deferred_probe_timeout=300
> >
> > Both of these appear to hang in the same way, I let each sit for five
> > minutes.
> 
> Strange that a sufficiently large timeout isn't helping. Is it trying
> to boot off a network mount? I'll continue looking into this next
> week.

I don't think so, it seems like doing that requires some extra flags
that we do not have:

https://wiki.qemu.org/Features/S390xNetworkBoot

If you need any additional information or want something tested, please
let me know!

Cheers,
Nathan

  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-23 15:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-29 22:09 [PATCH v1] driver core: Extend deferred probe timeout on driver registration Saravana Kannan
2022-05-13 12:48 ` Mark Brown
2022-05-13 13:58 ` Rob Herring
2022-05-13 17:25   ` Saravana Kannan
2022-05-16 13:49     ` Rob Herring
2022-05-20 23:30 ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-05-20 23:49   ` Saravana Kannan
2022-05-21  0:04     ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-05-21  0:15       ` Saravana Kannan
2022-05-23 15:17         ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2022-05-23 20:04           ` Saravana Kannan
2022-05-23 22:14             ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-05-24  3:43               ` Saravana Kannan
2022-05-24 16:41                 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-05-24 17:46                   ` Saravana Kannan
2022-05-25  7:11                     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-05-25 19:49                       ` Saravana Kannan
2022-05-29  8:34                         ` Niklas Cassel
2022-05-30  4:59                           ` Saravana Kannan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Youleo3Ganxbc1sq@dev-arch.thelio-3990X \
    --to=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=khilman@kernel.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul.kocialkowski@bootlin.com \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=saravanak@google.com \
    --cc=treding@nvidia.com \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).