From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
idryomov@gmail.com, dhowells@redhat.com, vshankar@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org,
keescook@chromium.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-cachefs@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] netfs: release the folio lock and put the folio before retrying
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2022 03:10:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YsJMCZB/ecQQha+/@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f55d10f8-55f6-f56c-bb41-bce139869c8d@redhat.com>
On Mon, Jul 04, 2022 at 09:13:44AM +0800, Xiubo Li wrote:
> On 7/1/22 6:38 PM, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > I don't know here... I think it might be better to just expect that when
> > this function returns an error that the folio has already been unlocked.
> > Doing it this way will mean that you will lock and unlock the folio a
> > second time for no reason.
> >
> > Maybe something like this instead?
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/netfs/buffered_read.c b/fs/netfs/buffered_read.c
> > index 42f892c5712e..8ae7b0f4c909 100644
> > --- a/fs/netfs/buffered_read.c
> > +++ b/fs/netfs/buffered_read.c
> > @@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ int netfs_write_begin(struct netfs_inode *ctx,
> > trace_netfs_failure(NULL, NULL, ret, netfs_fail_check_write_begin);
> > if (ret == -EAGAIN)
> > goto retry;
> > - goto error;
> > + goto error_unlocked;
> > }
> > }
> > @@ -418,6 +418,7 @@ int netfs_write_begin(struct netfs_inode *ctx,
> > error:
> > folio_unlock(folio);
> > folio_put(folio);
> > +error_unlocked:
> > _leave(" = %d", ret);
> > return ret;
> > }
>
> Then the "afs" won't work correctly:
>
> 377 static int afs_check_write_begin(struct file *file, loff_t pos, unsigned
> len,
> 378 struct folio *folio, void **_fsdata)
> 379 {
> 380 struct afs_vnode *vnode = AFS_FS_I(file_inode(file));
> 381
> 382 return test_bit(AFS_VNODE_DELETED, &vnode->flags) ? -ESTALE : 0;
> 383 }
>
> The "afs" does nothing with the folio lock.
It's OK to fix AFS too.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-04 2:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-01 2:29 [PATCH 0/2] netfs, ceph: fix the crash when unlocking the folio xiubli
2022-07-01 2:29 ` [PATCH 1/2] netfs: release the folio lock and put the folio before retrying xiubli
2022-07-01 10:38 ` Jeff Layton
2022-07-04 1:13 ` Xiubo Li
2022-07-04 2:10 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2022-07-04 2:40 ` Xiubo Li
2022-07-04 6:58 ` Xiubo Li
2022-07-05 13:21 ` David Howells
2022-07-05 13:41 ` Jeff Layton
2022-07-06 0:58 ` Xiubo Li
2022-07-01 2:29 ` [PATCH 2/2] ceph: do not release the folio lock in kceph xiubli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YsJMCZB/ecQQha+/@casper.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-cachefs@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vshankar@redhat.com \
--cc=xiubli@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).