linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lennart Poettering <mzxreary@0pointer.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
	Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@lists.linux.dev>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: API break, sysfs "capability" file
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 18:10:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zh_0bfqBsJFyJKgT@gardel-login> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240417155913.GA6447@lst.de>

On Mi, 17.04.24 17:59, Christoph Hellwig (hch@lst.de) wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 05:48:16PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > Block devices with part scanning off are quite common after all,
> > i.e. "losetup" creates them by default like that, and partition block
> > devices themselves have no part scanning on and so on, hence we have
> > to be ablet to operate sanely with them.
>
> Maybe and ioctl to turn on partition scanning if it is currently disabled
> or return an error otherwise would be the better thing?  It would
> do the right thing for the most common loop case, and with a bit more
> work could do the right thing for those that more or less disable it
> graciously (ubiblock, drbd, zram) and would just fail for those who are
> so grotty old code and slow devices that we never want to do a partition
> scan (basically old floppy drivers and the Nintendo N64 cartridge driver)

Well, there are plenty of other block devices with part scanning off,
such as DM, including dm-crypt, dm-integrity and so on. And that's
certainly stuff we want to cover for this.

Lennart

--
Lennart Poettering, Berlin

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-17 16:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <ZhQJf8mzq_wipkBH@gardel-login>
2024-04-08 17:43 ` API break, sysfs "capability" file Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2024-04-08 18:41   ` Keith Busch
2024-04-08 20:23     ` Lennart Poettering
2024-04-08 22:41       ` Keith Busch
2024-04-09  6:09         ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-04-09  8:19         ` Lennart Poettering
2024-04-09 14:15           ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-09 15:17             ` Jens Axboe
2024-04-16  9:26               ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2024-04-17 15:07                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-16 14:18               ` Lennart Poettering
2024-04-16 14:22                 ` Jens Axboe
2024-04-16 14:25                   ` Lennart Poettering
2024-04-16 14:33                     ` Jens Axboe
2024-04-24  8:09                       ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2024-04-25 13:08                         ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-16 14:23             ` Lennart Poettering
2024-04-16 14:44               ` Keith Busch
2024-04-17 15:13                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-17 15:48                   ` Lennart Poettering
2024-04-17 15:59                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-17 16:10                       ` Lennart Poettering [this message]
2024-04-17 16:22                         ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-17 16:26                           ` Lennart Poettering
2024-04-17 16:38                             ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-18  6:28                       ` Hannes Reinecke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zh_0bfqBsJFyJKgT@gardel-login \
    --to=mzxreary@0pointer.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).