From: Lennart Poettering <mzxreary@0pointer.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@lists.linux.dev>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: API break, sysfs "capability" file
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 18:26:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zh_4UbT0m12EAFc3@gardel-login> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240417162257.GA8098@lst.de>
eOn Mi, 17.04.24 18:22, Christoph Hellwig (hch@lst.de) wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 06:10:21PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > Well, there are plenty of other block devices with part scanning off,
> > such as DM, including dm-crypt, dm-integrity and so on. And that's
> > certainly stuff we want to cover for this.
>
> But there is no good reason to prohibit scanning for them. We can't
> scan by default as that would probably break a few expectations in
> userspace, but we can trivially allow manual scanning.
Hmm, so you want to generically allow toggling the flag from
userspace? I mean that'd be fine with me, but it would feel a bit
weird if you let's say have a partition block device, where you'd
toggle this, and then you have two levels of part scanning, and then
you toggle it on one of the part block devices there and so on, and so
on. Could that work at all with the major/minor allocation stuff?
But let's say you add such a user-controlled thing, if you'd add that
I figure you really also need a way to query the current state, right?
which is basically what I originally was looking for...
i.e. it would be really weird if we could set the flag, but not query
it in the first place.
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering, Berlin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-17 16:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <ZhQJf8mzq_wipkBH@gardel-login>
2024-04-08 17:43 ` API break, sysfs "capability" file Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2024-04-08 18:41 ` Keith Busch
2024-04-08 20:23 ` Lennart Poettering
2024-04-08 22:41 ` Keith Busch
2024-04-09 6:09 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-04-09 8:19 ` Lennart Poettering
2024-04-09 14:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-09 15:17 ` Jens Axboe
2024-04-16 9:26 ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2024-04-17 15:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-16 14:18 ` Lennart Poettering
2024-04-16 14:22 ` Jens Axboe
2024-04-16 14:25 ` Lennart Poettering
2024-04-16 14:33 ` Jens Axboe
2024-04-24 8:09 ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2024-04-25 13:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-16 14:23 ` Lennart Poettering
2024-04-16 14:44 ` Keith Busch
2024-04-17 15:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-17 15:48 ` Lennart Poettering
2024-04-17 15:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-17 16:10 ` Lennart Poettering
2024-04-17 16:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-17 16:26 ` Lennart Poettering [this message]
2024-04-17 16:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-18 6:28 ` Hannes Reinecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zh_4UbT0m12EAFc3@gardel-login \
--to=mzxreary@0pointer.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).