linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Eric Sesterhenn <eric.sesterhenn@lsexperts.de>
Cc: Conrad Kostecki <ck@conrad-kostecki.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: [PATCH] x86: HPET force enable for Soekris net6501
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 16:54:39 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1409091649510.11037@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <540F06F1.1040608@lsexperts.de>

On Tue, 9 Sep 2014, Eric Sesterhenn wrote:
> On 02/14/2014 07:28 PM, Conrad Kostecki wrote:
> This patch enables a quirk for the Soekris net6501 HPET if
> pciquirks=soekris_e6xx" is supplied at the kernel commandline,
> Without these patches the clocksource defaults to jiffies, which
> is unstable.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sesterhenn <eric.sesterhenn@lsexperts.de>
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/quirks.c b/arch/x86/kernel/quirks.c
> index ff898bb..7c3faf5 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/quirks.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/quirks.c
> @@ -6,6 +6,25 @@
> 
>  #include <asm/hpet.h>
> 
> +static int pciquirk_soekris;
> +
> +static int __init parse_pciquirks(char *str)
> +{
> +
> +	while (str) {
> +		char *next = strchr(str, ',');
> +
> +		if (next)
> +			*next++ = 0;
> +		if (!strncmp("soekris_e6xx", str, 12))
> +			pciquirk_soekris = 1;
> +		str = next;
> +	}
> +        return 1;
> +}
> +__setup("pciquirks=", parse_pciquirks);

Eew. No, we really can do without random new quirk interfaces.

>  #if defined(CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC) && defined(CONFIG_SMP) && defined(CONFIG_PCI)
> 
>  static void quirk_intel_irqbalance(struct pci_dev *dev)
> @@ -498,6 +517,28 @@ void force_hpet_resume(void)
>  }
> 
>  /*
> + * Soekris net6501, based on Atom E6xx series, does not have ACPI.
> + * HPET should be force enabled on such platforms.
> + */
> +static void e6xx_force_enable_hpet(struct pci_dev *dev)
> +{
> +	if (hpet_address || force_hpet_address)
> +		return;
> +
> +	if (pciquirk_soekris != 1)
> +		return;

Thinking more about it, this is really not necessary.

@hpa: You asked whether this might affect any other e6xx devices.

According to the atom e6xx-series datasheet the HPET is non optional
and always memory mapped to 0xfed00000. I don't see how that would
harm any machine which has the hpet proper advertised via ACPI.

Thanks,

	tglx

> +
> +	force_hpet_address = 0xFED00000;
> +	force_hpet_resume_type = NONE_FORCE_HPET_RESUME;
> +	dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG, &dev->dev, "Force enabled HPET at "
> +		"0x%lx\n", force_hpet_address);
> +	return;
> +}
> +
> +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_E6XX_CU,
> +			 e6xx_force_enable_hpet);

  reply	other threads:[~2014-09-09 14:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-14 10:23 [PATCH] x86: HPET force enable for Soekris net6501 Conrad Kostecki
2014-02-14 17:46 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-14 18:06   ` AW: " Conrad Kostecki
2014-02-14 18:08     ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-14 18:13       ` AW: " Conrad Kostecki
2014-02-14 18:16         ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-14 18:21           ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-02-14 18:22             ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-14 18:38               ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-02-14 18:39                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-14 19:15                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-02-14 19:26                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-14 19:59                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-02-14 20:06                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-14 21:16                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-02-14 21:18                             ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-14 21:47                               ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-02-14 21:48                                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-17 16:28                             ` Thomas Renninger
2014-02-17 17:19                               ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-17 18:23                                 ` Thomas Renninger
2014-02-17 18:47                                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-17 19:25                                     ` Thomas Renninger
2014-02-17 19:40                                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-18 18:22                                         ` ACPI: Also allow ACPI table adding via initrd not only overriding Thomas Renninger
2014-02-18 18:22                                           ` [PATCH 1/4] ACPI: Provide support for ACPI table adding via OS Thomas Renninger
2014-02-18 18:27                                             ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-18 18:44                                               ` Thomas Renninger
2014-02-18 20:51                                                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-19 11:22                                                   ` Thomas Renninger
2014-02-21  7:24                                                     ` [Devel] " Zheng, Lv
2014-02-21  7:28                                                 ` Zheng, Lv
2014-02-18 18:22                                           ` [PATCH 2/4] ACPICA: Introduce new acpi_os_physical_table_add OS callback Thomas Renninger
2014-02-18 18:22                                           ` [PATCH 3/4] ACPICA: Add BGRT signature to known signatures Thomas Renninger
2014-02-18 18:22                                           ` [PATCH 4/4] ACPI: Add new table signatures that can be overridden/added Thomas Renninger
2014-02-18 18:38                                           ` [Devel] ACPI: Also allow ACPI table adding via initrd not only overriding Moore, Robert
2014-02-18 18:52                                             ` Thomas Renninger
2014-02-18 19:59                                               ` Moore, Robert
2014-02-19 11:14                                                 ` Thomas Renninger
2014-02-19 13:03                                                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-02-14 18:28           ` AW: AW: AW: [PATCH] x86: HPET force enable for Soekris net6501 Conrad Kostecki
2014-09-09 13:56             ` Eric Sesterhenn
2014-09-09 14:54               ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2014-09-09 15:26                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-09-09 15:41                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-09-12  9:41                   ` Eric Sesterhenn
2014-09-12 10:37                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-09-12 11:06                       ` [PATCH] x86: HPET force enable for e6xx based systems Eric Sesterhenn
2014-09-16  0:58                         ` [tip:x86/platform] " tip-bot for Peter Neubauer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.10.1409091649510.11037@nanos \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=ck@conrad-kostecki.de \
    --cc=eric.sesterhenn@lsexperts.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).