From: Scot Doyle <lkml14@scotdoyle.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>,
Dann Frazier <dann.frazier@canonical.com>,
Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org>,
Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>,
Jonathan Liu <net147@gmail.com>,
Alistair Popple <alistair@popple.id.au>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com>,
"Chintakuntla, Radha" <Radha.Chintakuntla@caviumnetworks.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.com>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fbcon: use default if cursor blink interval is not valid
Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 09:22:27 -0500 (CDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1605190903170.13857@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160519090139.GA1539@amd>
On Thu, 19 May 2016, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > Two current [1] and three previous [2] systems locked during boot
> > because the cursor flash timer was set using an ops->cur_blink_jiffies
> > value of 0. Previous patches attempted to solve the problem by moving
> > variable initialization earlier in the setup sequence [2].
> >
> > Use the normal cursor blink default interval of 200 ms if
> > ops->cur_blink_jiffies is not in the range specified in commit
> > bd63364caa8d. Since invalid values are not used, specific system
> > initialization timings should not cause lockups.
> >
> > [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1574814
> > [2] see commits: 2a17d7e80f1d, f235f664a8af, a1e533ec07d5
>
> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
>
> > static void cursor_timer_handler(unsigned long dev_addr)
> > {
> > struct fb_info *info = (struct fb_info *) dev_addr;
> > struct fbcon_ops *ops = info->fbcon_par;
> >
> > queue_work(system_power_efficient_wq, &info->queue);
> > - mod_timer(&ops->cursor_timer, jiffies + ops->cur_blink_jiffies);
> > + mod_timer(&ops->cursor_timer, jiffies +
> > + cursor_blink_jiffies(ops->cur_blink_jiffies));
> > }
> >
> > static void fbcon_add_cursor_timer(struct fb_info *info)
>
> And actually... perhaps mod_timer should have some check for too low
> timeouts..?
>
> WARN_ON?
> Pavel
Interesting idea. I applied this patch to a couple systems and
receive the same warning on both:
diff --git a/kernel/time/timer.c b/kernel/time/timer.c
index 73164c3..f6c0b69 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timer.c
@@ -788,6 +788,7 @@ __mod_timer(struct timer_list *timer, unsigned long expires,
timer_stats_timer_set_start_info(timer);
BUG_ON(!timer->function);
+ WARN_ONCE(expires == jiffies, "timer should expire in the future");
base = lock_timer_base(timer, &flags);
------
[ 2.060474] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 2.061613] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 164 at kernel/time/timer.c:791 mod_timer+0x233/0x240
[ 2.062740] timer should expire in the future
[ 2.062757] CPU: 0 PID: 164 Comm: kworker/0:2 Not tainted 4.6.0+ #7
[ 2.065870] Hardware name: Toshiba Leon, BIOS 12/04/2013
[ 2.067828] Workqueue: events_power_efficient hub_init_func3
[ 2.069762] 0000000000000000 ffff88007443bbb8 ffffffff8139932b ffff88007443bc08
[ 2.071701] 0000000000000000 ffff88007443bbf8 ffffffff8112e57c 0000031700000000
[ 2.073655] ffff88007486a0b0 00000000fffea2da ffff88007486a000 0000000000000202
[ 2.075594] Call Trace:
[ 2.077503] [<ffffffff8139932b>] dump_stack+0x4d/0x72
[ 2.079426] [<ffffffff8112e57c>] __warn+0xcc/0xf0
[ 2.081325] [<ffffffff8112e5ef>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x4f/0x60
[ 2.083212] [<ffffffff813ad5e5>] ? find_next_bit+0x15/0x20
[ 2.085022] [<ffffffff8139914f>] ? cpumask_next_and+0x2f/0x40
[ 2.086696] [<ffffffff81188a93>] mod_timer+0x233/0x240
[ 2.088362] [<ffffffff815fff02>] usb_hcd_submit_urb+0x3f2/0x8c0
[ 2.090026] [<ffffffff81601dc4>] ? urb_destroy+0x24/0x30
[ 2.091698] [<ffffffff81142ba8>] ? insert_work+0x58/0xb0
[ 2.093349] [<ffffffff81602297>] usb_submit_urb+0x287/0x530
[ 2.094985] [<ffffffff815f986d>] hub_activate+0x1fd/0x5d0
[ 2.096625] [<ffffffff81150188>] ? finish_task_switch+0x78/0x1f0
[ 2.098268] [<ffffffff815f9cca>] hub_init_func3+0x1a/0x20
[ 2.099908] [<ffffffff811438e0>] process_one_work+0x140/0x3e0
[ 2.101539] [<ffffffff81143bce>] worker_thread+0x4e/0x480
[ 2.103173] [<ffffffff81143b80>] ? process_one_work+0x3e0/0x3e0
[ 2.104790] [<ffffffff81143b80>] ? process_one_work+0x3e0/0x3e0
[ 2.106259] [<ffffffff81149829>] kthread+0xc9/0xe0
[ 2.107731] [<ffffffff81856152>] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x40
[ 2.109215] [<ffffffff81149760>] ? __kthread_parkme+0x70/0x70
[ 2.110704] ---[ end trace 3519886a1a990d99 ]---
mod_timer is called from over a thousand places. Should timers always
expire in the future?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-19 14:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-17 18:41 [PATCH] tty: vt: Fix soft lockup in fbcon cursor blink timer David Daney
2016-05-17 20:49 ` Pavel Machek
2016-05-18 0:42 ` Ming Lei
2016-05-18 20:24 ` Scot Doyle
2016-05-18 20:38 ` David Daney
2016-05-19 4:21 ` [PATCH] fbcon: use default if cursor blink interval is not valid Scot Doyle
2016-05-19 7:25 ` Jeremy Kerr
2016-05-19 8:29 ` Ming Lei
2016-05-19 9:01 ` Pavel Machek
2016-05-19 14:22 ` Scot Doyle [this message]
2016-05-19 15:31 ` Ming Lei
2016-05-19 15:59 ` David Daney
2016-05-19 22:25 ` Scot Doyle
2016-05-19 22:31 ` [PATCH] fbcon: warn on invalid cursor blink intervals Scot Doyle
2016-05-19 22:50 ` David Daney
2016-05-20 1:21 ` Jeremy Kerr
2016-05-20 2:17 ` Ming Lei
2016-05-20 2:26 ` Jeremy Kerr
2016-05-20 2:48 ` Ming Lei
2016-05-20 5:04 ` Jeremy Kerr
2016-05-20 16:27 ` Scot Doyle
2016-05-24 1:19 ` Scot Doyle
2016-05-28 11:48 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2016-06-12 5:05 ` Chintakuntla, Radha
2016-05-28 11:45 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2016-05-19 0:27 ` [PATCH] tty: vt: Fix soft lockup in fbcon cursor blink timer Ming Lei
2016-05-19 7:08 ` Pavel Machek
2016-05-19 22:35 ` Scot Doyle
2016-05-28 11:44 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2016-06-14 16:22 ` Ping: " David Daney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.10.1605190903170.13857@laptop \
--to=lkml14@scotdoyle.com \
--cc=Radha.Chintakuntla@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=alistair@popple.id.au \
--cc=dann.frazier@canonical.com \
--cc=david.daney@cavium.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com \
--cc=jk@ozlabs.org \
--cc=jslaby@suse.com \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \
--cc=net147@gmail.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
--cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
--cc=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).