linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shivappa Vikas <vikas.shivappa@intel.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com>,
	vikas.shivappa@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@kernel.org,
	peterz@infradead.org, ravi.v.shankar@intel.com,
	tony.luck@intel.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com,
	h.peter.anvin@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] x86/intel_rdt/mba: Add info directory files for MBA
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 17:02:12 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1701171657320.15892@vshiva-Udesk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1701161508520.3877@nanos>



On Mon, 16 Jan 2017, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

> On Tue, 10 Jan 2017, Vikas Shivappa wrote:
>
>> Add the files in info directory for MBA.
>> The files in the info directory are as follows :
>>  - num_closids: max number of closids for MBA which represents the max
>>  class of service user can configure.
>>  - max_thrtl_by: the max throttle by values.
>>
>> Throttle by can have a linear scale and non linear scale.  In linear
>> scale, if a throttle_by value is 40%, it means that the memory b/w is
>> throttled 'by' 40% or in other words a max of 60% b/w is allowed to
>> pass. In non-linear scale, the throttle_by values are in 2^n
>> granularity. The h/w does not guarantee a curve of actual throttle w.r.t
>> the configured values. But if a throttle_by value of x > y, then x is
>> guaranteed to throttle more b/w than y.
>
> This is ambigous because that is only correct when the effective values are
> different. x=11 and y=12 with a granularity of 10 are resulting in the same
> throttling.

The x and y are actual values written which i will spell out. The assumption is 
that only correct values are input though because we filterout the values which 
dont follow granularity, meaning return -EINVAL 
when someone tries to write 11 when granularity is 10. This was with the idea 
thats its easier for the user to understand whats actually written. Woudl that 
be reasonable or does it need a change ?
(Although the h/w does like you say , we can do a msr write for 11 etc ..)

>
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/intel_rdt.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/intel_rdt.h
>> @@ -5,7 +5,6 @@
>>
>>  #include <linux/kernfs.h>
>>  #include <linux/jump_label.h>
>> -
>>  #include <asm/intel_rdt_common.h>
>
> This white space is there on purpose to seperate linux and asm prefixed
> includes. Stop making random white space changes.
>
>> @@ -77,6 +76,8 @@ struct rftype {
>>   * @no_ctrl:			Specifies max cache cbm or min mem b/w delay.
>>   * @min_cbm_bits:		Minimum number of consecutive bits to be set
>>   *				in a cache bit mask
>> + * @info_files:		resctrl info files for the resource
>> + * @infofiles_len:		Number of info files
>
> This wants to be a seperate patch as it changes the way how the info files
> are set up. The implementation for the MBA stuff is a follow up patch.

Ok , will split

>
>>   * @max_delay:		Max throttle delay
>>   * @delay_gran:		Throttle delay granularity
>>   * @delay_linear:		true if delay is in linear scale
>> @@ -98,6 +99,8 @@ struct rdt_resource {
>>  	int			cbm_len;
>>  	int			min_cbm_bits;
>>  	u32			no_ctrl;
>> +	struct rftype		*info_files;
>> +	int			infofiles_len;
>>  	u32			max_delay;
>>  	u32			delay_gran;
>>  	u32			delay_linear;
>> @@ -137,6 +140,9 @@ struct msr_param {
>>  	int			high;
>>  };
>>
>> +void rdt_get_cache_infofile(struct rdt_resource *r);
>> +void rdt_get_mbe_infofile(struct rdt_resource *r);
>> +
>>  extern struct mutex rdtgroup_mutex;
>>
>>  extern struct rdt_resource rdt_resources_all[];
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt.c
>> index 6736e1d..bdfbd1d 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt.c
>> @@ -154,6 +154,7 @@ static void rdt_get_mem_config(struct rdt_resource *r)
>>  	if (r->delay_linear)
>>  		r->delay_gran = MAX_MBA_THRTL - r->max_delay;
>>
>> +	rdt_get_mbe_infofile(r);
>>  	r->capable = true;
>>  	r->enabled = true;
>>  }
>> @@ -168,6 +169,7 @@ static void rdt_get_cache_config(int idx, struct rdt_resource *r)
>>  	r->num_closid = edx.split.cos_max + 1;
>>  	r->cbm_len = eax.split.cbm_len + 1;
>>  	r->no_ctrl = BIT_MASK(eax.split.cbm_len + 1) - 1;
>> +	rdt_get_cache_infofile(r);
>>  	r->capable = true;
>>  	r->enabled = true;
>>  }
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_rdtgroup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_rdtgroup.c
>> index 53f1917..9d9b7f4 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_rdtgroup.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_rdtgroup.c
>> @@ -517,9 +517,41 @@ static int rdt_min_cbm_bits_show(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
>>
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>> +static int rdt_max_delay_show(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
>> +			     struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
>> +{
>> +	struct rdt_resource *r = of->kn->parent->priv;
>> +
>> +	seq_printf(seq, "%d\n", r->max_delay);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int rdt_delay_gran_show(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
>> +			     struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
>> +{
>> +	struct rdt_resource *r = of->kn->parent->priv;
>> +
>> +	if (r->delay_linear)
>> +		seq_printf(seq, "%d\n", r->delay_gran);
>> +	else
>> +		seq_printf(seq, "power of 2\n");
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int rdt_delay_linear_show(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
>> +			     struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
>> +{
>> +	struct rdt_resource *r = of->kn->parent->priv;
>> +
>> +	seq_printf(seq, "%d\n", r->delay_linear);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>>
>>  /* rdtgroup information files for one cache resource. */
>> -static struct rftype res_info_files[] = {
>> +static struct rftype res_cache_info_files[] = {
>>  	{
>>  		.name		= "num_closids",
>>  		.mode		= 0444,
>> @@ -540,11 +572,52 @@ static int rdt_min_cbm_bits_show(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
>>  	},
>>  };
>>
>> +/* rdtgroup information files for MBE. */
>> +static struct rftype res_mbe_info_files[] = {
>> +	{
>> +		.name		= "num_closids",
>> +		.mode		= 0444,
>> +		.kf_ops		= &rdtgroup_kf_single_ops,
>> +		.seq_show	= rdt_num_closids_show,
>> +	},
>> +	{
>> +		.name		= "max_thrtl_by",
>
> You surely could not come up with a more cryptic file name, right? What's
> so wrong with spelling out throttle? And the whole '_by' postfix here and
> on the other files is pointless as well.

This is due to the issue i mention in reply to 1/8.. Can be changed to something 
better though. bw_restrict / bw_block (block is stopping..) ?

Thanks,
Vikas

>
> Thanks,
>
> 	tglx
>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-18  1:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-10 19:33 [PATCH 0/8 V1] x86/intel_rdt: Memory b/w Allocation support Vikas Shivappa
2017-01-10 19:33 ` [PATCH 1/8] Documentation, x86: Documentation for Intel Mem b/w allocation user interface Vikas Shivappa
2017-01-16 13:43   ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-01-18  0:51     ` Shivappa Vikas
2017-01-18  9:01       ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-01-23 18:57         ` Shivappa Vikas
2017-01-23 19:01           ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-01-24 22:10             ` Shivappa Vikas
2017-01-10 19:33 ` [PATCH 2/8] x86/intel_rdt/mba: Generalize the naming to get ready for MBA Vikas Shivappa
2017-01-16 13:45   ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-01-10 19:33 ` [PATCH 3/8] x86/intel_rdt/mba: Improvements to handle more RDT resources like MBA Vikas Shivappa
2017-01-16 13:54   ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-01-18  0:53     ` Shivappa Vikas
2017-01-18  9:05       ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-01-10 19:33 ` [PATCH 4/8] x86/intel_rdt/mba: Memory b/w allocation feature detect Vikas Shivappa
2017-01-16 13:59   ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-01-16 14:41     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-01-16 16:16       ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-01-10 19:33 ` [PATCH 5/8] x86/intel_rct/mba: Add MBA structures and initialize MBA Vikas Shivappa
2017-01-16 14:06   ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-01-18  0:56     ` Shivappa Vikas
2017-01-10 19:33 ` [PATCH 6/8] x86/intel_rdt/mba: Add info directory files for MBA Vikas Shivappa
2017-01-16 14:14   ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-01-18  1:02     ` Shivappa Vikas [this message]
2017-01-18  9:08       ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-01-23 19:45         ` Shivappa Vikas
2017-01-10 19:33 ` [PATCH 7/8] x86/intel_rdt/mba: Add schemata file support " Vikas Shivappa
2017-01-16 16:07   ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-01-18  1:03     ` Shivappa Vikas
2017-01-10 19:33 ` [PATCH 8/8] x86/intel_rdt: rmdir,umount and hotcpu updates " Vikas Shivappa
2017-01-16 16:13   ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-01-23 20:18     ` Shivappa Vikas
2017-02-17 19:58 [PATCH 0/8 V2] x86/intel_rdt: Intel Memory bandwidth allocation Vikas Shivappa
2017-02-17 19:58 ` [PATCH 6/8] x86/intel_rdt/mba: Add info directory files for MBA Vikas Shivappa
2017-03-01 16:05   ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-03-10 23:26     ` Shivappa Vikas
2017-04-03 21:57 [PATCH 0/8 V3] x86/intel_rdt: Intel Memory bandwidth allocation Vikas Shivappa
2017-04-03 21:57 ` [PATCH 6/8] x86/intel_rdt/mba: Add info directory files for MBA Vikas Shivappa
2017-04-08  0:33 [PATCH 0/8 V4] x86/intel_rdt: Intel Memory bandwidth allocation Vikas Shivappa
2017-04-08  0:33 ` [PATCH 6/8] x86/intel_rdt/mba: Add info directory files for MBA Vikas Shivappa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.10.1701171657320.15892@vshiva-Udesk \
    --to=vikas.shivappa@intel.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=h.peter.anvin@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).