From: Christopher Lameter <cl@linux.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: cmetcalf@mellanox.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, hpa@zytor.com,
riel@redhat.com, mingo@kernel.org, efault@gmx.de,
frederic@kernel.org, kernellwp@gmail.com,
paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, lcapitulino@redhat.com,
linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:sched/core] sched/isolation: Document the isolcpus= flags
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 11:30:59 -0500 (CDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1710301125060.1182@nuc-kabylake> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171030161101.wprohopz5eg7snb4@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Mon, 30 Oct 2017, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > isolcpus is the *right* approach here because you are micromanaging the OS
> > and are putting dedicated pieces of software on each core.
>
> That is what you want, and cpusets should allow for that just fine.
Well yes a cpuset of one processor I guess.
> > A cgroup suggests that threads would be scheduled over multiple cores
> > which is *not* what you want.
>
> No, that suggestion is false. cpusets should allow you to isolate
> individual CPUs just fine.
>
> > cgroup has to do something with containers
>
> Sod containers. That's just modern group think. cpusets existed long
> before all that wankery and it should very well retain the original use
> cases.
Historically cpusets were not used for cpu isolation. They were used to
restrict applications threads to sets of cpus for performance reasons. And
we are here dealing with individual processors.
> That said, I know there's problems with cpusets, and those should be
> fixed. But that doesn't mean isolcpus is anything other than a vile
> hack.
Controlling the way an individual processor works would be best done with
some kind of configuration in sysfs. I.e. /sys/cpu/<xx>/no_sched or so.
In lieu of that I think isolcpus is definitely better than a cpuset and it
is the only way that traditionally processor handling of the OS has been
restricted.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-30 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-27 2:42 [GIT PULL] Housekeeping subsystem v6 Frederic Weisbecker
2017-10-27 2:42 ` [PATCH 01/12] housekeeping: Move housekeeping related code to its own file Frederic Weisbecker
2017-10-27 12:01 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/isolation: " tip-bot for Frederic Weisbecker
2017-10-27 2:42 ` [PATCH 02/12] watchdog: Use housekeeping_cpumask() instead of ad-hoc version Frederic Weisbecker
2017-10-27 12:02 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/isolation, " tip-bot for Frederic Weisbecker
2017-10-27 2:42 ` [PATCH 03/12] housekeeping: Provide a dynamic off-case to housekeeping_any_cpu() Frederic Weisbecker
2017-10-27 12:02 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/isolation: " tip-bot for Frederic Weisbecker
2017-10-27 2:42 ` [PATCH 04/12] housekeeping: Make housekeeping cpumask private Frederic Weisbecker
2017-10-27 12:03 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/isolation: Make the " tip-bot for Frederic Weisbecker
2017-10-27 2:42 ` [PATCH 05/12] housekeeping: Use its own static key Frederic Weisbecker
2017-10-27 12:03 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/isolation: " tip-bot for Frederic Weisbecker
2017-10-27 2:42 ` [PATCH 06/12] housekeeping: Rename is_housekeeping_cpu to housekeeping_cpu Frederic Weisbecker
2017-10-27 12:03 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/isolation: Rename is_housekeeping_cpu() to housekeeping_cpu() tip-bot for Frederic Weisbecker
2017-10-27 2:42 ` [PATCH 07/12] housekeeping: Move it under its own config, independent from NO_HZ Frederic Weisbecker
2017-10-27 12:04 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/isolation: Split out new CONFIG_CPU_ISOLATION=y config from CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL tip-bot for Frederic Weisbecker
2017-10-27 2:42 ` [PATCH 08/12] housekeeping: Introduce housekeeping flags Frederic Weisbecker
2017-10-27 12:04 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/isolation: " tip-bot for Frederic Weisbecker
2017-10-27 2:42 ` [PATCH 09/12] housekeeping: Handle the nohz_full= parameter Frederic Weisbecker
2017-10-27 12:05 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/isolation: " tip-bot for Frederic Weisbecker
2017-10-27 2:42 ` [PATCH 10/12] housekeeping: Move isolcpus to housekeeping Frederic Weisbecker
2017-10-27 12:05 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/isolation: Move isolcpus= handling to the housekeeping code tip-bot for Frederic Weisbecker
2017-10-27 2:42 ` [PATCH 11/12] housekeeping: Add basic isolcpus flags Frederic Weisbecker
2017-10-27 12:05 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/isolation: " tip-bot for Frederic Weisbecker
2017-10-27 2:42 ` [PATCH 12/12] housekeeping: Document " Frederic Weisbecker
2017-10-27 12:06 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/isolation: Document the isolcpus= flags tip-bot for Frederic Weisbecker
2017-10-27 13:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-10-27 14:36 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-10-27 17:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-10-27 17:33 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-10-27 18:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-10-27 18:39 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-10-27 19:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-10-27 14:38 ` Mike Galbraith
2017-10-30 15:48 ` Christopher Lameter
2017-10-30 16:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-10-30 16:30 ` Christopher Lameter [this message]
2017-10-30 16:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-10-30 16:56 ` Mike Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1710301125060.1182@nuc-kabylake \
--to=cl@linux.com \
--cc=cmetcalf@mellanox.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kernellwp@gmail.com \
--cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).