From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com, tony.luck@intel.com,
gavin.hindman@intel.com, vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com,
dave.hansen@intel.com, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V2 11/22] x86/intel_rdt: Associate pseudo-locked regions with its domain
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 00:19:49 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1802200017130.1853@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7bd1f8e8-116f-bdb2-23d2-a94f9a21e028@intel.com>
On Mon, 19 Feb 2018, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On 2/19/2018 1:19 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 Feb 2018, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> >
> >> After a pseudo-locked region is locked it needs to be associated with
> >> the RDT domain representing the pseudo-locked cache so that its life
> >> cycle can be managed correctly.
> >>
> >> Only a single pseudo-locked region can exist on any cache instance so we
> >> maintain a single pointer to a pseudo-locked region from each RDT
> >> domain.
> >
> > Why is only a single pseudo locked region possible?
>
> The setup of a pseudo-locked region requires the usage of wbinvd. If a
> second pseudo-locked region is thus attempted it will evict the
> pseudo-locked data of the first.
Why does it neeed wbinvd? wbinvd is a big hammer. What's wrong with clflush?
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-19 23:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-13 15:46 [RFC PATCH V2 00/22] Intel(R) Resource Director Technology Cache Pseudo-Locking enabling Reinette Chatre
2018-02-13 15:46 ` [RFC PATCH V2 01/22] x86/intel_rdt: Documentation for Cache Pseudo-Locking Reinette Chatre
2018-02-19 20:35 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-02-19 22:15 ` Reinette Chatre
2018-02-19 22:19 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-02-19 22:24 ` Reinette Chatre
2018-02-19 21:27 ` Randy Dunlap
2018-02-19 22:21 ` Reinette Chatre
2018-02-13 15:46 ` [RFC PATCH V2 02/22] x86/intel_rdt: Make useful functions available internally Reinette Chatre
2018-02-13 15:46 ` [RFC PATCH V2 03/22] x86/intel_rdt: Introduce hooks to create pseudo-locking files Reinette Chatre
2018-02-13 15:46 ` [RFC PATCH V2 04/22] x86/intel_rdt: Introduce test to determine if closid is in use Reinette Chatre
2018-02-13 15:46 ` [RFC PATCH V2 05/22] x86/intel_rdt: Print more accurate pseudo-locking availability Reinette Chatre
2018-02-13 15:46 ` [RFC PATCH V2 06/22] x86/intel_rdt: Create pseudo-locked regions Reinette Chatre
2018-02-19 20:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-02-19 23:02 ` Reinette Chatre
2018-02-19 23:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-02-20 3:21 ` Reinette Chatre
2018-02-13 15:46 ` [RFC PATCH V2 07/22] x86/intel_rdt: Connect pseudo-locking directory to operations Reinette Chatre
2018-02-13 15:46 ` [RFC PATCH V2 08/22] x86/intel_rdt: Introduce pseudo-locking resctrl files Reinette Chatre
2018-02-19 21:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-02-13 15:46 ` [RFC PATCH V2 09/22] x86/intel_rdt: Discover supported platforms via prefetch disable bits Reinette Chatre
2018-02-13 15:46 ` [RFC PATCH V2 10/22] x86/intel_rdt: Disable pseudo-locking if CDP enabled Reinette Chatre
2018-02-13 15:46 ` [RFC PATCH V2 11/22] x86/intel_rdt: Associate pseudo-locked regions with its domain Reinette Chatre
2018-02-19 21:19 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-02-19 23:00 ` Reinette Chatre
2018-02-19 23:19 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2018-02-20 3:17 ` Reinette Chatre
2018-02-20 10:00 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-02-20 16:02 ` Reinette Chatre
2018-02-20 17:18 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-02-13 15:46 ` [RFC PATCH V2 12/22] x86/intel_rdt: Support CBM checking from value and character buffer Reinette Chatre
2018-02-13 15:46 ` [RFC PATCH V2 13/22] x86/intel_rdt: Support schemata write - pseudo-locking core Reinette Chatre
2018-02-20 17:15 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-02-20 18:47 ` Reinette Chatre
2018-02-20 23:21 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-02-21 1:58 ` Mike Kravetz
2018-02-21 6:10 ` Reinette Chatre
2018-02-21 8:34 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-02-21 5:58 ` Reinette Chatre
2018-02-27 0:34 ` Reinette Chatre
2018-02-27 10:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-02-27 15:38 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-02-27 19:52 ` Reinette Chatre
2018-02-27 21:33 ` Reinette Chatre
2018-02-28 18:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-02-28 19:17 ` Reinette Chatre
2018-02-28 19:40 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-02-27 21:01 ` Reinette Chatre
2018-02-28 17:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-02-28 17:59 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-02-28 18:34 ` Reinette Chatre
2018-02-28 18:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-02-13 15:46 ` [RFC PATCH V2 14/22] x86/intel_rdt: Enable testing for pseudo-locked region Reinette Chatre
2018-02-13 15:46 ` [RFC PATCH V2 15/22] x86/intel_rdt: Prevent new allocations from pseudo-locked regions Reinette Chatre
2018-02-13 15:47 ` [RFC PATCH V2 16/22] x86/intel_rdt: Create debugfs files for pseudo-locking testing Reinette Chatre
2018-02-13 15:47 ` [RFC PATCH V2 17/22] x86/intel_rdt: Create character device exposing pseudo-locked region Reinette Chatre
2018-02-13 15:47 ` [RFC PATCH V2 18/22] x86/intel_rdt: More precise L2 hit/miss measurements Reinette Chatre
2018-02-13 15:47 ` [RFC PATCH V2 19/22] x86/intel_rdt: Support L3 cache performance event of Broadwell Reinette Chatre
2018-02-13 15:47 ` [RFC PATCH V2 20/22] x86/intel_rdt: Limit C-states dynamically when pseudo-locking active Reinette Chatre
2018-02-13 15:47 ` [RFC PATCH V2 21/22] mm/hugetlb: Enable large allocations through gigantic page API Reinette Chatre
2018-02-13 15:47 ` [RFC PATCH V2 22/22] x86/intel_rdt: Support contiguous memory of all sizes Reinette Chatre
2018-02-14 18:12 ` [RFC PATCH V2 00/22] Intel(R) Resource Director Technology Cache Pseudo-Locking enabling Mike Kravetz
2018-02-14 18:31 ` Reinette Chatre
2018-02-15 20:39 ` Reinette Chatre
2018-02-15 21:10 ` Mike Kravetz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.21.1802200017130.1853@nanos.tec.linutronix.de \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=gavin.hindman@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).