linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH -rt] Updates-from-Jon-Masters-for-hwlat_detector.c.patch
@ 2009-10-22 22:12 John Kacur
  2009-11-02 15:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: John Kacur @ 2009-10-22 22:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, Thomas Gleixner, Jon Masters; +Cc: linux-rt-users, Clark Williams

Hello Thomas

I took Jon Masters' latest hwlat_detector patch for upstream, and grabbed 
the bits that aren't currently in -rt. The patch is fairly small.

Please consider it for the next -rt release.

John

>From 97e12a96f58eea70c6a223ac849ec894165884b5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jon Masters <jcm@jonmasters.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:33:56 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Updates from Jon Masters for hwlat_detector.c

Signed-off-by: Jon Masters <jcm@jonmasters.org>
Signed-off-by: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/misc/Kconfig          |    2 +-
 drivers/misc/hwlat_detector.c |   16 ++++++++++++----
 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/misc/Kconfig b/drivers/misc/Kconfig
index 15cd6bc..35f441c 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/misc/Kconfig
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ config IBM_ASM
 config HWLAT_DETECTOR
 	tristate "Testing module to detect hardware-induced latencies"
 	depends on DEBUG_FS
-	select RING_BUFFER
+	depends on RING_BUFFER
 	default m
 	---help---
 	  A simple hardware latency detector. Use this module to detect
diff --git a/drivers/misc/hwlat_detector.c b/drivers/misc/hwlat_detector.c
index be6553f..7191e17 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/hwlat_detector.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/hwlat_detector.c
@@ -262,6 +262,8 @@ static int get_sample(void *unused)
 		/* Keep a running maximum ever recorded hardware latency */
 		if (sample > data.max_sample)
 			data.max_sample = sample;
+
+		wake_up(&data.wq); /* wake up reader(s) */
 	}
 
 	ret = 0;
@@ -299,8 +301,6 @@ static int kthread_fn(void *unused)
 			goto err_out;
 		}
 
-		wake_up(&data.wq); /* wake up reader(s) */
-
 		interval = data.sample_window - data.sample_width;
 		do_div(interval, USEC_PER_MSEC); /* modifies interval value */
 
@@ -607,7 +607,11 @@ static ssize_t  debug_enable_fwrite(struct file *filp,
 		if (!enabled)
 			goto unlock;
 		enabled = 0;
-		stop_kthread();
+		err = stop_kthread();
+		if (0 != err) {
+			printk(KERN_ERR BANNER "cannot stop kthread\n");
+			return -EFAULT;
+		}
 		wake_up(&data.wq);		/* reader(s) should return */
 	}
 unlock:
@@ -1194,9 +1198,13 @@ out:
  */
 static void detector_exit(void)
 {
+	int err;
+
 	if (enabled) {
 		enabled = 0;
-		stop_kthread();
+		err = stop_kthread();
+		if (0 != err)
+			printk(KERN_ERR BANNER "cannot stop kthread\n");
 	}
 
 	free_debugfs();
-- 
1.6.0.6

 

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH -rt] Updates-from-Jon-Masters-for-hwlat_detector.c.patch
  2009-10-22 22:12 [PATCH -rt] Updates-from-Jon-Masters-for-hwlat_detector.c.patch John Kacur
@ 2009-11-02 15:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
  2009-11-02 19:46   ` John Kacur
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2009-11-02 15:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: John Kacur; +Cc: linux-kernel, Jon Masters, linux-rt-users, Clark Williams

Hi,

On Fri, 23 Oct 2009, John Kacur wrote:
> I took Jon Masters' latest hwlat_detector patch for upstream, and grabbed 
> the bits that aren't currently in -rt. The patch is fairly small.
> 
> Please consider it for the next -rt release.

Not really.

> diff --git a/drivers/misc/hwlat_detector.c b/drivers/misc/hwlat_detector.c
> index be6553f..7191e17 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/hwlat_detector.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/hwlat_detector.c
> @@ -262,6 +262,8 @@ static int get_sample(void *unused)
>  		/* Keep a running maximum ever recorded hardware latency */
>  		if (sample > data.max_sample)
>  			data.max_sample = sample;
> +
> +		wake_up(&data.wq); /* wake up reader(s) */
>  	}
>  
>  	ret = 0;
> @@ -299,8 +301,6 @@ static int kthread_fn(void *unused)
>  			goto err_out;
>  		}
>  
> -		wake_up(&data.wq); /* wake up reader(s) */
> -

This reverts -rt commit 5fc485f6341c177e9d5f641c6fb9e33ca465aa84. 

CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK_SLEEP resp. CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT will tell you
why this is a bad idea on -rt :)

Thanks,

	tglx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH -rt] Updates-from-Jon-Masters-for-hwlat_detector.c.patch
  2009-11-02 15:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
@ 2009-11-02 19:46   ` John Kacur
  2009-11-03 13:15     ` Thomas Gleixner
  2009-11-03 15:17     ` Jon Masters
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: John Kacur @ 2009-11-02 19:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Gleixner; +Cc: linux-kernel, Jon Masters, linux-rt-users, Clark Williams

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1488 bytes --]

On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 23 Oct 2009, John Kacur wrote:
>> I took Jon Masters' latest hwlat_detector patch for upstream, and grabbed
>> the bits that aren't currently in -rt. The patch is fairly small.
>>
>> Please consider it for the next -rt release.
>
> Not really.
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/misc/hwlat_detector.c b/drivers/misc/hwlat_detector.c
>> index be6553f..7191e17 100644
>> --- a/drivers/misc/hwlat_detector.c
>> +++ b/drivers/misc/hwlat_detector.c
>> @@ -262,6 +262,8 @@ static int get_sample(void *unused)
>>               /* Keep a running maximum ever recorded hardware latency */
>>               if (sample > data.max_sample)
>>                       data.max_sample = sample;
>> +
>> +             wake_up(&data.wq); /* wake up reader(s) */
>>       }
>>
>>       ret = 0;
>> @@ -299,8 +301,6 @@ static int kthread_fn(void *unused)
>>                       goto err_out;
>>               }
>>
>> -             wake_up(&data.wq); /* wake up reader(s) */
>> -
>
> This reverts -rt commit 5fc485f6341c177e9d5f641c6fb9e33ca465aa84.
>
> CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK_SLEEP resp. CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT will tell you
> why this is a bad idea on -rt :)
>
> Thanks,
>
>        tglx
> --

Ugh. Thanks for catching that. To be honest not sure how it happened,
so it must be my fault. :)

Updated patch just adds the error checking from Jon Masters then,
patched against -rt.

[-- Attachment #2: 0001-Updates-from-Jon-Masters-for-hwlat_detector.c.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 1651 bytes --]

From 06219178c632d9a949029ade1a85033629365dbf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jon Masters <jcm@jonmasters.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:33:56 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Updates from Jon Masters for hwlat_detector.c

Signed-off-by: Jon Masters <jcm@jonmasters.org>
Signed-off-by: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/misc/Kconfig          |    2 +-
 drivers/misc/hwlat_detector.c |   12 ++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/misc/Kconfig b/drivers/misc/Kconfig
index 15cd6bc..35f441c 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/misc/Kconfig
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ config IBM_ASM
 config HWLAT_DETECTOR
 	tristate "Testing module to detect hardware-induced latencies"
 	depends on DEBUG_FS
-	select RING_BUFFER
+	depends on RING_BUFFER
 	default m
 	---help---
 	  A simple hardware latency detector. Use this module to detect
diff --git a/drivers/misc/hwlat_detector.c b/drivers/misc/hwlat_detector.c
index be6553f..0ffb43a 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/hwlat_detector.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/hwlat_detector.c
@@ -607,7 +607,11 @@ static ssize_t  debug_enable_fwrite(struct file *filp,
 		if (!enabled)
 			goto unlock;
 		enabled = 0;
-		stop_kthread();
+		err = stop_kthread();
+		if (0 != err) {
+			printk(KERN_ERR BANNER "cannot stop kthread\n");
+			return -EFAULT;
+		}
 		wake_up(&data.wq);		/* reader(s) should return */
 	}
 unlock:
@@ -1194,9 +1198,13 @@ out:
  */
 static void detector_exit(void)
 {
+	int err;
+
 	if (enabled) {
 		enabled = 0;
-		stop_kthread();
+		err = stop_kthread();
+		if (0 != err)
+			printk(KERN_ERR BANNER "cannot stop kthread\n");
 	}
 
 	free_debugfs();
-- 
1.6.0.6


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH -rt] Updates-from-Jon-Masters-for-hwlat_detector.c.patch
  2009-11-02 19:46   ` John Kacur
@ 2009-11-03 13:15     ` Thomas Gleixner
  2009-11-03 13:50       ` John Kacur
  2009-11-03 15:17     ` Jon Masters
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2009-11-03 13:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: John Kacur; +Cc: linux-kernel, Jon Masters, linux-rt-users, Clark Williams

On Mon, 2 Nov 2009, John Kacur wrote:
> Updated patch just adds the error checking from Jon Masters then,
> patched against -rt.

Can you please inline patches ?

@@ -607,7 +607,11 @@ static ssize_t  debug_enable_fwrite(stru
 		if (!enabled)
 			goto unlock;
 		enabled = 0;
-		stop_kthread();
+		err = stop_kthread();
+		if (0 != err) {

	Eeew !	

Thanks,

	tglx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH -rt] Updates-from-Jon-Masters-for-hwlat_detector.c.patch
  2009-11-03 13:15     ` Thomas Gleixner
@ 2009-11-03 13:50       ` John Kacur
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: John Kacur @ 2009-11-03 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Gleixner; +Cc: linux-kernel, Jon Masters, linux-rt-users, Clark Williams



On Tue, 3 Nov 2009, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

> On Mon, 2 Nov 2009, John Kacur wrote:
> > Updated patch just adds the error checking from Jon Masters then,
> > patched against -rt.
> 
> Can you please inline patches ?
> 
> @@ -607,7 +607,11 @@ static ssize_t  debug_enable_fwrite(stru
>  		if (!enabled)
>  			goto unlock;
>  		enabled = 0;
> -		stop_kthread();
> +		err = stop_kthread();
> +		if (0 != err) {
> 
> 	Eeew !	

Yeah, I saw that too and thought it a bit ugly. However, my goal was only 
to make sure that the latest version of Jon's hwlat patch got into -rt, so 
I didn't think it was my place to "fix" his style.

Note - even the much hated checkpatch program doesn't balk at that. 
However that is hardly an authority.

If you read the introduction to "Expert C Programming - Deep C Secrets", 
they mention that some programmers write
if (3==i)
instead of
if (i==3)

because if you mistakenly only type one '=', then the compiler can 
complain about it, instead of silently assigning 3 to i.

I can only guess that is the sort of idea / habit that Jon got that style 
from.

John

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH -rt] Updates-from-Jon-Masters-for-hwlat_detector.c.patch
  2009-11-02 19:46   ` John Kacur
  2009-11-03 13:15     ` Thomas Gleixner
@ 2009-11-03 15:17     ` Jon Masters
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jon Masters @ 2009-11-03 15:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: John Kacur; +Cc: Thomas Gleixner, linux-kernel, linux-rt-users, Clark Williams

On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 20:46 +0100, John Kacur wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:

> >> diff --git a/drivers/misc/hwlat_detector.c b/drivers/misc/hwlat_detector.c
> >> index be6553f..7191e17 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/misc/hwlat_detector.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/misc/hwlat_detector.c
> >> @@ -262,6 +262,8 @@ static int get_sample(void *unused)
> >>               /* Keep a running maximum ever recorded hardware latency */
> >>               if (sample > data.max_sample)
> >>                       data.max_sample = sample;
> >> +
> >> +             wake_up(&data.wq); /* wake up reader(s) */
> >>       }
> >>
> >>       ret = 0;
> >> @@ -299,8 +301,6 @@ static int kthread_fn(void *unused)
> >>                       goto err_out;
> >>               }
> >>
> >> -             wake_up(&data.wq); /* wake up reader(s) */
> >> -
> >
> > This reverts -rt commit 5fc485f6341c177e9d5f641c6fb9e33ca465aa84.
> >
> > CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK_SLEEP resp. CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT will tell you
> > why this is a bad idea on -rt :)
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >        tglx
> > --
> 
> Ugh. Thanks for catching that. To be honest not sure how it happened,
> so it must be my fault. :)
> 
> Updated patch just adds the error checking from Jon Masters then,
> patched against -rt.

Actually, I think it might be my fault. I'll talk to you about the best
way to proceed with updates since we're still looking for a reproducer
on that lockup Clark was seeing a while back.

Jon.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-11-03 15:16 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-10-22 22:12 [PATCH -rt] Updates-from-Jon-Masters-for-hwlat_detector.c.patch John Kacur
2009-11-02 15:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-02 19:46   ` John Kacur
2009-11-03 13:15     ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-03 13:50       ` John Kacur
2009-11-03 15:17     ` Jon Masters

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).