From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>,
"Alasdair G. Kergon" <agk@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com
Subject: Re: block: flush queued bios when the process blocks
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 10:26:48 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1510061020200.20214@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151006134753.GA30555@redhat.com>
On Tue, 6 Oct 2015, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 06 2015 at 9:28am -0400,
> Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 5 Oct 2015, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> >
> > > Mikulas,
> > >
> > > Could it be that cond_resched() wasn't unplugging? As was
> > > recently raised in this thread: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/18/378
> > > Chris Mason's patch from that thread fixed this issue... I _think_ Linus
> > > has since committed Chris' work but I haven't kept my finger on the
> > > pulse of that issue.
> >
> > I think it doesn't matter (regarding correctness) if cond_reched unplugs
> > on not. If it didn't unplug, the process will be scheduled later, and it
> > will eventually reach the point where it unplugs.
>
> Couldn't the original deadlock you fixed (as described in your first
> patch) manifest when a new process is scheduled?
A process rescheduled with cond_reched is not stuck, it will be run later.
It may contribute to increased request latency, but it can't contribute to
a deadlock.
Mikulas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-06 14:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-27 15:03 [PATCH] block: flush queued bios when the process blocks Mikulas Patocka
2014-05-27 15:08 ` Jens Axboe
2014-05-27 15:23 ` Mikulas Patocka
2014-05-27 15:42 ` Jens Axboe
2014-05-27 16:26 ` Mikulas Patocka
2014-05-27 17:33 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-05-27 19:56 ` Kent Overstreet
2015-10-05 19:50 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-05-27 17:42 ` [PATCH] " Jens Axboe
2014-05-27 18:14 ` [dm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2014-05-27 19:59 ` Kent Overstreet
2014-05-27 19:56 ` Mikulas Patocka
2014-05-27 20:06 ` Kent Overstreet
2014-05-29 23:52 ` Mikulas Patocka
2015-10-05 20:59 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-10-06 13:28 ` Mikulas Patocka
2015-10-06 13:47 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-10-06 14:10 ` Mikulas Patocka
2015-10-06 14:26 ` Mikulas Patocka [this message]
2015-10-06 18:17 ` [dm-devel] " Mikulas Patocka
2015-10-06 18:50 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-10-06 20:16 ` [PATCH v2] " Mike Snitzer
2015-10-06 20:26 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-10-08 15:04 ` Mikulas Patocka
2015-10-08 15:08 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-10-09 19:52 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-10-09 19:59 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-10-14 20:47 ` [PATCH v3 for-4.4] block: flush queued bios when process blocks to avoid deadlock Mike Snitzer
2015-10-14 21:44 ` Jeff Moyer
2015-10-17 16:04 ` Ming Lei
2015-10-20 19:57 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-10-20 20:03 ` Mikulas Patocka
2015-10-21 16:38 ` Ming Lei
2015-10-21 21:49 ` Mikulas Patocka
2015-10-22 1:53 ` Ming Lei
2015-10-15 3:27 ` [PATCH v2] block: flush queued bios when the process blocks Ming Lei
2015-10-15 8:06 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-10-16 3:08 ` Ming Lei
2015-10-16 15:29 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-10-17 15:54 ` Ming Lei
2015-10-09 11:58 ` kbuild test robot
2014-05-27 17:59 ` [PATCH] " Kent Overstreet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LRH.2.02.1510061020200.20214@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com \
--to=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=kmo@daterainc.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).