linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>
To: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>
Cc: jpoimboe@redhat.com, jeyu@redhat.com, pmladek@suse.com,
	corbet@lwn.net, live-patching@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/livepatch: remove the limitation for schedule() patching
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 02:33:56 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.20.1701110233430.25515@cbobk.fhfr.pm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170106140045.26331-1-mbenes@suse.cz>

On Fri, 6 Jan 2017, Miroslav Benes wrote:

> The Limitations section of the documentation describes the impossibility
> to livepatch anything that is inlined to __schedule() function. This had
> been true till 4.9 kernel came. Thanks to commit 0100301bfdf5
> ("sched/x86: Rewrite the switch_to() code") from Brian Gerst there is
> __switch_to_asm function now (implemented in assembly) called properly
> from context_switch(). RIP is thus saved on the stack and a task would
> return to proper version of __schedule() et al. functions.
> 
> Of course __switch_to_asm() is not patchable for the reason described in
> the section. But there is no __fentry__ call and I cannot imagine a
> reason to do it anyway.
> 
> Therefore, remove the paragraphs from the section.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>
> ---
> FWIW, I also tested this to be sure on top of the consistency model
> patch set. I patched schedule() function which calls __schedule() (it is
> impossible to patch it directly due to notrace attribute). It works well
> except...
> 
> 1. the patching process does not finish, because many tasks sleep in
> schedule. STOP/CONT signal does not help. I'll investigate.
> 
> 2. reversion of the process does not work as expected. The kernel
> crashes after the removal of the module. A task very likely slept in
> schedule and was not migrated properly. It might be because of the races
> in klp_reverse_transition() described by Petr, or might be somewhere
> else. I'll look into it.

Applied, thanks.

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs

      parent reply	other threads:[~2017-01-11  1:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-06 14:00 [PATCH] Documentation/livepatch: remove the limitation for schedule() patching Miroslav Benes
2017-01-06 15:01 ` Petr Mladek
2017-01-06 15:10   ` Miroslav Benes
2017-01-06 19:13 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-01-09 12:50   ` Miroslav Benes
2017-01-09 14:54     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-01-10 10:32       ` Miroslav Benes
2017-01-11  1:33 ` Jiri Kosina [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LSU.2.20.1701110233430.25515@cbobk.fhfr.pm \
    --to=jikos@kernel.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=jeyu@redhat.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).