* [PATCH] docs: livepatch: Fix a typo
@ 2021-03-25 6:56 Bhaskar Chowdhury
2021-03-25 9:05 ` Miroslav Benes
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Bhaskar Chowdhury @ 2021-03-25 6:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jpoimboe, jikos, mbenes, pmladek, joe.lawrence, corbet,
live-patching, linux-doc, linux-kernel
Cc: rdunlap, Bhaskar Chowdhury
s/varibles/variables/
Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com>
---
Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst b/Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst
index c05715aeafa4..8464866d18ba 100644
--- a/Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst
+++ b/Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst
@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ In-flight parent objects
Sometimes it may not be convenient or possible to allocate shadow
variables alongside their parent objects. Or a livepatch fix may
-require shadow varibles to only a subset of parent object instances. In
+require shadow variables to only a subset of parent object instances. In
these cases, the klp_shadow_get_or_alloc() call can be used to attach
shadow variables to parents already in-flight.
--
2.30.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] docs: livepatch: Fix a typo
2021-03-25 6:56 [PATCH] docs: livepatch: Fix a typo Bhaskar Chowdhury
@ 2021-03-25 9:05 ` Miroslav Benes
2021-03-25 9:11 ` Bhaskar Chowdhury
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Miroslav Benes @ 2021-03-25 9:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bhaskar Chowdhury
Cc: jpoimboe, jikos, pmladek, joe.lawrence, corbet, live-patching,
linux-doc, linux-kernel, rdunlap
Hi,
On Thu, 25 Mar 2021, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
>
> s/varibles/variables/
>
> Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com>
> ---
> Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst b/Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst
> index c05715aeafa4..8464866d18ba 100644
> --- a/Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst
> @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ In-flight parent objects
>
> Sometimes it may not be convenient or possible to allocate shadow
> variables alongside their parent objects. Or a livepatch fix may
> -require shadow varibles to only a subset of parent object instances. In
> +require shadow variables to only a subset of parent object instances. In
> these cases, the klp_shadow_get_or_alloc() call can be used to attach
> shadow variables to parents already in-flight.
you sent the same fix a couple of weeks ago and Jon applied it.
Miroslav
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] docs: livepatch: Fix a typo
2021-03-25 9:05 ` Miroslav Benes
@ 2021-03-25 9:11 ` Bhaskar Chowdhury
2021-03-25 9:18 ` Miroslav Benes
2021-03-25 13:43 ` Jonathan Corbet
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Bhaskar Chowdhury @ 2021-03-25 9:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Miroslav Benes
Cc: jpoimboe, jikos, pmladek, joe.lawrence, corbet, live-patching,
linux-doc, linux-kernel, rdunlap
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1298 bytes --]
On 10:05 Thu 25 Mar 2021, Miroslav Benes wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On Thu, 25 Mar 2021, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
>
>>
>> s/varibles/variables/
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst b/Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst
>> index c05715aeafa4..8464866d18ba 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst
>> @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ In-flight parent objects
>>
>> Sometimes it may not be convenient or possible to allocate shadow
>> variables alongside their parent objects. Or a livepatch fix may
>> -require shadow varibles to only a subset of parent object instances. In
>> +require shadow variables to only a subset of parent object instances. In
>> these cases, the klp_shadow_get_or_alloc() call can be used to attach
>> shadow variables to parents already in-flight.
>
>you sent the same fix a couple of weeks ago and Jon applied it.
>
Ah..difficult to remember....thanks for reminding ..it seems I need to keep
track ...which I don't do at this moment ...so the patch get duplicated ..
So.do you have any better policy to keep track???
>Miroslav
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] docs: livepatch: Fix a typo
2021-03-25 9:11 ` Bhaskar Chowdhury
@ 2021-03-25 9:18 ` Miroslav Benes
2021-03-25 13:43 ` Jonathan Corbet
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Miroslav Benes @ 2021-03-25 9:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bhaskar Chowdhury
Cc: jpoimboe, jikos, pmladek, joe.lawrence, corbet, live-patching,
linux-doc, linux-kernel, rdunlap
On Thu, 25 Mar 2021, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
> On 10:05 Thu 25 Mar 2021, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >On Thu, 25 Mar 2021, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> s/varibles/variables/
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >> Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst | 2 +-
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst
> >> b/Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst
> >> index c05715aeafa4..8464866d18ba 100644
> >> --- a/Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst
> >> +++ b/Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst
> >> @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ In-flight parent objects
> >>
> >> Sometimes it may not be convenient or possible to allocate shadow
> >> variables alongside their parent objects. Or a livepatch fix may
> >> -require shadow varibles to only a subset of parent object instances. In
> >> +require shadow variables to only a subset of parent object instances. In
> >> these cases, the klp_shadow_get_or_alloc() call can be used to attach
> >> shadow variables to parents already in-flight.
> >
> >you sent the same fix a couple of weeks ago and Jon applied it.
> >
> Ah..difficult to remember....thanks for reminding ..it seems I need to keep
> track ...which I don't do at this moment ...so the patch get duplicated ..
Well, you definitely should.
> So.do you have any better policy to keep track???
I do not send a large amount of typo fixes, so it is quite easy to keep
track of everything in my case. So please, just find something that suits
you.
Miroslav
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] docs: livepatch: Fix a typo
2021-03-25 9:11 ` Bhaskar Chowdhury
2021-03-25 9:18 ` Miroslav Benes
@ 2021-03-25 13:43 ` Jonathan Corbet
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Corbet @ 2021-03-25 13:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bhaskar Chowdhury, Miroslav Benes
Cc: jpoimboe, jikos, pmladek, joe.lawrence, live-patching, linux-doc,
linux-kernel, rdunlap
Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com> writes:
> On 10:05 Thu 25 Mar 2021, Miroslav Benes wrote:
>>you sent the same fix a couple of weeks ago and Jon applied it.
>>
> Ah..difficult to remember....thanks for reminding ..it seems I need to keep
> track ...which I don't do at this moment ...so the patch get duplicated ..
>
> So.do you have any better policy to keep track???
1) Look at the emails that maintainers like me send you when patches
are applied.
2) Work against linux-next.
jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-03-25 13:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-03-25 6:56 [PATCH] docs: livepatch: Fix a typo Bhaskar Chowdhury
2021-03-25 9:05 ` Miroslav Benes
2021-03-25 9:11 ` Bhaskar Chowdhury
2021-03-25 9:18 ` Miroslav Benes
2021-03-25 13:43 ` Jonathan Corbet
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).