From: Thomas Ilsche <thomas.ilsche@tu-dresden.de>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net>,
"Rik van Riel" <riel@surriel.com>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>,
"Mike Galbraith" <mgalbraith@suse.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFT][PATCH v7 5/8] cpuidle: Return nohz hint from cpuidle_select()
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 18:59:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b05c00e7-b5d8-0bcb-0b38-a91324ec597a@tu-dresden.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0j-CnEms-Wm0Op=386ceuG2GfAouVLXO48rbD_pUPJhMg@mail.gmail.com>
On 2018-03-21 15:36, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> So please disregard this one entirely and take the v7.2 replacement
> instead of it:https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10299429/
>
> The current versions (including the above) is in the git branch at
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git \
> idle-loop-v7.2
With v7.2 (tested on SKL-SP from git) I see similar behavior in idle
as with v5: several cores which just keep the sched tick enabled.
Worse yet, some go only in C1 (not even C1E!?) despite sleeping the
full sched tick.
The resulting power consumption is ~105 W instead of ~ 70 W.
https://wwwpub.zih.tu-dresden.de/~tilsche/powernightmares/v7_2_skl_sp_idle.png
I have briefly ran v7 and I believe it was also affected.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-21 18:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-20 15:12 [RFT][PATCH v7 0/8] sched/cpuidle: Idle loop rework Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-20 15:13 ` [RFT][PATCH v7 1/8] time: tick-sched: Reorganize idle tick management code Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-20 15:15 ` [RFT][PATCH v7 2/8] sched: idle: Do not stop the tick upfront in the idle loop Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-20 15:15 ` [RFT][PATCH v7 3/8] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-20 18:00 ` [Correction][RFT][PATCH v7 3/8] sched: idle: Do not stop the tick before cpuidle_idle_call() Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-20 15:16 ` [RFT][PATCH v7 4/8] jiffies: Introduce USER_TICK_USEC and redefine TICK_USEC Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-20 15:45 ` [RFT][PATCH v7 5/8] cpuidle: Return nohz hint from cpuidle_select() Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-21 6:48 ` [RFT][PATCH v7.1 " Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-21 11:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-21 13:03 ` [RFT][PATCH v7.2 " Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-21 14:36 ` [RFT][PATCH v7 " Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-21 17:59 ` Thomas Ilsche [this message]
2018-03-21 22:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-22 13:18 ` Thomas Ilsche
2018-03-22 17:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-22 6:24 ` Doug Smythies
2018-03-22 15:41 ` Doug Smythies
2018-03-22 17:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-21 18:23 ` Doug Smythies
2018-03-22 17:40 ` [RFT][PATCH v7.3 " Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-28 9:14 ` Thomas Ilsche
2018-03-30 9:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-04-10 15:22 ` Thomas Ilsche
2018-03-22 20:46 ` Doug Smythies
2018-03-20 15:45 ` [RFT][PATCH v7 6/8] sched: idle: Select idle state before stopping the tick Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-27 21:50 ` Thomas Ilsche
2018-03-27 22:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-28 8:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-28 8:38 ` Thomas Ilsche
2018-03-28 10:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-28 10:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-28 15:15 ` Thomas Ilsche
2018-03-28 20:41 ` Doug Smythies
2018-03-28 23:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-20 15:46 ` [RFT][PATCH v7 7/8] cpuidle: menu: Refine idle state selection for running tick Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-20 15:47 ` [RFT][PATCH v7 8/8] cpuidle: menu: Avoid selecting shallow states with stopped tick Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-20 17:52 ` [RFT][PATCH v7 3/8] sched: idle: Do not stop the tick upfront in the idle loop Doug Smythies
2018-03-20 18:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-21 12:31 ` [RFT][PATCH v7 0/8] sched/cpuidle: Idle loop rework Rik van Riel
2018-03-21 13:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-03-21 14:53 ` Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b05c00e7-b5d8-0bcb-0b38-a91324ec597a@tu-dresden.de \
--to=thomas.ilsche@tu-dresden.de \
--cc=aubrey.li@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dsmythies@telus.net \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgalbraith@suse.de \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).