linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
To: x86@kernel.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 07/13] x86/fault: Make error_code sanitization more robust
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 14:45:31 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b31159bd55bd0c4fa061a20dfd6c429c094bebaa.1542667307.git.luto@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1542667307.git.luto@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1542667307.git.luto@kernel.org>

The error code in a page fault on a kernel address indicates
whether that address is mapped, which should not be revealed in a signal.
The normal code path for a page fault on a kernel address sanitizes the bit,
but the paths for vsyscall emulation and SIGBUS do not.  Both are
harmless, but for subtle reasons.  SIGBUS is never sent for a kernel
address, and vsyscall emulation will never fault on a kernel address
per se because it will fail an access_ok() check instead.

Make the code more robust by adding a helper that sets the relevant
fields and sanitizing the error code in the helper.  This also
cleans up the code -- we had three copies of roughly the same thing.

Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
---
 arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
index bd89b6f83aa2..fac931d89c23 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
@@ -631,6 +631,24 @@ pgtable_bad(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
 	oops_end(flags, regs, sig);
 }
 
+static void set_signal_archinfo(unsigned long address,
+				unsigned long error_code)
+{
+	struct task_struct *tsk = current;
+
+	/*
+	 * To avoid leaking information about the kernel page
+	 * table layout, pretend that user-mode accesses to
+	 * kernel addresses are always protection faults.
+	 */
+	if (address >= TASK_SIZE_MAX)
+		error_code |= X86_PF_PROT;
+
+	tsk->thread.trap_nr = X86_TRAP_PF;
+	tsk->thread.error_code = error_code | X86_PF_USER;
+	tsk->thread.cr2 = address;
+}
+
 static noinline void
 no_context(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
 	   unsigned long address, int signal, int si_code)
@@ -656,9 +674,7 @@ no_context(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
 		 * faulting through the emulate_vsyscall() logic.
 		 */
 		if (current->thread.sig_on_uaccess_err && signal) {
-			tsk->thread.trap_nr = X86_TRAP_PF;
-			tsk->thread.error_code = error_code | X86_PF_USER;
-			tsk->thread.cr2 = address;
+			set_signal_archinfo(address, error_code);
 
 			/* XXX: hwpoison faults will set the wrong code. */
 			force_sig_fault(signal, si_code, (void __user *)address,
@@ -821,9 +837,7 @@ __bad_area_nosemaphore(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
 		if (likely(show_unhandled_signals))
 			show_signal_msg(regs, error_code, address, tsk);
 
-		tsk->thread.cr2		= address;
-		tsk->thread.error_code	= error_code;
-		tsk->thread.trap_nr	= X86_TRAP_PF;
+		set_signal_archinfo(address, error_code);
 
 		if (si_code == SEGV_PKUERR)
 			force_sig_pkuerr((void __user *)address, pkey);
@@ -937,9 +951,7 @@ do_sigbus(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code, unsigned long address,
 	if (is_prefetch(regs, error_code, address))
 		return;
 
-	tsk->thread.cr2		= address;
-	tsk->thread.error_code	= error_code;
-	tsk->thread.trap_nr	= X86_TRAP_PF;
+	set_signal_archinfo(address, error_code);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE
 	if (fault & (VM_FAULT_HWPOISON|VM_FAULT_HWPOISON_LARGE)) {
-- 
2.17.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-11-19 22:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-19 22:45 [PATCH 00/13] x86/fault: #PF improvements, mostly related to USER bit Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-19 22:45 ` [PATCH 01/13] x86/fault: Check user_mode(regs) when avoiding an mmap_sem deadlock Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-20  8:14   ` [tip:x86/mm] " tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-20  8:15   ` [PATCH 01/13] " Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-19 22:45 ` [PATCH 02/13] x86/fault: Check user_mode(regs) when validating a stack extension Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-20  7:39   ` Ingo Molnar
2018-11-20  8:13     ` Ingo Molnar
2018-11-19 22:45 ` [PATCH 03/13] x86/cpufeatures, x86/fault: Mark SMAP as disabled when configured out Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-20  8:15   ` [tip:x86/mm] " tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-19 22:45 ` [PATCH 04/13] x86/fault: Fold smap_violation() into do_user_addr_fault() Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-20  8:15   ` [tip:x86/mm] " tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-19 22:45 ` [PATCH 05/13] x86/fault: Fix SMAP #PF handling buglet for implicit supervisor accesses Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-20  8:16   ` [tip:x86/mm] " tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-19 22:45 ` [PATCH 06/13] x86/fault: Improve the condition for signalling vs OOPSing Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-20  8:16   ` [tip:x86/mm] " tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-19 22:45 ` Andy Lutomirski [this message]
2018-11-20  8:17   ` [tip:x86/mm] x86/fault: Make error_code sanitization more robust tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-19 22:45 ` [PATCH 08/13] x86/fault: Don't set thread.cr2, etc before OOPSing Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-20  8:17   ` [tip:x86/mm] " tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-19 22:45 ` [PATCH 09/13] x86/fault: Remove sw_error_code Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-19 22:45 ` [PATCH 10/13] x86/fault: Don't try to recover from an implicit supervisor access Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-19 22:45 ` [PATCH 11/13] x86/oops: Show the correct CS value in show_regs() Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-19 22:45 ` [PATCH 12/13] x86/fault: Decode page fault OOPSes better Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-27 14:46   ` Sean Christopherson
2018-11-19 22:45 ` [PATCH 13/13] x86/vsyscall/64: Use X86_PF constants in the simulated #PF error code Andy Lutomirski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b31159bd55bd0c4fa061a20dfd6c429c094bebaa.1542667307.git.luto@kernel.org \
    --to=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yu-cheng.yu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).