Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: mmc: mmci: add a property to disable DMA LLI

From: Yann Gautier <yann.gautier@foss.st.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
	Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
	Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@foss.st.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@foss.st.com>,
	Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>, Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>,
	<kernel@dh-electronics.com>,
	Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>,
	Grzegorz Szymaszek <gszymaszek@short.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: mmc: mmci: add a property to disable DMA LLI
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 16:59:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b465353f-9291-f159-ba0b-4cd9577fc676@foss.st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFq_TsBLjW2WxC-Fvu6qDs9MJ1=QPo9gOLRykJ5p2pJbGw@mail.gmail.com>

On 3/8/22 11:57, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> Hi Yann,
> 
> On Fri, 4 Mar 2022 at 14:52, Yann Gautier <yann.gautier@foss.st.com> wrote:
>>
>> On STMicroelectronics variant of PL18x, the DMA Linked Lists are supported
>> starting from revision v2 of the peripheral. But it has limitations,
>> as all the buffers should be aligned on block size (except the last one).
>> But this cannot be guaranteed with SDIO. We should then have a property
>> to disable the support of LLI.
> 
> Indeed, the buffer handling with SDIO is somewhat special, which also
> has been discussed several times on LKML before. In principle, we need
> the SDIO func drivers to respect buffer limitations that should be
> specified by the mmc host drivers. Quite similar to what we already
> have for block devices, like ->max_seg_size, ->max_seg, etc, that is
> set per mmc host.
> 
> I realize that implementing something like the above requires bigger
> changes, which is why mmc host drivers instead validates the sglists
> and the elements. In some cases that means returning an error code and
> in others it could mean falling back to a non-DMA based I/O mode.
> 
> For the stm32_sdmmc variant, it looks like the sglist validation is
> being managed in sdmmc_idma_validate_data() already. Can it be
> extended to cover this case too, rather than using a DT property?
> 
> Kind regards
> Uffe

Hi Ulf,

OK, I'll check what can be done for this. Patches 1 and 2 can be 
dropped, they will be reworked.
But patch 3 of this series could be taken, as not linked to LLI 
management. Should I push it again alone, or could you review it directly?

Best regards,
Yann

> 
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yann Gautier <yann.gautier@foss.st.com>
>> ---
>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/arm,pl18x.yaml | 5 +++++
>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/arm,pl18x.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/arm,pl18x.yaml
>> index 1e69a5a42439..309a2c0426e5 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/arm,pl18x.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/arm,pl18x.yaml
>> @@ -145,6 +145,11 @@ properties:
>>         driver to sample the receive data (for example with a voltage switch
>>         transceiver).
>>
>> +  st,disable-dma-lli:
>> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/flag
>> +    description: ST Micro-specific property, disable DMA linked lists.
>> +      It is used for SDIO.
>> +
>>     st,cmd-gpios:
>>       maxItems: 1
>>       description:
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>