* [PATCH 0/3] regulator: debugging aids
@ 2020-09-26 21:32 Michał Mirosław
2020-09-26 21:32 ` [PATCH 2/3] regulator: print symbolic errors in kernel messages Michał Mirosław
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Michał Mirosław @ 2020-09-26 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jon Hunter, Liam Girdwood, Mark Brown; +Cc: linux-kernel
Three simple patches to aid in debugging regulators.
Michał Mirosław (3):
regulator: print state at boot
regulator: print symbolic errors in kernel messages
regulator: resolve supply after creating regulator
drivers/regulator/core.c | 124 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
--
2.20.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/3] regulator: print state at boot
2020-09-26 21:32 [PATCH 0/3] regulator: debugging aids Michał Mirosław
2020-09-26 21:32 ` [PATCH 2/3] regulator: print symbolic errors in kernel messages Michał Mirosław
@ 2020-09-26 21:32 ` Michał Mirosław
2020-09-26 21:32 ` [PATCH 3/3] regulator: resolve supply after creating regulator Michał Mirosław
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Michał Mirosław @ 2020-09-26 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Liam Girdwood, Mark Brown, Jon Hunter; +Cc: linux-kernel
Make the initial state of the regulator shown when debugging.
Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
---
drivers/regulator/core.c | 9 +++++++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index 9238613a8c26..bf88d74f5401 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -1114,10 +1114,15 @@ static void print_constraints(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
if (constraints->valid_modes_mask & REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE)
count += scnprintf(buf + count, len - count, "idle ");
if (constraints->valid_modes_mask & REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY)
- count += scnprintf(buf + count, len - count, "standby");
+ count += scnprintf(buf + count, len - count, "standby ");
if (!count)
- scnprintf(buf, len, "no parameters");
+ count = scnprintf(buf, len, "no parameters");
+ else
+ --count;
+
+ count += scnprintf(buf + count, len - count, ", %s",
+ _regulator_is_enabled(rdev) ? "enabled" : "disabled");
rdev_dbg(rdev, "%s\n", buf);
--
2.20.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/3] regulator: print symbolic errors in kernel messages
2020-09-26 21:32 [PATCH 0/3] regulator: debugging aids Michał Mirosław
@ 2020-09-26 21:32 ` Michał Mirosław
2020-09-26 21:32 ` [PATCH 1/3] regulator: print state at boot Michał Mirosław
2020-09-26 21:32 ` [PATCH 3/3] regulator: resolve supply after creating regulator Michał Mirosław
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Michał Mirosław @ 2020-09-26 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jon Hunter, Liam Girdwood, Mark Brown; +Cc: linux-kernel
Change all error-printing messages to include error name via %pe instead
of numeric error or nothing.
Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
---
drivers/regulator/core.c | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index bf88d74f5401..6b56a22fd37f 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -967,7 +967,8 @@ static int drms_uA_update(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
/* set the optimum mode for our new total regulator load */
err = rdev->desc->ops->set_load(rdev, current_uA);
if (err < 0)
- rdev_err(rdev, "failed to set load %d\n", current_uA);
+ rdev_err(rdev, "failed to set load %d: %pe\n",
+ current_uA, ERR_PTR(err));
} else {
/* get output voltage */
output_uV = regulator_get_voltage_rdev(rdev);
@@ -994,14 +995,15 @@ static int drms_uA_update(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
/* check the new mode is allowed */
err = regulator_mode_constrain(rdev, &mode);
if (err < 0) {
- rdev_err(rdev, "failed to get optimum mode @ %d uA %d -> %d uV\n",
- current_uA, input_uV, output_uV);
+ rdev_err(rdev, "failed to get optimum mode @ %d uA %d -> %d uV: %pe\n",
+ current_uA, input_uV, output_uV, ERR_PTR(err));
return err;
}
err = rdev->desc->ops->set_mode(rdev, mode);
if (err < 0)
- rdev_err(rdev, "failed to set optimum mode %x\n", mode);
+ rdev_err(rdev, "failed to set optimum mode %x: %pe\n",
+ mode, ERR_PTR(err));
}
return err;
@@ -1022,14 +1024,14 @@ static int __suspend_set_state(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
ret = 0;
if (ret < 0) {
- rdev_err(rdev, "failed to enabled/disable\n");
+ rdev_err(rdev, "failed to enabled/disable: %pe\n", ERR_PTR(ret));
return ret;
}
if (rdev->desc->ops->set_suspend_voltage && rstate->uV > 0) {
ret = rdev->desc->ops->set_suspend_voltage(rdev, rstate->uV);
if (ret < 0) {
- rdev_err(rdev, "failed to set voltage\n");
+ rdev_err(rdev, "failed to set voltage: %pe\n", ERR_PTR(ret));
return ret;
}
}
@@ -1037,7 +1039,7 @@ static int __suspend_set_state(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
if (rdev->desc->ops->set_suspend_mode && rstate->mode > 0) {
ret = rdev->desc->ops->set_suspend_mode(rdev, rstate->mode);
if (ret < 0) {
- rdev_err(rdev, "failed to set mode\n");
+ rdev_err(rdev, "failed to set mode: %pe\n", ERR_PTR(ret));
return ret;
}
}
@@ -1157,8 +1159,8 @@ static int machine_constraints_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
if (current_uV < 0) {
rdev_err(rdev,
- "failed to get the current voltage(%d)\n",
- current_uV);
+ "failed to get the current voltage: %pe\n",
+ ERR_PTR(current_uV));
return current_uV;
}
@@ -1187,8 +1189,8 @@ static int machine_constraints_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
rdev, target_min, target_max);
if (ret < 0) {
rdev_err(rdev,
- "failed to apply %d-%duV constraint(%d)\n",
- target_min, target_max, ret);
+ "failed to apply %d-%duV constraint: %pe\n",
+ target_min, target_max, ERR_PTR(ret));
return ret;
}
}
@@ -1337,7 +1339,7 @@ static int set_machine_constraints(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
ret = ops->set_input_current_limit(rdev,
rdev->constraints->ilim_uA);
if (ret < 0) {
- rdev_err(rdev, "failed to set input limit\n");
+ rdev_err(rdev, "failed to set input limit: %pe\n", ERR_PTR(ret));
return ret;
}
}
@@ -1346,7 +1348,7 @@ static int set_machine_constraints(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
if (rdev->constraints->initial_state) {
ret = suspend_set_initial_state(rdev);
if (ret < 0) {
- rdev_err(rdev, "failed to set suspend state\n");
+ rdev_err(rdev, "failed to set suspend state: %pe\n", ERR_PTR(ret));
return ret;
}
}
@@ -1359,7 +1361,7 @@ static int set_machine_constraints(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
ret = ops->set_mode(rdev, rdev->constraints->initial_mode);
if (ret < 0) {
- rdev_err(rdev, "failed to set initial mode: %d\n", ret);
+ rdev_err(rdev, "failed to set initial mode: %pe\n", ERR_PTR(ret));
return ret;
}
} else if (rdev->constraints->system_load) {
@@ -1374,7 +1376,7 @@ static int set_machine_constraints(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
&& ops->set_ramp_delay) {
ret = ops->set_ramp_delay(rdev, rdev->constraints->ramp_delay);
if (ret < 0) {
- rdev_err(rdev, "failed to set ramp_delay\n");
+ rdev_err(rdev, "failed to set ramp_delay: %pe\n", ERR_PTR(ret));
return ret;
}
}
@@ -1382,7 +1384,7 @@ static int set_machine_constraints(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
if (rdev->constraints->pull_down && ops->set_pull_down) {
ret = ops->set_pull_down(rdev);
if (ret < 0) {
- rdev_err(rdev, "failed to set pull down\n");
+ rdev_err(rdev, "failed to set pull down: %pe\n", ERR_PTR(ret));
return ret;
}
}
@@ -1390,7 +1392,7 @@ static int set_machine_constraints(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
if (rdev->constraints->soft_start && ops->set_soft_start) {
ret = ops->set_soft_start(rdev);
if (ret < 0) {
- rdev_err(rdev, "failed to set soft start\n");
+ rdev_err(rdev, "failed to set soft start: %pe\n", ERR_PTR(ret));
return ret;
}
}
@@ -1399,7 +1401,8 @@ static int set_machine_constraints(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
&& ops->set_over_current_protection) {
ret = ops->set_over_current_protection(rdev);
if (ret < 0) {
- rdev_err(rdev, "failed to set over current protection\n");
+ rdev_err(rdev, "failed to set over current protection: %pe\n",
+ ERR_PTR(ret));
return ret;
}
}
@@ -1410,7 +1413,7 @@ static int set_machine_constraints(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
ret = ops->set_active_discharge(rdev, ad_state);
if (ret < 0) {
- rdev_err(rdev, "failed to set active discharge\n");
+ rdev_err(rdev, "failed to set active discharge: %pe\n", ERR_PTR(ret));
return ret;
}
}
@@ -1430,7 +1433,7 @@ static int set_machine_constraints(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
ret = _regulator_do_enable(rdev);
if (ret < 0 && ret != -EINVAL) {
- rdev_err(rdev, "failed to enable\n");
+ rdev_err(rdev, "failed to enable: %pe\n", ERR_PTR(ret));
return ret;
}
@@ -1654,8 +1657,8 @@ static struct regulator *create_regulator(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
err = sysfs_create_link_nowarn(&rdev->dev.kobj, &dev->kobj,
supply_name);
if (err) {
- rdev_dbg(rdev, "could not add device link %s err %d\n",
- dev->kobj.name, err);
+ rdev_dbg(rdev, "could not add device link %s: %pe\n",
+ dev->kobj.name, ERR_PTR(err));
/* non-fatal */
}
}
@@ -2443,7 +2446,7 @@ static int _regulator_do_enable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
if (ret >= 0) {
delay = ret;
} else {
- rdev_warn(rdev, "enable_time() failed: %d\n", ret);
+ rdev_warn(rdev, "enable_time() failed: %pe\n", ERR_PTR(ret));
delay = 0;
}
@@ -2632,7 +2635,7 @@ static int _regulator_enable(struct regulator *regulator)
_notifier_call_chain(rdev, REGULATOR_EVENT_ENABLE,
NULL);
} else if (ret < 0) {
- rdev_err(rdev, "is_enabled() failed: %d\n", ret);
+ rdev_err(rdev, "is_enabled() failed: %pe\n", ERR_PTR(ret));
goto err_consumer_disable;
}
/* Fallthrough on positive return values - already enabled */
@@ -2734,7 +2737,7 @@ static int _regulator_disable(struct regulator *regulator)
ret = _regulator_do_disable(rdev);
if (ret < 0) {
- rdev_err(rdev, "failed to disable\n");
+ rdev_err(rdev, "failed to disable: %pe\n", ERR_PTR(ret));
_notifier_call_chain(rdev,
REGULATOR_EVENT_ABORT_DISABLE,
NULL);
@@ -2801,7 +2804,7 @@ static int _regulator_force_disable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
ret = _regulator_do_disable(rdev);
if (ret < 0) {
- rdev_err(rdev, "failed to force disable\n");
+ rdev_err(rdev, "failed to force disable: %pe\n", ERR_PTR(ret));
_notifier_call_chain(rdev, REGULATOR_EVENT_FORCE_DISABLE |
REGULATOR_EVENT_ABORT_DISABLE, NULL);
return ret;
@@ -2880,7 +2883,8 @@ static void regulator_disable_work(struct work_struct *work)
for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
ret = _regulator_disable(regulator);
if (ret != 0)
- rdev_err(rdev, "Deferred disable failed: %d\n", ret);
+ rdev_err(rdev, "Deferred disable failed: %pe\n",
+ ERR_PTR(ret));
}
}
WARN_ON(!total_count);
@@ -3405,7 +3409,7 @@ static int _regulator_do_set_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
}
if (delay < 0) {
- rdev_warn(rdev, "failed to get delay: %d\n", delay);
+ rdev_warn(rdev, "failed to get delay: %pe\n", ERR_PTR(delay));
delay = 0;
}
@@ -3557,8 +3561,8 @@ int regulator_set_voltage_rdev(struct regulator_dev *rdev, int min_uV,
ret = regulator_set_voltage_unlocked(rdev->supply,
best_supply_uV, INT_MAX, state);
if (ret) {
- dev_err(&rdev->dev, "Failed to increase supply voltage: %d\n",
- ret);
+ dev_err(&rdev->dev, "Failed to increase supply voltage: %pe\n",
+ ERR_PTR(ret));
goto out;
}
}
@@ -3575,8 +3579,8 @@ int regulator_set_voltage_rdev(struct regulator_dev *rdev, int min_uV,
ret = regulator_set_voltage_unlocked(rdev->supply,
best_supply_uV, INT_MAX, state);
if (ret)
- dev_warn(&rdev->dev, "Failed to decrease supply voltage: %d\n",
- ret);
+ dev_warn(&rdev->dev, "Failed to decrease supply voltage: %pe\n",
+ ERR_PTR(ret));
/* No need to fail here */
ret = 0;
}
@@ -4562,8 +4566,8 @@ int regulator_bulk_get(struct device *dev, int num_consumers,
err:
if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
- dev_err(dev, "Failed to get supply '%s': %d\n",
- consumers[i].supply, ret);
+ dev_err(dev, "Failed to get supply '%s': %pe\n",
+ consumers[i].supply, ERR_PTR(ret));
else
dev_dbg(dev, "Failed to get supply '%s', deferring\n",
consumers[i].supply);
@@ -4621,8 +4625,8 @@ int regulator_bulk_enable(int num_consumers,
err:
for (i = 0; i < num_consumers; i++) {
if (consumers[i].ret < 0)
- pr_err("Failed to enable %s: %d\n", consumers[i].supply,
- consumers[i].ret);
+ pr_err("Failed to enable %s: %pe\n", consumers[i].supply,
+ ERR_PTR(consumers[i].ret));
else
regulator_disable(consumers[i].consumer);
}
@@ -4658,12 +4662,12 @@ int regulator_bulk_disable(int num_consumers,
return 0;
err:
- pr_err("Failed to disable %s: %d\n", consumers[i].supply, ret);
+ pr_err("Failed to disable %s: %pe\n", consumers[i].supply, ERR_PTR(ret));
for (++i; i < num_consumers; ++i) {
r = regulator_enable(consumers[i].consumer);
if (r != 0)
- pr_err("Failed to re-enable %s: %d\n",
- consumers[i].supply, r);
+ pr_err("Failed to re-enable %s: %pe\n",
+ consumers[i].supply, ERR_PTR(r));
}
return ret;
@@ -5042,8 +5046,8 @@ static void regulator_remove_coupling(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
if (coupler && coupler->detach_regulator) {
err = coupler->detach_regulator(coupler, rdev);
if (err)
- rdev_err(rdev, "failed to detach from coupler: %d\n",
- err);
+ rdev_err(rdev, "failed to detach from coupler: %pe\n",
+ ERR_PTR(err));
}
kfree(rdev->coupling_desc.coupled_rdevs);
@@ -5087,7 +5091,7 @@ static int regulator_init_coupling(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
if (IS_ERR(rdev->coupling_desc.coupler)) {
err = PTR_ERR(rdev->coupling_desc.coupler);
- rdev_err(rdev, "failed to get coupler: %d\n", err);
+ rdev_err(rdev, "failed to get coupler: %pe\n", ERR_PTR(err));
return err;
}
@@ -5250,8 +5254,8 @@ regulator_register(const struct regulator_desc *regulator_desc,
if (config->ena_gpiod) {
ret = regulator_ena_gpio_request(rdev, config);
if (ret != 0) {
- rdev_err(rdev, "Failed to request enable GPIO: %d\n",
- ret);
+ rdev_err(rdev, "Failed to request enable GPIO: %pe\n",
+ ERR_PTR(ret));
goto clean;
}
/* The regulator core took over the GPIO descriptor */
@@ -5836,7 +5840,7 @@ static int regulator_late_cleanup(struct device *dev, void *data)
rdev_info(rdev, "disabling\n");
ret = _regulator_do_disable(rdev);
if (ret != 0)
- rdev_err(rdev, "couldn't disable: %d\n", ret);
+ rdev_err(rdev, "couldn't disable: %pe\n", ERR_PTR(ret));
} else {
/* The intention is that in future we will
* assume that full constraints are provided
--
2.20.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/3] regulator: resolve supply after creating regulator
2020-09-26 21:32 [PATCH 0/3] regulator: debugging aids Michał Mirosław
2020-09-26 21:32 ` [PATCH 2/3] regulator: print symbolic errors in kernel messages Michał Mirosław
2020-09-26 21:32 ` [PATCH 1/3] regulator: print state at boot Michał Mirosław
@ 2020-09-26 21:32 ` Michał Mirosław
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Michał Mirosław @ 2020-09-26 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Liam Girdwood, Mark Brown, Jon Hunter; +Cc: linux-kernel
When creating a new regulator its supply cannot create the sysfs link
because the device is not yet published. Remove early supply resolving
since it will be done later anyway. This makes the following error
disappear and the symlinks get created instead.
DCDC_REG1: supplied by VSYS
VSYS: could not add device link regulator.3 err -2
Note: It doesn't fix the problem for bypassed regulators, though.
Fixes: 45389c47526d ("regulator: core: Add early supply resolution for regulators")
Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
---
drivers/regulator/core.c | 21 +++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index 6b56a22fd37f..607c2a76bb60 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -5279,15 +5279,20 @@ regulator_register(const struct regulator_desc *regulator_desc,
else if (regulator_desc->supply_name)
rdev->supply_name = regulator_desc->supply_name;
- /*
- * Attempt to resolve the regulator supply, if specified,
- * but don't return an error if we fail because we will try
- * to resolve it again later as more regulators are added.
- */
- if (regulator_resolve_supply(rdev))
- rdev_dbg(rdev, "unable to resolve supply\n");
-
ret = set_machine_constraints(rdev, constraints);
+ if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
+ /* Regulator might be in bypass mode and so needs its supply
+ * to set the constraints */
+ /* FIXME: this currently triggers a chicken-and-egg problem
+ * when creating -SUPPLY symlink in sysfs to a regulator
+ * that is just being created */
+ ret = regulator_resolve_supply(rdev);
+ if (!ret)
+ ret = set_machine_constraints(rdev, constraints);
+ else
+ rdev_dbg(rdev, "unable to resolve supply early: %pe\n",
+ ERR_PTR(ret));
+ }
if (ret < 0)
goto wash;
--
2.20.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-09-26 21:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-09-26 21:32 [PATCH 0/3] regulator: debugging aids Michał Mirosław
2020-09-26 21:32 ` [PATCH 2/3] regulator: print symbolic errors in kernel messages Michał Mirosław
2020-09-26 21:32 ` [PATCH 1/3] regulator: print state at boot Michał Mirosław
2020-09-26 21:32 ` [PATCH 3/3] regulator: resolve supply after creating regulator Michał Mirosław
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).