linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "lizhijian@fujitsu.com" <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	"lizhijian@fujitsu.com" <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
	"zyjzyj2000@gmail.com" <zyjzyj2000@gmail.com>,
	"aharonl@nvidia.com" <aharonl@nvidia.com>,
	"leon@kernel.org" <leon@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"mbloch@nvidia.com" <mbloch@nvidia.com>,
	"liangwenpeng@huawei.com" <liangwenpeng@huawei.com>,
	"yangx.jy@fujitsu.com" <yangx.jy@fujitsu.com>,
	"rpearsonhpe@gmail.com" <rpearsonhpe@gmail.com>,
	"y-goto@fujitsu.com" <y-goto@fujitsu.com>,
	"dan.j.williams@intel.com" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH rdma-next 01/10] RDMA: mr: Introduce is_pmem
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2022 06:12:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bf038e6c-66db-50ca-0126-3ad4ac1371e7@fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220106002130.GP6467@ziepe.ca>


Add Dan to the party :)

May i know whether there is any existing APIs to check whether
a va/page backs to a nvdimm/pmem ?



On 06/01/2022 08:21, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 04:07:08PM +0800, Li Zhijian wrote:
>> We can use it to indicate whether the registering mr is associated with
>> a pmem/nvdimm or not.
>>
>> Currently, we only assign it in rxe driver, for other device/drivers,
>> they should implement it if needed.
>>
>> RDMA FLUSH will support the persistence feature for a pmem/nvdimm.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>
>>   drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_mr.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   include/rdma/ib_verbs.h            |  1 +
>>   2 files changed, 48 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_mr.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_mr.c
>> index 7c4cd19a9db2..bcd5e7afa475 100644
>> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_mr.c
>> @@ -162,6 +162,50 @@ void rxe_mr_init_dma(struct rxe_pd *pd, int access, struct rxe_mr *mr)
>>   	mr->type = IB_MR_TYPE_DMA;
>>   }
>>   
>> +// XXX: the logic is similar with mm/memory-failure.c
>> +static bool page_in_dev_pagemap(struct page *page)
>> +{
>> +	unsigned long pfn;
>> +	struct page *p;
>> +	struct dev_pagemap *pgmap = NULL;
>> +
>> +	pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
>> +	if (!pfn) {
>> +		pr_err("no such pfn for page %p\n", page);
>> +		return false;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	p = pfn_to_online_page(pfn);
>> +	if (!p) {
>> +		if (pfn_valid(pfn)) {
>> +			pgmap = get_dev_pagemap(pfn, NULL);
>> +			if (pgmap)
>> +				put_dev_pagemap(pgmap);
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return !!pgmap;
> You need to get Dan to check this out, but I'm pretty sure this should
> be more like this:
>
> if (is_zone_device_page(page) && page->pgmap->type == MEMORY_DEVICE_FS_DAX)

Great, i have added him.



>
>
>> +static bool iova_in_pmem(struct rxe_mr *mr, u64 iova, int length)
>> +{
>> +	struct page *page = NULL;
>> +	char *vaddr = iova_to_vaddr(mr, iova, length);
>> +
>> +	if (!vaddr) {
>> +		pr_err("not a valid iova %llu\n", iova);
>> +		return false;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	page = virt_to_page(vaddr);
> And obviously this isn't uniform for the entire umem, so I don't even
> know what this is supposed to mean.

My intention is to check if a memory region belongs to a nvdimm/pmem.
The approach is like that:
iova(user space)-+                     +-> page -> page_in_dev_pagemap()
                  |                     |
                  +-> va(kernel space) -+
Since current MR's va is associated with map_set where it record the relations
between iova and va and page. Do do you mean we should travel map_set to
get its page ? or by any other ways.

  





>> diff --git a/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h b/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
>> index 6e9ad656ecb7..822ebb3425dc 100644
>> +++ b/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
>> @@ -1807,6 +1807,7 @@ struct ib_mr {
>>   	unsigned int	   page_size;
>>   	enum ib_mr_type	   type;
>>   	bool		   need_inval;
>> +	bool		   is_pmem;
> Or why it is being stored in the global struct?

Indeed, it's not strong necessary. but i think is_pmem should belongs to a ib_mr
so that it can be checked by other general code when they needed even though no
one does such checking so far.


Thanks
Zhijian



>
> Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-06  6:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-28  8:07 [RFC PATCH rdma-next 00/10] RDMA/rxe: Add RDMA FLUSH operation Li Zhijian
2021-12-28  8:07 ` [RFC PATCH rdma-next 01/10] RDMA: mr: Introduce is_pmem Li Zhijian
2022-01-06  0:21   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-01-06  6:12     ` lizhijian [this message]
2022-01-14  8:10       ` Li, Zhijian
2022-01-27 22:30         ` Jeff Moyer
2022-01-16 18:11       ` Dan Williams
2022-01-18  8:55         ` lizhijian
2022-01-18 15:28           ` Dan Williams
2022-01-19  2:01             ` lizhijian
2021-12-28  8:07 ` [RFC PATCH rdma-next 02/10] RDMA: Allow registering MR with flush access flags Li Zhijian
2021-12-28  8:07 ` [RFC PATCH rdma-next 03/10] RDMA/rxe: Allow registering FLUSH flags for supported device only Li Zhijian
2022-01-06  0:22   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-01-06  6:20     ` lizhijian
2022-01-13  6:43   ` lizhijian
2021-12-28  8:07 ` [RFC PATCH rdma-next 04/10] RDMA/rxe: Enable IB_DEVICE_RDMA_FLUSH for rxe device Li Zhijian
2022-01-06  0:22   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-01-06  6:26     ` lizhijian
2021-12-28  8:07 ` [RFC PATCH rdma-next 05/10] RDMA/rxe: Allow registering persistent flag for pmem MR only Li Zhijian
2021-12-30 22:25   ` Tom Talpey
2021-12-31  3:34     ` lizhijian
2021-12-31 14:40       ` Tom Talpey
2022-01-04  1:32         ` lizhijian
2021-12-28  8:07 ` [RFC PATCH rdma-next 06/10] RDMA/rxe: Implement RC RDMA FLUSH service in requester side Li Zhijian
2021-12-28  8:07 ` [RFC PATCH rdma-next 07/10] RDMA/rxe: Set BTH's SE to zero for FLUSH packet Li Zhijian
2021-12-28  8:07 ` [RFC PATCH rdma-next 08/10] RDMA/rxe: Implement flush execution in responder side Li Zhijian
2021-12-30 22:18   ` Tom Talpey
2021-12-31  1:37     ` lizhijian
2021-12-31  2:32       ` Tom Talpey
2022-01-04  8:51         ` lizhijian
2022-01-04 16:02           ` Tom Talpey
2022-01-06  0:35         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-01-04 16:40   ` Tom Talpey
2022-01-05  1:43     ` lizhijian
2022-01-06  0:28   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-01-06  6:42     ` lizhijian
2022-01-06 17:33       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-01-10  5:45         ` lizhijian
2022-01-10 14:34           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-01-11  5:34             ` lizhijian
2022-01-11 20:48               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-01-12  9:50                 ` lizhijian
2022-01-12 13:12                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-01-13  6:29                     ` lizhijian
2021-12-28  8:07 ` [RFC PATCH rdma-next 09/10] RDMA/rxe: Implement flush completion Li Zhijian
2021-12-28  8:07 ` [RFC PATCH rdma-next 10/10] RDMA/rxe: Add RD FLUSH service support Li Zhijian
2021-12-29  8:49 ` [RFC PATCH rdma-next 00/10] RDMA/rxe: Add RDMA FLUSH operation Gromadzki, Tomasz
2021-12-29 14:35   ` Tom Talpey
2021-12-31  1:10     ` lizhijian

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bf038e6c-66db-50ca-0126-3ad4ac1371e7@fujitsu.com \
    --to=lizhijian@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=aharonl@nvidia.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=liangwenpeng@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mbloch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=rpearsonhpe@gmail.com \
    --cc=y-goto@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=yangx.jy@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=zyjzyj2000@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).