Re: [RFC PATCH rdma-next 01/10] RDMA: mr: Introduce is_pmem

["lizhijian@fujitsu.com" <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>]

On 18/01/2022 23:28, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 12:55 AM lizhijian@fujitsu.com
> <lizhijian@fujitsu.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 17/01/2022 02:11, Dan Williams wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 10:13 PM lizhijian@fujitsu.com
>>> <lizhijian@fujitsu.com> wrote:
>>>> Add Dan to the party :)
>>>>
>>>> May i know whether there is any existing APIs to check whether
>>>> a va/page backs to a nvdimm/pmem ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 06/01/2022 08:21, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 04:07:08PM +0800, Li Zhijian wrote:
>>>>>> We can use it to indicate whether the registering mr is associated with
>>>>>> a pmem/nvdimm or not.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Currently, we only assign it in rxe driver, for other device/drivers,
>>>>>> they should implement it if needed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> RDMA FLUSH will support the persistence feature for a pmem/nvdimm.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>
>>>>>>     drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_mr.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>     include/rdma/ib_verbs.h            |  1 +
>>>>>>     2 files changed, 48 insertions(+)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_mr.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_mr.c
>>>>>> index 7c4cd19a9db2..bcd5e7afa475 100644
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_mr.c
>>>>>> @@ -162,6 +162,50 @@ void rxe_mr_init_dma(struct rxe_pd *pd, int access, struct rxe_mr *mr)
>>>>>>        mr->type = IB_MR_TYPE_DMA;
>>>>>>     }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +// XXX: the logic is similar with mm/memory-failure.c
>>>>>> +static bool page_in_dev_pagemap(struct page *page)
>>>>>> +{
>>>>>> +    unsigned long pfn;
>>>>>> +    struct page *p;
>>>>>> +    struct dev_pagemap *pgmap = NULL;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +    pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
>>>>>> +    if (!pfn) {
>>>>>> +            pr_err("no such pfn for page %p\n", page);
>>>>>> +            return false;
>>>>>> +    }
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +    p = pfn_to_online_page(pfn);
>>>>>> +    if (!p) {
>>>>>> +            if (pfn_valid(pfn)) {
>>>>>> +                    pgmap = get_dev_pagemap(pfn, NULL);
>>>>>> +                    if (pgmap)
>>>>>> +                            put_dev_pagemap(pgmap);
>>>>>> +            }
>>>>>> +    }
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +    return !!pgmap;
>>>>> You need to get Dan to check this out, but I'm pretty sure this should
>>>>> be more like this:
>>>>>
>>>>> if (is_zone_device_page(page) && page->pgmap->type == MEMORY_DEVICE_FS_DAX)
>>>> Great, i have added him.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> +static bool iova_in_pmem(struct rxe_mr *mr, u64 iova, int length)
>>>>>> +{
>>>>>> +    struct page *page = NULL;
>>>>>> +    char *vaddr = iova_to_vaddr(mr, iova, length);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +    if (!vaddr) {
>>>>>> +            pr_err("not a valid iova %llu\n", iova);
>>>>>> +            return false;
>>>>>> +    }
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +    page = virt_to_page(vaddr);
>>>>> And obviously this isn't uniform for the entire umem, so I don't even
>>>>> know what this is supposed to mean.
>>>> My intention is to check if a memory region belongs to a nvdimm/pmem.
>>>> The approach is like that:
>>>> iova(user space)-+                     +-> page -> page_in_dev_pagemap()
>>>>                     |                     |
>>>>                     +-> va(kernel space) -+
>>>> Since current MR's va is associated with map_set where it record the relations
>>>> between iova and va and page. Do do you mean we should travel map_set to
>>>> get its page ? or by any other ways.
>>> Apologies for the delay in responding.
>>>
>>> The Subject line of this patch is confusing, if you want to know if a
>>> pfn is in persistent memory the only mechanism for that is:
>>>
>>> region_intersects(addr, length, IORESOURCE_MEM, IORES_DESC_PERSISTENT_MEMORY)
>>>
>>> ...there is otherwise nothing pmem specific about the dev_pagemap
>>> infrastructure. Yes, pmem is the primary user, but it is also used for
>>> mapping "soft-reserved" memory (See: the EFI_MEMORY_SP) attribute, and
>>> other users.
>>>
>>> Can you clarify the intent? I am missing some context.
>> thanks for your help @Dan
>>
>> I'm going to implement a new ibvers called RDMA FLUSH, it will support global visibility
>> and persistence placement type.
>>
>> In my first design, only pmem can support persistence placement type, so i need to introduce
>> new attribute is_pmem to RDMA memory region where it associates to a user space address iova
>> so that i can reject a persistence placement type to DRAM(non-pmem).
> Ok, I think for that case you are better served using the
> IORES_DESC_PERSISTENT_MEMORY designation as the gate for attempting
> the flush. The dev_pagemap is otherwise only indicating the presence
> of device-backed memory pages, not persistence.

Thanks a million for your kindly suggestion.

Thanks
Zhijian