[PATCH] uml: fix W=1 missing-include-dirs warnings

[PATCH] uml: fix W=1 missing-include-dirs warnings

[Randy Dunlap]

Currently when using "W=1" with UML builds, there are over 700 warnings
like so:

  CC      arch/um/drivers/stderr_console.o
cc1: warning: ./arch/um/include/uapi: No such file or directory [-Wmissing-include-dirs]

but arch/um/ does not have include/uapi/ at all, so don't
include arch/um/include/uapi/ in USERINCLUDE for UML.

Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Cc: Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>
Cc: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>
Cc: linux-um@lists.infradead.org
---
 Makefile |   10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

Option 2: change the setting of USERINCLUDE. This could alter
	(a) build times and
	(b) which header files get used: if there are multiple
	    header files named foobar.h in the $(USERINCLUDE)
	    subdirectories, this Option changes the order in which
	    they would be found.

- linux-next-20210413.orig/Makefile
+ linux-next-20210413/Makefile
@@ -501,13 +501,16 @@ LDFLAGS_vmlinux =
 
 # Use USERINCLUDE when you must reference the UAPI directories only.
 USERINCLUDE    := \
-		-I$(srctree)/arch/$(SRCARCH)/include/uapi \
 		-I$(objtree)/arch/$(SRCARCH)/include/generated/uapi \
 		-I$(srctree)/include/uapi \
 		-I$(objtree)/include/generated/uapi \
                 -include $(srctree)/include/linux/compiler-version.h \
                 -include $(srctree)/include/linux/kconfig.h
 
+ifneq ($(ARCH),um)
+USERINCLUDE    += -I$(srctree)/arch/$(SRCARCH)/include/uapi
+endif
+
 # Use LINUXINCLUDE when you must reference the include/ directory.
 # Needed to be compatible with the O= option
 LINUXINCLUDE    := \

Option 3: modify scripts/Makefile.extrawarn not to set
	-Wmissing-include-dirs for arch=um. I think that this is not
	a good idea: it could cause valid problem reports not to be
	reported.

Option 4: simply mkdir arch/um/include/uapi
	That's what I did first, just as a test, and it works.

--- linux-next-20210413.orig/Makefile
+++ linux-next-20210413/Makefile
@@ -500,6 +500,15 @@ AFLAGS_KERNEL	=
 LDFLAGS_vmlinux =
 
 # Use USERINCLUDE when you must reference the UAPI directories only.
+# Note: arch/um/ does not have an include/uapi/ subdir.
+ifeq ($(ARCH),um)
+USERINCLUDE    := \
+		-I$(objtree)/arch/$(SRCARCH)/include/generated/uapi \
+		-I$(srctree)/include/uapi \
+		-I$(objtree)/include/generated/uapi \
+                -include $(srctree)/include/linux/compiler-version.h \
+                -include $(srctree)/include/linux/kconfig.h
+else
 USERINCLUDE    := \
 		-I$(srctree)/arch/$(SRCARCH)/include/uapi \
 		-I$(objtree)/arch/$(SRCARCH)/include/generated/uapi \
@@ -507,6 +516,7 @@ USERINCLUDE    := \
 		-I$(objtree)/include/generated/uapi \
                 -include $(srctree)/include/linux/compiler-version.h \
                 -include $(srctree)/include/linux/kconfig.h
+endif
 
 # Use LINUXINCLUDE when you must reference the include/ directory.
 # Needed to be compatible with the O= option

Re: [PATCH] uml: fix W=1 missing-include-dirs warnings

[Masahiro Yamada]

On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 4:27 AM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> Currently when using "W=1" with UML builds, there are over 700 warnings
> like so:
>
>   CC      arch/um/drivers/stderr_console.o
> cc1: warning: ./arch/um/include/uapi: No such file or directory [-Wmissing-include-dirs]
>
> but arch/um/ does not have include/uapi/ at all, so don't
> include arch/um/include/uapi/ in USERINCLUDE for UML.
>
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
> Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
> Cc: Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>
> Cc: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
> Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
> Cc: Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>
> Cc: linux-um@lists.infradead.org
> ---
>  Makefile |   10 ++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> Option 2: change the setting of USERINCLUDE. This could alter
>         (a) build times and
>         (b) which header files get used: if there are multiple
>             header files named foobar.h in the $(USERINCLUDE)
>             subdirectories, this Option changes the order in which
>             they would be found.
>
> - linux-next-20210413.orig/Makefile
> + linux-next-20210413/Makefile
> @@ -501,13 +501,16 @@ LDFLAGS_vmlinux =
>
>  # Use USERINCLUDE when you must reference the UAPI directories only.
>  USERINCLUDE    := \
> -               -I$(srctree)/arch/$(SRCARCH)/include/uapi \
>                 -I$(objtree)/arch/$(SRCARCH)/include/generated/uapi \
>                 -I$(srctree)/include/uapi \
>                 -I$(objtree)/include/generated/uapi \
>                  -include $(srctree)/include/linux/compiler-version.h \
>                  -include $(srctree)/include/linux/kconfig.h
>
> +ifneq ($(ARCH),um)
> +USERINCLUDE    += -I$(srctree)/arch/$(SRCARCH)/include/uapi
> +endif
> +
>  # Use LINUXINCLUDE when you must reference the include/ directory.
>  # Needed to be compatible with the O= option
>  LINUXINCLUDE    := \
>
> Option 3: modify scripts/Makefile.extrawarn not to set
>         -Wmissing-include-dirs for arch=um. I think that this is not
>         a good idea: it could cause valid problem reports not to be
>         reported.
>
> Option 4: simply mkdir arch/um/include/uapi
>         That's what I did first, just as a test, and it works.


I like Option 4.

But, you cannot do "mkdir -p arch/um/include/uapi" at build-time
because the build system should not touch the source tree(, which
might be read-only)
for O= building.

How about adding

  arch/um/include/uapi/asm/Kbuild,

which is just having a SPDX one-liner?












>
> --- linux-next-20210413.orig/Makefile
> +++ linux-next-20210413/Makefile
> @@ -500,6 +500,15 @@ AFLAGS_KERNEL      =
>  LDFLAGS_vmlinux =
>
>  # Use USERINCLUDE when you must reference the UAPI directories only.
> +# Note: arch/um/ does not have an include/uapi/ subdir.
> +ifeq ($(ARCH),um)
> +USERINCLUDE    := \
> +               -I$(objtree)/arch/$(SRCARCH)/include/generated/uapi \
> +               -I$(srctree)/include/uapi \
> +               -I$(objtree)/include/generated/uapi \
> +                -include $(srctree)/include/linux/compiler-version.h \
> +                -include $(srctree)/include/linux/kconfig.h
> +else
>  USERINCLUDE    := \
>                 -I$(srctree)/arch/$(SRCARCH)/include/uapi \
>                 -I$(objtree)/arch/$(SRCARCH)/include/generated/uapi \
> @@ -507,6 +516,7 @@ USERINCLUDE    := \
>                 -I$(objtree)/include/generated/uapi \
>                  -include $(srctree)/include/linux/compiler-version.h \
>                  -include $(srctree)/include/linux/kconfig.h
> +endif
>
>  # Use LINUXINCLUDE when you must reference the include/ directory.
>  # Needed to be compatible with the O= option



-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

Re: [PATCH] uml: fix W=1 missing-include-dirs warnings

[Randy Dunlap]

On 4/14/21 11:52 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 4:27 AM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote:
>>
>> Currently when using "W=1" with UML builds, there are over 700 warnings
>> like so:
>>
>>   CC      arch/um/drivers/stderr_console.o
>> cc1: warning: ./arch/um/include/uapi: No such file or directory [-Wmissing-include-dirs]
>>
>> but arch/um/ does not have include/uapi/ at all, so don't
>> include arch/um/include/uapi/ in USERINCLUDE for UML.


>> Option 4: simply mkdir arch/um/include/uapi
>>         That's what I did first, just as a test, and it works.
> 
> 
> I like Option 4.
> 
> But, you cannot do "mkdir -p arch/um/include/uapi" at build-time
> because the build system should not touch the source tree(, which
> might be read-only)
> for O= building.
> 
> How about adding
> 
>   arch/um/include/uapi/asm/Kbuild,
> 
> which is just having a SPDX one-liner?

Wow!  :)
That's what Al Viro suggested also.
I'll submit that patch later today (Thursday my time).

thanks.
-- 
~Randy

Re: [PATCH] uml: fix W=1 missing-include-dirs warnings

[Masahiro Yamada]

On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 4:02 PM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> On 4/14/21 11:52 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 4:27 AM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Currently when using "W=1" with UML builds, there are over 700 warnings
> >> like so:
> >>
> >>   CC      arch/um/drivers/stderr_console.o
> >> cc1: warning: ./arch/um/include/uapi: No such file or directory [-Wmissing-include-dirs]
> >>
> >> but arch/um/ does not have include/uapi/ at all, so don't
> >> include arch/um/include/uapi/ in USERINCLUDE for UML.
>
>
> >> Option 4: simply mkdir arch/um/include/uapi
> >>         That's what I did first, just as a test, and it works.
> >
> >
> > I like Option 4.
> >
> > But, you cannot do "mkdir -p arch/um/include/uapi" at build-time
> > because the build system should not touch the source tree(, which
> > might be read-only)
> > for O= building.
> >
> > How about adding
> >
> >   arch/um/include/uapi/asm/Kbuild,
> >
> > which is just having a SPDX one-liner?
>
> Wow!  :)
> That's what Al Viro suggested also.
> I'll submit that patch later today (Thursday my time).
>
> thanks.
> --
> ~Randy
>


BTW, after fixing this UML problem,
can we move -Wmissing-include-dirs to the top Makefile?

Is there any other source of -Wmissing-include-dirs
warnings?





-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

Re: [PATCH] uml: fix W=1 missing-include-dirs warnings

[Randy Dunlap]

On 4/15/21 12:04 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 4:02 PM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 4/14/21 11:52 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 4:27 AM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Currently when using "W=1" with UML builds, there are over 700 warnings
>>>> like so:
>>>>
>>>>   CC      arch/um/drivers/stderr_console.o
>>>> cc1: warning: ./arch/um/include/uapi: No such file or directory [-Wmissing-include-dirs]
>>>>
>>>> but arch/um/ does not have include/uapi/ at all, so don't
>>>> include arch/um/include/uapi/ in USERINCLUDE for UML.
>>
>>
>>>> Option 4: simply mkdir arch/um/include/uapi
>>>>         That's what I did first, just as a test, and it works.
>>>
>>>
>>> I like Option 4.
>>>
>>> But, you cannot do "mkdir -p arch/um/include/uapi" at build-time
>>> because the build system should not touch the source tree(, which
>>> might be read-only)
>>> for O= building.
>>>
>>> How about adding
>>>
>>>   arch/um/include/uapi/asm/Kbuild,
>>>
>>> which is just having a SPDX one-liner?
>>
>> Wow!  :)
>> That's what Al Viro suggested also.
>> I'll submit that patch later today (Thursday my time).
>>
>> thanks.
>> --
>> ~Randy
>>
> 
> 
> BTW, after fixing this UML problem,
> can we move -Wmissing-include-dirs to the top Makefile?

I don't see why not. And eventually remove this one:

fs/btrfs/Makefile:subdir-ccflags-y += -Wmissing-include-dirs

> Is there any other source of -Wmissing-include-dirs
> warnings?

I can't give a full answer on that; only that I haven't
seen any others and also that all other arch/*/include/
do have a uapi/ subdir.

-- 
~Randy