linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
To: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>, <x86@kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	H Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>, Babu Moger <Babu.Moger@amd.com>,
	<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>,
	Jamie Iles <jamie@nuviainc.com>,
	"D Scott Phillips OS" <scott@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	<lcherian@marvell.com>, <bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com>,
	<tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 12/21] x86/resctrl: Calculate bandwidth from the previous __mon_event_count() chunks
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2022 16:27:00 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c4088205-a344-5ef8-15e2-9ccc5d1691ea@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220217182110.7176-13-james.morse@arm.com>

Hi James,

On 2/17/2022 10:21 AM, James Morse wrote:
> mbm_bw_count() is only called by the mbm_handle_overflow() worker once a
> second. It reads the hardware register, calculates the bandwidth and
> updates m->prev_bw_msr which is used to hold the previous hardware register
> value.
> 
> Operating directly on hardware register values makes it difficult to make
> this code architecture independent, so that it can be moved to /fs/,
> making the mba_sc feature something resctrl supports with no additional
> support from the architecture.
> Prior to calling mbm_bw_count(), mbm_update() reads from the same hardware
> register using __mon_event_count().
> 
> Change mbm_bw_count() to use the current chunks value most recently saved by
> __mon_event_count(). This removes an extra call to __rmid_read().

> Instead of using m->prev_msr to calculate the number of chunks seen,
> use the rr->val that was updated by __mon_event_count(). This removes a extra
> calls to mbm_overflow_count() and get_corrected_mbm_count().

"removes a extra calls" -> "removes an extra call" ?

__mon_event_count() ends with "rr->val += get_corrected_mbm_count()" and
it is called twice by mbm_update(). The intention in this change is for
mbm_bw_count() to benefit from the rmid read done just before ...
but would using rr->val within mbm_bw_count() not result in it getting
data from both rmid reads due to the increment?

mbm_update() {

	rr.val = 0;

	if (is_mbm_total_enabled()) {
		...
		__mon_event_count() /* rr->val += ... */
	}
	if (is_mbm_local_enabled()) {
		...
		__mon_event_count() /* rr->val += ... */

		if (is_mba_sc(NULL))
			mbm_bw_count(rmid, &rr); /* Use rr-> val */
	}


Should rr.val perhaps be reset before each __mon_event_count() call instead of
just at the beginning of mbm_update()?

> Calculating bandwidth like this means mbm_bw_count() no longer operates
> on hardware register values directly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> ---
> Changes since v2:
>  * Expanded commit message
> 
> Changes since v1:
>  * This patch was rewritten
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h |  4 ++--
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c  | 24 +++++++++++++++---------
>  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> index 3b9e43ba7590..c50c8911ef59 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> @@ -289,7 +289,7 @@ struct rftype {
>   * struct mbm_state - status for each MBM counter in each domain
>   * @chunks:	Total data moved (multiply by rdt_group.mon_scale to get bytes)
>   * @prev_msr:	Value of IA32_QM_CTR for this RMID last time we read it
> - * @prev_bw_msr:Value of previous IA32_QM_CTR for bandwidth counting
> + * @prev_bw_chunks: Previous chunks value read when for bandwidth calculation

"value read when for" -> "value read for"?

>   * @prev_bw:	The most recent bandwidth in MBps
>   * @delta_bw:	Difference between the current and previous bandwidth
>   * @delta_comp:	Indicates whether to compute the delta_bw
> @@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ struct rftype {
>  struct mbm_state {
>  	u64	chunks;
>  	u64	prev_msr;
> -	u64	prev_bw_msr;
> +	u64	prev_bw_chunks;
>  	u32	prev_bw;
>  	u32	delta_bw;
>  	bool	delta_comp;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
> index ac1a2e8998bb..8ae375e29256 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
> @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ static u64 __mon_event_count(u32 rmid, struct rmid_read *rr)
>  
>  	if (rr->first) {
>  		memset(m, 0, sizeof(struct mbm_state));
> -		m->prev_bw_msr = m->prev_msr = tval;
> +		m->prev_msr = tval;
>  		return 0;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -329,27 +329,32 @@ static u64 __mon_event_count(u32 rmid, struct rmid_read *rr)
>  }
>  
>  /*
> + * mbm_bw_count() - Update bw count from values previously read by
> + *		    __mon_event_count().
> + * @rmid:	The rmid used to identify the cached mbm_state.
> + * @rr:		The struct rmid_read populated by __mon_event_count().
> + *
>   * Supporting function to calculate the memory bandwidth
> - * and delta bandwidth in MBps.
> + * and delta bandwidth in MBps. The chunks value previously read by
> + * __mon_event_count() is compared with the chunks value from the previous
> + * invocation. This must be called oncer per second to maintain values in MBps.

"must be called oncer" -> "must be called once"

>   */
>  static void mbm_bw_count(u32 rmid, struct rmid_read *rr)
>  {
>  	struct rdt_hw_resource *hw_res = resctrl_to_arch_res(rr->r);
>  	struct mbm_state *m = &rr->d->mbm_local[rmid];
> -	u64 tval, cur_bw, chunks;
> +	u64 cur_bw, chunks, cur_chunks;
>  
> -	tval = __rmid_read(rmid, rr->evtid);
> -	if (tval & (RMID_VAL_ERROR | RMID_VAL_UNAVAIL))
> -		return;
> +	cur_chunks = rr->val;
> +	chunks = cur_chunks - m->prev_bw_chunks;
> +	m->prev_bw_chunks = cur_chunks;
>  
> -	chunks = mbm_overflow_count(m->prev_bw_msr, tval, hw_res->mbm_width);
> -	cur_bw = (get_corrected_mbm_count(rmid, chunks) * hw_res->mon_scale) >> 20;
> +	cur_bw = (chunks * hw_res->mon_scale) >> 20;
>  
>  	if (m->delta_comp)
>  		m->delta_bw = abs(cur_bw - m->prev_bw);
>  	m->delta_comp = false;
>  	m->prev_bw = cur_bw;
> -	m->prev_bw_msr = tval;
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -509,6 +514,7 @@ static void mbm_update(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_domain *d, int rmid)
>  	rr.first = false;
>  	rr.r = r;
>  	rr.d = d;
> +	rr.val = 0;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * This is protected from concurrent reads from user

Reinette

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-05  0:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-17 18:20 [PATCH v3 00/21] x86/resctrl: Make resctrl_arch_rmid_read() return values in bytes James Morse
2022-02-17 18:20 ` [PATCH v3 01/21] x86/resctrl: Kill off alloc_enabled James Morse
2022-03-16 21:48   ` Reinette Chatre
2022-02-17 18:20 ` [PATCH v3 02/21] x86/resctrl: Merge mon_capable and mon_enabled James Morse
2022-02-17 18:20 ` [PATCH v3 03/21] x86/resctrl: Add domain online callback for resctrl work James Morse
2022-02-17 18:20 ` [PATCH v3 04/21] x86/resctrl: Group struct rdt_hw_domain cleanup James Morse
2022-02-17 18:20 ` [PATCH v3 05/21] x86/resctrl: Add domain offline callback for resctrl work James Morse
2022-02-17 18:20 ` [PATCH v3 06/21] x86/resctrl: Remove set_mba_sc()s control array re-initialisation James Morse
2022-02-17 18:20 ` [PATCH v3 07/21] x86/resctrl: Create mba_sc configuration in the rdt_domain James Morse
2022-03-05  0:26   ` Reinette Chatre
2022-03-30 16:43     ` James Morse
2022-03-16 21:50   ` Reinette Chatre
2022-03-30 16:43     ` James Morse
2022-04-01 22:54       ` Reinette Chatre
2022-04-04 16:35         ` James Morse
2022-04-04 20:43           ` Reinette Chatre
2022-02-17 18:20 ` [PATCH v3 08/21] x86/resctrl: Switch over to the resctrl mbps_val list James Morse
2022-02-17 18:20 ` [PATCH v3 09/21] x86/resctrl: Remove architecture copy of mbps_val James Morse
2022-02-17 18:20 ` [PATCH v3 10/21] x86/resctrl: Abstract and use supports_mba_mbps() James Morse
2022-02-17 18:21 ` [PATCH v3 11/21] x86/resctrl: Allow update_mba_bw() to update controls directly James Morse
2022-02-17 18:21 ` [PATCH v3 12/21] x86/resctrl: Calculate bandwidth from the previous __mon_event_count() chunks James Morse
2022-03-05  0:27   ` Reinette Chatre [this message]
2022-03-30 16:44     ` James Morse
2022-02-17 18:21 ` [PATCH v3 13/21] x86/recstrl: Add per-rmid arch private storage for overflow and chunks James Morse
2022-03-16 21:50   ` Reinette Chatre
2022-02-17 18:21 ` [PATCH v3 14/21] x86/recstrl: Allow per-rmid arch private storage to be reset James Morse
2022-03-16 21:50   ` Reinette Chatre
2022-02-17 18:21 ` [PATCH v3 15/21] x86/resctrl: Abstract __rmid_read() James Morse
2022-03-16 21:52   ` Reinette Chatre
2022-03-30 16:44     ` James Morse
2022-02-17 18:21 ` [PATCH v3 16/21] x86/resctrl: Pass the required parameters into resctrl_arch_rmid_read() James Morse
2022-03-23 20:58   ` Rob Herring
2022-03-30 16:45     ` James Morse
2022-02-17 18:21 ` [PATCH v3 17/21] x86/resctrl: Move mbm_overflow_count() " James Morse
2022-02-17 18:21 ` [PATCH v3 18/21] x86/resctrl: Move get_corrected_mbm_count() " James Morse
2022-02-17 18:21 ` [PATCH v3 19/21] x86/resctrl: Rename and change the units of resctrl_cqm_threshold James Morse
2022-03-17 17:00   ` Reinette Chatre
2022-03-30 16:45     ` James Morse
2022-04-01 22:55       ` Reinette Chatre
2022-02-17 18:21 ` [PATCH v3 20/21] x86/resctrl: Add resctrl_rmid_realloc_limit to abstract x86's boot_cpu_data James Morse
2022-02-17 18:21 ` [PATCH v3 21/21] x86/resctrl: Make resctrl_arch_rmid_read() return values in bytes James Morse
2022-03-23 21:17   ` Rob Herring
2022-04-04 16:36     ` James Morse
2022-03-07 12:56 ` [PATCH v3 00/21] " Jamie Iles
2022-04-04 16:36   ` James Morse
2022-03-15  6:41 ` Xin Hao
2022-04-04 16:36   ` James Morse
2022-03-15  8:16 ` tan.shaopeng
2022-04-04 16:35   ` James Morse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c4088205-a344-5ef8-15e2-9ccc5d1691ea@intel.com \
    --to=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=Babu.Moger@amd.com \
    --cc=bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jamie@nuviainc.com \
    --cc=lcherian@marvell.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=scott@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
    --cc=tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).