From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] blkcg: allocate struct blkcg_gq outside request queue spinlock
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 08:32:56 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c514c076-18ea-8605-d439-e46730aa29e0@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAeU0aN6615BUP+ikqZeTm1=BSEN48uDu3Ucz8o9QrmETnkHSA@mail.gmail.com>
On 03/11/2017 09:35 PM, Tahsin Erdogan wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
>
>>
>> Talked to Tejun about this as well, and we both agree that the splitting
>> this into separate init/alloc paths would be much cleaner. I can't
>> apply the current patch, sorry, it's just too ugly to live.
>
> Do you mean, you prefer the approach that was taken in v1 patch or
> something else?
I can no longer find v1 of the patch, just v2 and on. Can you send a
link to it?
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-13 14:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-28 2:49 [PATCH] blkcg: allocate struct blkcg_gq outside request queue spinlock Tahsin Erdogan
2017-02-28 22:47 ` Tejun Heo
2017-02-28 23:51 ` Tahsin Erdogan
2017-03-01 16:55 ` Tejun Heo
2017-03-01 23:43 ` [PATCH v2] " Tahsin Erdogan
2017-03-01 23:49 ` Tahsin Erdogan
2017-03-02 19:32 ` Tejun Heo
2017-03-02 22:33 ` Tahsin Erdogan
2017-03-03 19:23 ` Tejun Heo
2017-03-04 1:40 ` [PATCH v3] " Tahsin Erdogan
2017-03-04 19:23 ` Tejun Heo
2017-03-05 14:12 ` [PATCH v4] " Tahsin Erdogan
2017-03-05 14:24 ` Tahsin Erdogan
2017-03-06 20:03 ` Tejun Heo
2017-03-09 8:05 ` [PATCH v5] " Tahsin Erdogan
2017-03-09 18:27 ` Tejun Heo
2017-03-11 22:42 ` Jens Axboe
2017-03-11 22:52 ` Jens Axboe
2017-03-12 4:35 ` Tahsin Erdogan
2017-03-13 14:32 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2017-03-13 16:17 ` Tahsin Erdogan
2017-03-24 21:56 ` [PATCH] " Tahsin Erdogan
2017-03-24 22:04 ` Jens Axboe
2017-03-28 21:53 ` Tejun Heo
2017-03-28 21:59 ` [PATCH v5] " Jens Axboe
2017-03-28 22:01 ` Tahsin Erdogan
2017-03-09 5:25 ` [lkp-robot] [blkcg] ad63af3cb7: BUG:sleeping_function_called_from_invalid_context_at_mm/slab.h kernel test robot
2017-03-09 7:59 ` Tahsin Erdogan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c514c076-18ea-8605-d439-e46730aa29e0@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=tahsin@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).