From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>, Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix quota info to adjust recovered data
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 09:38:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c60b6e64-04ce-ec7c-24d8-82273e65b5b9@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180918011904.GB79604@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com>
On 2018/9/18 9:19, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 09/13, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2018/9/13 3:54, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>> On 09/12, Chao Yu wrote:
>>>> On 2018/9/12 9:40, Chao Yu wrote:
>>>>> On 2018/9/12 9:25, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>>>>> On 09/12, Chao Yu wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2018/9/12 8:27, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 09/11, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 09/12, Chao Yu wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 2018/9/12 4:15, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> fsck.f2fs is able to recover the quota structure, since roll-forward recovery
>>>>>>>>>>> can recover it based on previous user information.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I didn't get it, both fsck and kernel recover quota file based all inodes'
>>>>>>>>>> uid/gid/prjid, if {x}id didn't change, wouldn't those two recovery result be the
>>>>>>>>>> same?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I thought that, but had to add this, since I was encountering quota errors right
>>>>>>>>> after getting some files recovered. And, I thought it'd make it more safe to do
>>>>>>>>> fsck after roll-forward recovery.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Anyway, let me test again without this patch for a while.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hmm, I just got a fsck failure right after some files recovered.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To make sure, do you test with "f2fs: guarantee journalled quota data by
>>>>>>> checkpoint"? if not, I think there is no guarantee that f2fs can recover
>>>>>>> quote info into correct quote file, because, in last checkpoint, quota file
>>>>>>> may was corrupted/inconsistent. Right?
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh, I forget to mention that, I add a patch to fsck to let it noticing
>>>>> CP_QUOTA_NEED_FSCK_FLAG flag, and by default, fsck will fix corrupted quote
>>>>> file if the flag is set, but w/o this flag, quota file is still corrupted
>>>>> detected by fsck, I guess there is bug in v8.
>>>>
>>>> In v8, there are two cases we didn't guarantee quota file's consistence:
>>>> 1. flush time in block_operation exceed a threshold.
>>>> 2. dquot subsystem error occurs.
>>>>
>>>> For above case, fsck should repair the quota file by default.
>>>
>>> Okay, I got another failure and it seems CP_QUOTA_NEED_FSCK_FLAG was not set
>>> during the recovery. So, we have something missing in the recovery in terms
>>> of quota updates.
>>
>> Yeah, I checked the code, just found one suspected place:
>>
>> find_fsync_dnodes()
>> - f2fs_recover_inode_page
>> - inc_valid_node_count
>> - dquot_reserve_block dquot info is not initialized now
>> - add_fsync_inode
>> - dquot_initialize
>>
>> I think we should reserve block for inode block after dquot_initialize(), can
>> you confirm this?
>
> Let me test this.
>
>>From b90260bc577fe87570b1ef7b134554a8295b1f6c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2018 18:14:41 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: count inode block for recovered files
>
> If a new file is recovered, we missed to reserve its inode block.
I remember, in order to keep line with other filesystem, unlike on-disk, we
have to keep backward compatibilty, in memory we don't account block number
for f2fs' inode block, but only account inode number for it, so here like
we did in inc_valid_node_count(), we don't need to do this.
Can you test v9 first? I didn't encounter quota corruption with your
testcase right now. Will check it in cell phone environment.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/recovery.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
> index 56d34193a74b..bff5cf730e13 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
> @@ -84,6 +84,11 @@ static struct fsync_inode_entry *add_fsync_inode(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> err = dquot_alloc_inode(inode);
> if (err)
> goto err_out;
> + err = dquot_reserve_block(inode, 1);
> + if (err) {
> + dquot_drop(inode);
> + goto err_out;
> + }
> }
>
> entry = f2fs_kmem_cache_alloc(fsync_entry_slab, GFP_F2FS_ZERO);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-18 1:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-11 20:15 [PATCH] f2fs: fix quota info to adjust recovered data Jaegeuk Kim
2018-09-11 23:51 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2018-09-12 0:06 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-09-12 0:27 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-09-12 1:13 ` Chao Yu
2018-09-12 1:25 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-09-12 1:40 ` Chao Yu
2018-09-12 1:46 ` Chao Yu
2018-09-12 19:54 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-09-12 23:28 ` Chao Yu
2018-09-18 1:19 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-09-18 1:38 ` Chao Yu [this message]
2018-09-18 2:05 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-09-18 10:13 ` Chao Yu
2018-09-18 16:45 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-09-19 1:38 ` Chao Yu
2018-09-19 22:38 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-09-20 9:46 ` Chao Yu
2018-09-20 21:42 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-09-21 7:48 ` Chao Yu
2018-09-26 0:29 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-09-26 1:21 ` Chao Yu
2018-09-26 1:44 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-09-26 2:06 ` Chao Yu
2018-09-26 2:09 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-09-26 2:14 ` Chao Yu
2018-09-27 1:16 ` Chao Yu
2018-09-28 17:37 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-09-28 23:40 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-09-29 10:38 ` Chao Yu
2018-09-30 23:58 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-10-01 0:35 ` Chao Yu
2018-10-01 1:27 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-10-01 1:37 ` Chao Yu
2018-09-12 2:46 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-09-12 2:57 ` Chao Yu
2018-09-12 19:50 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-09-12 23:30 ` Chao Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c60b6e64-04ce-ec7c-24d8-82273e65b5b9@huawei.com \
--to=yuchao0@huawei.com \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).