linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
To: "loïc tourlonias" <loic.tourlonias@gmail.com>
Cc: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <devel@driverdev.osuosl.org>,
	<linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org>, <yuchao0@huawei.com>,
	<loic.tourlonias.lkml@gmail.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: erofs: add SPDX identifer
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 23:02:10 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c65f81ba-a411-1444-effc-7b8cfb0b53b1@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+XxOSG+cJ3FZ4S7qcRWWDcktDpStuoa7nTuAUOr+U-uTTUcYg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Loic,

On 2018/10/8 23:00, loïc tourlonias wrote:
> Hi Gao,
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 4:48 PM Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Greg,
>>
>> On 2018/10/8 22:43, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 10:36:39PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
>>>> Hi Greg,
>>>>
>>>> On 2018/10/8 22:22, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>>>> Why delete that line?
>>>>>
>>>>> But wait, why do we even have this file at all?  What's wrong with the
>>>>> lib/lz4/ code that we have in the kernel today?  Shouldn't the code
>>>>> using these files be moved over to use the lib/ code instead and this
>>>>> file be deleted?
>>>>
>>>> EROFS uses customized LZ4 decompression code for now (which has been offically
>>>> supported in lz4 1.8.3, I have updated it in
>>>> https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/lib-lz4-update-lz4-decompressor-module.patch
>>>> if it is shown up in Linux 4.20, I will remove all the customized LZ4 decompression code),
>>>> but lib/ code lz4def.h isn't export to include/.
>>>
>>> It should show up in 4.20, so you should be able to remove this all
>>> then.
>>
>> Yes, that is correct. I will fix it in 4.20 if the updated LZ4 is already there. :)
> 
> So no need to update the patch since the file will be removed. Am I correct?
> 
> Too bad, I'll make my first patch later... ^^

I think you could make the patch if you want :)
It is up to Greg whether take this patch or not since it is actually a cleanup attempt.

I will also do more cleanups beside my current work, yet EROFS is now busy in productization.

Thanks,
Gao Xiang

> 
> Thanks
> Loic
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Gao Xiang
>>
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>>
>>> greg k-h
>>>

      reply	other threads:[~2018-10-08 15:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-08 14:14 [PATCH v2] staging: erofs: add SPDX identifer Loic Tourlonias
2018-10-08 14:22 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-10-08 14:36   ` Gao Xiang
2018-10-08 14:41     ` Gao Xiang
2018-10-08 14:43     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-10-08 14:48       ` Gao Xiang
2018-10-08 15:00         ` loïc tourlonias
2018-10-08 15:02           ` Gao Xiang [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c65f81ba-a411-1444-effc-7b8cfb0b53b1@huawei.com \
    --to=gaoxiang25@huawei.com \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=loic.tourlonias.lkml@gmail.com \
    --cc=loic.tourlonias@gmail.com \
    --cc=yuchao0@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).