linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
To: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: kernel@pengutronix.de, andy.shevchenko@gmail.com,
	stable@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] driver core: clear deferred probe reason on probe retry
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 09:18:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c75441c4-1d77-f7c9-df51-38ad1fd72252@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210319110459.19966-1-a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>

Hi Ahmad,

W dniu 19.03.2021 o 12:04, Ahmad Fatoum pisze:
> When retrying a deferred probe, any old defer reason string should be
> discarded. Otherwise, if the probe is deferred again at a different spot,
> but without setting a message, the now incorrect probe reason will remain.
>
> This was observed with the i.MX I2C driver, which ultimately failed
> to probe due to lack of the GPIO driver. The probe defer for GPIO
> doesn't record a message, but a previous probe defer to clock_get did.
> This had the effect that /sys/kernel/debug/devices_deferred listed
> a misleading probe deferral reason.
>
> Cc: stable@kernel.org
> Fixes: d090b70ede02 ("driver core: add deferring probe reason to devices_deferred property")
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>


Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>


Regards

Andrzej


> ---
> v1 -> v2:
>   - reworded commit message (Andy)
>   - collected Andy's Reviewed-by
> ---
>   drivers/base/dd.c | 3 +++
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/dd.c b/drivers/base/dd.c
> index 9179825ff646..e2cf3b29123e 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/dd.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/dd.c
> @@ -97,6 +97,9 @@ static void deferred_probe_work_func(struct work_struct *work)
>   
>   		get_device(dev);
>   
> +		kfree(dev->p->deferred_probe_reason);
> +		dev->p->deferred_probe_reason = NULL;
> +
>   		/*
>   		 * Drop the mutex while probing each device; the probe path may
>   		 * manipulate the deferred list

      parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-22  8:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20210319110516eucas1p1d4e5152af8a1873f192f4edba8cfbb8f@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2021-03-19 11:04 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] driver core: clear deferred probe reason on probe retry Ahmad Fatoum
2021-03-19 11:04   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] driver core: add helper for deferred probe reason setting Ahmad Fatoum
2021-03-19 11:13     ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-03-19 11:46       ` Ahmad Fatoum
2021-03-19 12:16         ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-03-19 16:08           ` Ahmad Fatoum
2021-03-19 11:15     ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-03-19 11:47       ` Ahmad Fatoum
2021-03-23 14:07     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-03-23 15:27       ` Ahmad Fatoum
2021-03-22  8:18   ` Andrzej Hajda [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c75441c4-1d77-f7c9-df51-38ad1fd72252@samsung.com \
    --to=a.hajda@samsung.com \
    --cc=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=javierm@redhat.com \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).